NextFin News - Asia is facing its most acute food-security stress in years as a strengthening "super" El Niño collides with war-driven fertilizer and fuel disruptions, raising the risk of civil unrest across some of the region's largest economies. Risk consultancy Verisk Maplecroft warned on Thursday that more than half of the countries rated high or very high risk on its Food Security Index also sit in the two highest tiers of its predictive Civil Unrest Index - a cluster that includes India, Bangladesh, Indonesia and the Philippines, where protests have already erupted in recent weeks.
The warning lands as a powerful El Niño is already reshaping weather across the world's most populous continent. The U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Climate Prediction Center said on September 10 that El Niño is strengthening, with a greater than 90% chance of a "very strong" event during the Northern Hemisphere fall and winter of 2026-27. By mid-September, the weekly Niño 3.4 Relative Oceanic Niño Index - a climate-adjusted measure of the phenomenon's true strength - had reached 2.0 degrees Celsius, the threshold forecasters use for the unofficial "super" designation.
The weather shock is arriving on top of supply disruptions from the war in Iran, which has already cut into fuel and fertilizer flows through the Strait of Hormuz, a chokepoint for global agricultural inputs. Verisk Maplecroft's central finding is that the combination is politically combustible: "The data suggest if food price and availability pressures intensify, and governments are seen to respond ineffectively, unrest and political instability could emerge in these higher-risk markets," the consultancy said in its report.
The stress is already visible in the data. Indonesia, the world's largest palm oil producer, is battling hard-to-control wildfires that have disrupted harvests. India's southwest monsoon - the lifeblood of its rain-fed agriculture - is running roughly 14% below normal and could widen to more than 15% as El Niño strengthens through September. Thailand's sugar output for the 2026-27 season is forecast to fall below 10 million tonnes, a drop of at least 17% from the previous season. And across the region, food inflation is re-entering household budgets: Indonesia's Statistics Agency reported rice prices rising across 132 regencies and cities through the third week of August, while bird's-eye chili jumped 3.60% month-to-date across 182 regions.
That mix - a climate shock layered on a geopolitical one - is what makes this episode different from a routine weather-driven price spike. The question is whether it is severe enough to break the political stability of governments already under pressure.
The Transmission Mechanism: From Fertilizer to the Ballot Box
Food prices do not move governments directly; they move through purchasing power. The chain runs from the Strait of Hormuz to the village market to the street. When fertilizer and fuel costs rise, farmers either absorb the hit - cutting application rates and planting less - or pass it on. Either way, the harvest shrinks or the price rises. In import-dependent Asia, the bill then arrives in the local currency, magnified by any exchange-rate weakness.
For poor households, food is not a discretionary line item. It is the budget. When rice, chili, cooking oil or sugar jump double digits, families cut everything else first: transport, schooling, healthcare. That is why food inflation has a political multiplier that headline inflation does not. Verisk Maplecroft's overlap between its Food Security Index and its Civil Unrest Index is the empirical expression of that link: the countries that cannot afford food are also the ones where governments are least trusted to fix it.
The consultancy's second point is more worrying than the first: some damage is already locked in. Verisk Maplecroft said:
"The impacts are increasingly visible. In many key agriculture regions, planting and fertilization decisions were made during the peak of the disruption, meaning negative impacts may now be locked in even if the geopolitical situation improves in the coming months."
In other words, a ceasefire tomorrow would not rescue this season's crop.
Indonesia's recent street protests - students rallying in Jakarta against President Prabowo Subianto's spending plans and a fuel price hike, demanding lower food and fuel costs - show how quickly the chain completes. Rice is the region's most political crop: it is the staple, it is closely tied to rural livelihoods, and it is the item most likely to trigger public anger when its price rises.
Cyclical Shock, Structural Vulnerability
Is this a cyclical weather event that will pass, or a structural break in the food system? The honest answer is both - and confusing the two is where most analysis goes wrong.
The cyclical leg is clear. El Niño is a recurring phase of the El Niño-Southern Oscillation, and its Asian signature - drier conditions across Southeast Asia and South Asia, wetter conditions in parts of the Americas - is well documented. The 2015-16 event affected more than 60 million people and caused an estimated $5 billion in losses, yet global food prices eventually normalized. Today's global cereal stock-to-use ratio sits around 32%, a historically comfortable buffer, and the FAO Food Price Index at 133.3 points in August 2026 remains 16.8% below its March 2022 peak. On that evidence, this is a sharp but mean-reverting shock: when the rains return and the war ends, prices should follow supply back down.
The structural leg is equally real, and it is what turns a cyclical shock into a political one. Since the fourth quarter of 2022, food-security risk has risen in 135 of the 186 countries Verisk Maplecroft tracks - the highest count since the dataset launched in 2017, with only 13 countries left in the low-risk category. That is not a weather cycle; that is a decade of compounding shocks - pandemic, the Ukraine war, Red Sea disruption, export bans, and now the Iran war - teaching governments that open markets cannot be relied upon. The response has been inward-looking: larger strategic reserves, export restrictions, and a premium on self-sufficiency. Those policies protect domestic consumers in the short run but fragment global supply in the long run, making the next shock more likely to hit everyone at once.
Climate change is the quiet multiplier underneath both legs. NOAA's new RONI metric, introduced in February 2026, strips out the Pacific's background warming to measure El Niño's "true" strength - and this is the first event captured by it. The fact that the metric had to be redesigned is itself evidence that the baseline has shifted. A super El Niño riding on a warmer ocean is not the phenomenon Asian agriculture adapted to in the 1990s.
