NextFin News - On January 19, 2026, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), led by Chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb, escalated its call for the Australian Labor government to pass legislation that would require Apple and Google to open their mobile app stores to rival platforms and alternative payment methods. This demand was made in Canberra, Australia, as part of a broader regulatory effort to dismantle the duopoly held by these US tech giants in the app distribution market. The ACCC's push follows similar regulatory changes in Europe, where new laws have already enabled the emergence of competing app stores, thereby increasing options for developers and consumers alike.
Currently, Apple and Google maintain strict control over their app ecosystems, effectively blocking third-party app stores and mandating the use of their proprietary payment systems, which charge commissions up to 30%. The ACCC highlighted the economic inefficiencies and inflated costs resulting from this model, citing the example of Epic Games, which operates its own store internationally and charges no commission on the first $1 million in revenue and a reduced 12% commission thereafter. The ACCC argues that such reforms would generate widespread economic benefits, given the pervasive use of apps across Australian businesses and consumers.
The Australian Banking Association, represented by CEO Simon Birmingham, has publicly supported the ACCC's stance, advocating for Australia to emulate Europe's regulatory framework to ensure a level playing field. The ACCC first raised concerns about app store competition in 2021 and has since drafted rules to prohibit 'anti-steering' provisions that prevent developers from directing users to cheaper payment options. However, the government has yet to enact the necessary legislation to empower these reforms.
Apple and Google defend their restrictions on the grounds of privacy and security, a position that has been contested in Australian courts. Notably, a Federal Court ruling last year found that the companies' market dominance likely results in higher commissions than would be expected in a more open market, a case initiated by Epic Games. While the Albanese government has demonstrated a willingness to confront Big Tech on issues such as social media regulation and news payments, it faces diplomatic sensitivities given the US origin of these companies.
The ACCC's intensified pressure reflects a global trend of regulatory scrutiny over Big Tech's market power, particularly in digital marketplaces. The European Union's Digital Markets Act (DMA), implemented in 2024, has set a precedent by mandating interoperability and open access, which has already led to the launch of multiple competing app stores and reduced commission rates for developers. Australia's potential adoption of similar measures could catalyze a more competitive app ecosystem, fostering innovation and reducing costs for end-users.
From an economic perspective, the current app store model imposes significant friction costs on developers, especially small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which face high commission fees that can reach 30% of their revenue. This cost structure discourages innovation and limits the diversity of apps available to consumers. By enabling alternative app stores and payment systems, the market could see increased competition, driving down fees and encouraging a broader range of app offerings.
Moreover, the ACCC's advocacy aligns with broader antitrust and competition policy frameworks aimed at curbing monopolistic practices in digital markets. The move to ban 'anti-steering' provisions is particularly significant, as it empowers developers to inform consumers about cheaper payment options, enhancing price transparency and consumer sovereignty.
However, the implementation of such reforms must carefully balance competition objectives with legitimate concerns about user privacy and security. Apple and Google argue that their closed ecosystems provide robust protections against malware and fraud, which could be compromised by opening the platforms. Regulatory frameworks will need to establish stringent security standards for third-party app stores to mitigate these risks.
Looking ahead, if the Australian Labor government enacts the ACCC's proposed legislation, it could trigger a wave of innovation and competition in the app market, potentially attracting new entrants and fostering a more dynamic digital economy. This could also influence regulatory approaches in other jurisdictions, reinforcing a global shift towards greater oversight of Big Tech platforms.
Diplomatically, the government will need to navigate the complexities of US-Australia relations, as regulatory actions against American tech giants may provoke political and economic tensions. Nonetheless, the Albanese administration's willingness to challenge Big Tech signals a commitment to protecting consumer interests and promoting fair competition in the digital economy.
In conclusion, the ACCC's intensified pressure on the Australian Labor government to open Apple and Google app stores represents a critical juncture in Australia's digital regulatory landscape. By aligning with international best practices and addressing entrenched market power, Australia has the opportunity to foster a more competitive, innovative, and consumer-friendly app ecosystem, with significant economic and social benefits.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
