NextFin

Game Science Keeps AIGC Out of Design Work on Black Myth: Zhong Kui

Summarized by NextFin AI
  • Game Science will keep generative AI out of the design and asset stages of Black Myth: Zhong Kui, preserving direct human control over its visual identity.
  • The sequel remains in early development, targeting photo-realistic environments, Chinese folklore themes, and a more grounded atmosphere centered on the demon-queller Zhong Kui.
  • Despite strong pressure to accelerate production after Black Myth: Wukong surpassed 30 million sales, Game Science is prioritizing artistic consistency over faster automation.
  • Like Christopher Nolan's use of traditional filmmaking techniques, the studio believes established craft methods can deliver distinctive results that generative systems may struggle to match.

NextFin News — Game Science has made clear that its second Black Myth game will not lean on generative artificial intelligence in the phases that shape its look and feel. In mid-August, Yang Qi, the studio’s co-founder and art director, answered a follower who asked whether current AI tools could accelerate Black Myth: Zhong Kui. His reply, posted on Weibo after he had praised Christopher Nolan’s new film The Odyssey, was direct:

“We’ll keep AIGC away from the design and asset stages. It’s not that we’re against it—we just want to hold the last shift properly. While we’re at it, look at digital cinema and 3D post-production: everyone says they’ve reached a dead end, yet Nolan is still going strong, stirring things up with older techniques. There’s no last train you absolutely have to catch. You can always check into a small inn for a while. And AI? There’s plenty of time for that. No rush.”

The comment stands apart from prevailing practice. Across the industry, generative systems are routinely used to produce concept art, textures, environmental assets and audio, trimming both calendar time and labor costs. The output is often functional yet frequently marked by generic detail and limited expressive range. Game Science is choosing, at least for the foundational visual work on its next title, to keep those decisions under direct human control.

Black Myth: Zhong Kui was announced at Gamescom in 2025 and remains in early development. Public materials are limited to a short cinematic trailer and a New Year promotional film. Studio descriptions point to a tonal shift from the high epic register of Black Myth: Wukong toward a more grounded, everyday atmosphere drawn from folklore surrounding the demon-queller Zhong Kui. Combat systems are expected to center on objects traditionally associated with the character. The visual ambition is higher-fidelity, photo-realistic environments and figures within a Chinese aesthetic framework, with narrative design adjusted for both domestic and international audiences. No release date has been set.

The restraint is easier to understand against the studio’s recent record. Black Myth: Wukong, launched in August 2024, became one of the most successful Chinese single-player action games ever released. Cumulative sales across platforms have been reported above 30 million copies, with more than half recorded outside China. Strong concurrent-player numbers on Steam, sustained critical reception and solid physical sales in several European markets established it as a genuine international event. After such a result, the incentive to accelerate a sequel is considerable. Game Science appears prepared to resist it.

Yang’s reference to Nolan supplies a useful parallel. In an era dominated by digital capture and extensive post-production, the director has continued to employ photochemical processes and large-format film for selected projects, arguing that older methods still yield distinctive results. The same logic is being applied to game art: established craft techniques need not be abandoned simply because faster alternatives exist.

For a series whose identity rests on dense, culturally specific imagery, the decision carries practical consequences. Generative tools generate volume efficiently; they are less consistent at the precise historical and stylistic detail that players associate with Black Myth. By retaining human oversight in the early design and asset phases, the team preserves the ability to set and maintain a coherent visual standard before any later production efficiencies are considered.

Many studios, Chinese and international, have publicly integrated generative pipelines to manage rising costs and tighter schedules. Game Science, buoyed by the commercial performance of its first major title and still early in the life of the next project, can afford a different tempo. Whether that slower approach yields a sharper artistic result, or simply a longer development cycle, will be clear only when the game reaches players. For the present, the studio has elected to treat visual craft as a resource worth protecting rather than a constraint to be automated.

Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.

Insights

Why has Game Science decided to keep AIGC out of the design and asset stages of Black Myth: Zhong Kui?

What does AIGC usually do in game development, and why do many studios rely on it?

What technical and artistic limits of generative AI matter most for a game like Black Myth: Zhong Kui?

How does Black Myth: Zhong Kui differ in tone and visual direction from Black Myth: Wukong?

What is known so far about Black Myth: Zhong Kui's setting, combat ideas, and visual style?

How successful was Black Myth: Wukong in sales and global reception, and why does that matter for the sequel?

Why is Game Science in a stronger position than many studios to avoid rushing AI adoption?

What does Yang Qi's comparison to Christopher Nolan suggest about older craft methods in modern game production?

How are other game studios in China and abroad using generative AI to cut costs and save time?

What recent public updates have been shared about Black Myth: Zhong Kui since its Gamescom 2025 announcement?

Why might human-led design be especially important for games built around culturally specific imagery and folklore?

What risks could come from rejecting AIGC in early production, especially for schedule and development cost?

Could Game Science later use AI in other parts of development even if it avoids it in core visual design?

How does Game Science's approach compare with broader industry trends toward AI-assisted art and asset creation?

What long-term impact could this decision have on player trust, studio identity, and the Black Myth brand?

If Black Myth: Zhong Kui succeeds with a slower human-driven pipeline, could it influence other studios' design choices?

Search, ask or analyze anything...