So the call: the price spike is cyclical and should fade; the fragility it exposes is structural and will not.
The Second-Order Risk the Market Is Not Pricing
The conventional read is simple: bad weather plus war equals higher food prices. That is already reflected in the August FAO numbers. The second-order risk is what those prices do to policy - and through policy, to growth and interest rates.
History offers a template. Food price spikes in 2007-08 and 2010-11 are widely documented as having contributed to social unrest across the Middle East and Asia. Those episodes did not just hurt consumers; they triggered export bans by major suppliers, which amplified the price move and turned a supply problem into a panic. Today, with governments already primed for food self-sufficiency, the same reflex is more likely and faster. If India tightens rice exports further, if Thailand or Vietnam intervene, the price signal that would normally ration demand instead becomes a self-fulfilling scramble. That is the transmission channel from a crop shortfall in one country to a protest in another: not the shortage itself, but the policy overreaction to it.
There is also a cross-asset channel that equity and bond investors tend to miss. Food inflation in Asia feeds directly into core inflation, and core inflation sets the floor for central-bank policy. The Asian Development Bank in April cut its 2026 growth forecast for developing Asia and the Pacific to 4.7% from 5.1%, citing the war in the Middle East, while lifting its inflation forecast for the region to 5.2% from 3.6%.
"We are confronting systemic, long-lasting disruptions to global energy and trade networks, not just temporary volatility," ADB President Masato Kanda said in a statement at the time.
If food prices force Asian central banks to hold rates higher for longer just as growth slows, the region faces the worst combination: stagflationary pressure without the policy space to fight it. That is a different trade from "higher food prices."
Paul Donovan, chief economist at UBS, framed the hierarchy of risks in a note published in late March: "However, higher fertilizer prices may not be the biggest agricultural price threat this year, 2026 might produce a super El Niño weather pattern. In that case, drought and limited water supply might be more important than shortages of nitrogen." The market has been pricing the fertilizer channel; the drought channel is the one still being underweighted.
The Case Against the Alarm - and What Would Prove It Wrong
The strongest argument against the unrest thesis is that the system has more shock absorbers than it did two decades ago. Global cereal stocks are near record levels relative to use. The FAO Food Price Index is still far below its 2022 high. Brazil's wet weather can partially offset Asian dryness, and El Niño's full agricultural impact often arrives a season late - sugar analysts note that poor monsoon rainfall can hit ratoon cane and replanting, meaning the bigger production hit may not show until 2027-28. On that view, governments have time, buffers, and the memory of 2008 to deploy targeted subsidies before unrest becomes unmanageable.
That case is substantial, and it is why this is a risk, not a forecast of inevitable upheaval. But it rests on one assumption: that governments are seen to respond effectively. Verisk Maplecroft's own trigger condition is not the price level; it is the perception of incompetence. A government with deep pockets and a credible subsidy machine can survive a 20% rice spike. A government already facing protests over fuel prices may not survive a 20% rice spike on top.
The falsifying signal is specific: if the FAO Food Price Index stays below roughly 135 points through the first quarter of 2027 and the global cereal stock-to-use ratio holds at or above 32%, the near-term unrest thesis weakens materially. A break above 140 on the index, combined with tightening rice stocks and a fresh wave of export restrictions, would confirm it.
Who Wins, Who Loses, and What to Watch
The beneficiaries are the exporters outside the El Niño zone - Brazil's sugar and grain complex, and North American agriculture - plus the fertilizer and farm-input suppliers that gain pricing power when supply is tight. The exposed are the net food importers of Southeast and South Asia, their consumers, and their governments. For investors, the asymmetry runs through inflation-sensitive assets: Asian consumer staples with pricing power may pass costs through, but mass-market retailers, two-wheelers, and anything dependent on discretionary household spending will feel the squeeze first.
Split by horizon, the picture differs. In the short term - the next three to six months - sentiment and liquidity dominate, and the key variable is whether governments pre-empt with subsidies and releases from strategic reserves. In the medium term - through the 2026-27 harvest - fundamentals dominate, and the rice, sugar, and palm oil crops will set the tone. In the long term, the structural leg dominates: a more fragmented, reserve-heavy, export-restriction-prone global food system is a system with a higher baseline of volatility, and that premium does not disappear when this El Niño fades.
The base case is that food prices grind higher through the Northern Hemisphere winter, unrest remains localized, and no major Asian government falls. The upside case for stability: the war in Iran de-escalates quickly, the Strait of Hormuz reopens fully, and El Niño peaks below "historic" intensity - food prices roll over by mid-2027. The downside case: a historic El Niño coincides with renewed export bans, pushing the FAO index above 140 and turning localized protests into a regional political test.
The watchlist is narrow: the FAO Food Price Index each month; India's final monsoon tally; Thailand's crushing progress from October; and any export-policy announcement from New Delhi, Bangkok, or Hanoi. For conflict-stricken Afghanistan and Myanmar, Verisk Maplecroft adds, a food shock would raise the risk of a humanitarian catastrophe - a reminder that the human cost of this episode will be measured in more than inflation prints.
This is not a story about how much rice Asia can grow. It is a story about how much legitimacy its governments have left when the rice runs short - and the fertilizer that would have grown it is stuck behind a war.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
