NextFin

Chairman of Qianli Technology Warns Against 'Blind Leaps' in AI as Foundational Model Race Heats Up

Summarized by NextFin AI
  • Yin Qi, Chairman of Qianli Technology, argues that the traditional Silicon Valley approach to entrepreneurship is outdated in the current AI landscape, emphasizing the need for solid fundamentals in technology, product, and commercialization.
  • He predicts a paradigm shift in AI operating systems within the next 12 months, leading to a blurring of lines between hardware and AI services as devices evolve into intelligent agents.
  • Yin highlights the importance of business viability in foundational model companies, urging startups to justify significant compute investments with realistic ROI scenarios.
  • He anticipates a convergence of AI operating systems, services, and hardware, with a focus on the 'person-car-home' ecosystem, predicting massive shipments exceeding 50 million units annually.

Qiming Venture Partners Founding Managing Partner Duane Kuang and Qianli Technology Chairman Yin Qi

Duane Kuang, Founding Managing Partner of Qiming Venture and Yin Qi, Chairman of Qianli Technology

AsianFin -- If core elements such as technology, product, or commercialization are not sound, companies risk moving quickly in the wrong direction, said Yin Qi, Chairman of Qianli Technology and co-founder of facial recognition giant Megvii. He emphasized that without a business model that forms a closed loop, sustaining technological progress is unlikely.

Yin, who rose to prominence as a “CV Four Dragon” pioneer, made the remarks at the 2025 World Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai, in a fireside dialogue with Duane Kuang, Founding Managing Partner of Qiming Venture Partners.

He challenged a long-cherished Silicon Valley mantra: “Entrepreneurship is like jumping off a cliff and assembling a plane on the way down.” That mindset, he argued, no longer holds in today’s capital- and compute-intensive AI landscape.

Yin, now steering Qianli Technology, said he’s laser-focused on embedding AI in consumer hardware—especially smartphones and vehicles. He forecast two major trends: AI operating systems will undergo a paradigm shift within 12 months, and the line between hardware and AI services will blur as terminals evolve into full-stack intelligent agents.

“We’ll move from human-controlled devices to human-machine collaboration,” said Yin. “That means the form factor of hardware will become secondary. What matters is the AI agent service it enables.”

In his view, AI terminals will diversify before reconsolidating around dominant formats—offering opportunities for both Big Tech incumbents and startups in sectors ranging from auto interiors to smart homes.

Kuang echoed Yin’s structural view, calling 2025 the start of a “cycle of resonance” where rapid model development is now matched by practical deployment and cost-efficient scaling.

“In 2025, we’re seeing technology and application finally sync,” Kuang said. “The roots are in place, and the tree is starting to grow.”

According to Qiming’s 2025 AI Outlook, the next 12 to 24 months will see surging token consumption across multimodal models and AI agents, with token-cost optimization emerging as a key infrastructure battleground.

Yin acknowledged that while the U.S.–China model development gap has shrunk to roughly six months, the real divergence lies in resource input.

“The U.S. is investing far more compute into original breakthroughs,” he said. “China is more pragmatic, more trend-following.”

Still, he expects China to play a more critical role in the global open-source ecosystem—even if U.S. firms continue dominating proprietary innovation.

Yin described the evolution of AI across two axes: horizontally, through learning paradigms—from imitation to reinforcement to autonomous learning; and vertically, from language models to multimodal and embodied world models. He predicted the reinforcement learning phase would last through at least mid-2026.

Reflecting on his journey from Megvii to Qianli, Yin stressed the importance of business viability in foundational model companies. He challenged founders to justify annual compute investments of 2 to 3 billion yuan with realistic five- to ten-year ROI scenarios.

“Bold assumptions are okay, but you must return to common sense,” he said. “The flywheel has to turn.”

He categorized two types of “flywheels”: one close to consumers with immediate feedback loops, and another, slower-moving but with massive potential—like foundational models.

Yin voiced skepticism about pure AI software startups breaking through in China’s hyper-competitive landscape dominated by Tencent and ByteDance.

“Everyone’s watching this space,” he said. “It’s hard to sneak in unnoticed—unlike the early days of the mobile internet.”

Instead, he sees more upside in integrated AI hardware. As an example, he pointed to Xiaomi’s successful bundling of foldable phones with photo printers, forming what he called a "closed-loop AI service."

Looking ahead, Yin said operating systems—especially Android—will become key distribution platforms for AI agents. If products like Google’s Gemini roll out widely across Android phones, their daily active users could reach 300 million globally.

He anticipates a coming convergence between AI operating systems, services, and hardware—arguing that hardware will serve primarily as commoditized “carriers” for differentiated AI agents.

Yin proposed a framework for evaluating hardware opportunities: person (smartphones, wearables), car (intelligent driving, cockpits), and home (embodied AI scenarios).

He expects massive shipments—exceeding 50 million units annually—in this “person-car-home” ecosystem. Meanwhile, Qiming is betting on hardware subcategories with 1–5 million units shipped annually.

Despite the hype, Yin urged AI founders to balance vision with structure.

“Without a strategy that connects tech, product, and revenue, you’re just building in the dark,” he said.

This article first appeared on TMTPost App. Adapted and edited for Bloomberg-style reporting.

Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.

Insights

What are the key components of the AI foundational model race?

How has the perception of entrepreneurship in AI changed according to Yin Qi?

What trends does Yin Qi predict for AI operating systems in the next year?

How does Yin Qi view the relationship between hardware and AI services?

What are the current dynamics between the U.S. and China in AI development?

What challenges do AI startups face in the competitive landscape of China?

How does the investment in compute resources differ between U.S. and Chinese firms?

What role does Qianli Technology aim to play in the consumer hardware market?

What is the significance of closed-loop AI services in hardware integration?

How does Yin Qi categorize different types of 'flywheels' in AI businesses?

What implications do AI operating systems have for future hardware development?

How might the market for AI agents evolve in the next 12 to 24 months?

What examples illustrate successful integration of AI with consumer hardware?

What are the potential risks of 'blind leaps' in AI entrepreneurship?

How do multimodal models impact token consumption in AI applications?

What might the long-term effects of a convergence between AI services and hardware be?

What strategies does Yin Qi believe are necessary for successful AI ventures?

How can founders ensure a viable business model in the AI sector?

What future scenarios could arise from the shift to human-machine collaboration?

How might the AI landscape look by mid-2026 according to current predictions?

Search
NextFinNextFin
NextFin.Al
No Noise, only Signal.
Open App