NextFin News - The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump is drawing up plans to halt customs and immigration processing at international airports in "sanctuary cities," sparking fierce warnings from major airlines, hotel chains, and tourism groups about devastating economic fallout just two weeks before the FIFA Men's World Cup begins.
Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin revealed the potential policy shift during an interview on Fox News' "Hannity" on Tuesday night. Mullin argued that if local Democratic officials refuse to allow the federal government to enforce immigration laws, the administration should retaliate by withholding federal customs services. "If they aren't going to allow us to enforce federal laws, we shouldn't be processing international flights into their cities either," Mullin said, adding that while plans are being drafted, no immediate changes have been implemented.
The threat targets some of the busiest international gateways in the world. Last August, the Justice Department published a list of jurisdictions it accused of impeding federal immigration policies, a roster that includes New York, Newark, Boston, Chicago, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Seattle, and Philadelphia. Together, these hubs handle the vast majority of international arrivals and cargo entering the United States.
Industry groups reacted with immediate alarm. Airlines for America, a trade association representing major carriers including American Airlines, United Airlines, and Delta Air Lines, warned that reducing Customs and Border Protection staffing at these airports would trigger severe operational chaos. The group stated that such a move would have a devastating effect on the airline and tourism industries, disrupting passenger travel and the flow of international cargo.
The timing of the announcement has injected intense anxiety into the travel sector. The FIFA Men's World Cup, co-hosted by the United States, Canada, and Mexico, is scheduled to kick off in mid-June. The tournament is expected to draw millions of international visitors, with many matches hosted in the very cities targeted by the administration's threat, including New York, Los Angeles, and Boston.
For U.S. President Trump, the proposal represents a high-stakes escalation in his administration's campaign against local jurisdictions that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities. By threatening to choke off international air travel, the administration is attempting to leverage the economic interests of major metropolitan areas to force local leaders into compliance.
Yet, industry analysts and legal experts suggest the administration's plan faces formidable hurdles that may prevent it from ever being enacted. Shutting down customs processing at major airports would likely trigger immediate legal challenges from state attorneys general, airport authorities, and private corporations. Critics argue that withholding federally mandated customs services to punish local political decisions could violate administrative laws and international aviation treaties.
Furthermore, the operational reality of diverting international flights away from major hubs is practically impossible. Alternative airports lack the customs facilities, runway capacity, and hotel infrastructure to handle millions of diverted passengers. A unilateral shutdown of customs at JFK or LAX would not merely redirect traffic; it would effectively shut down a significant portion of global aviation, harming international airlines and domestic businesses alike.
The hotel industry, represented by groups like the American Hotel and Lodging Association, has also voiced deep concern. Major hotel chains, including Marriott International and Hilton Worldwide, rely heavily on international business and leisure travelers, particularly during the peak summer travel season and high-profile events like the World Cup. A sudden drop in international arrivals would hit occupancy rates and hospitality revenues across the country.
While the administration appears to be using the threat as a political cudgel, the mere discussion of such measures risks damaging the international reputation of the United States as a travel destination. Travel industry executives warn that foreign tourists and business travelers may choose to bypass the country entirely if they face the prospect of sudden flight cancellations or chaotic border processing.
The standoff highlights the growing tension between the administration's aggressive immigration agenda and the economic realities of a highly interconnected global economy. Whether the threat is a negotiating tactic or a precursor to an unprecedented executive action, the travel industry is preparing for a prolonged battle to protect its operations from becoming collateral damage in a federal-local political feud.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
