U.S.-China Relations
NextFin News - Bitcoin steadied near $76,000 on Friday as the brutal two-day selloff that erased the cryptocurrency's post-election rally showed its first signs of exhaustion, with traders turning their attention to the U.S. jobs report due later in the day and weighing whether the rout was a leverage-driven flush or the start of a deeper reckoning for the AI trade that has powered the market for the past two years.
The Selloff in Numbers
Bitcoin was trading at around $76,000 on Friday morning in New York, having tumbled almost 6% from a position above $80,000 a day earlier. The largest cryptocurrency had briefly slipped to $75,230 before buyers stepped in, leaving the token down 5.91% over 24 hours at $76,070, with a 30-day decline of 11.13% that has wiped out the gains booked after the U.S. midterm elections.
The move was not a crypto-specific event. It was the tail end of a cross-asset risk-off wave that began on Wednesday night, when Democrats secured control of both chambers of Congress. That outcome upended the political bet that had powered the AI and chip complex: a friendly Washington green-lighting rapid data-center expansion. By Thursday, the Nasdaq Composite had plunged 5.4%, losing $2.5 trillion in market value in a single session, a record, and entering correction territory. The S&P 500 fell more than 4%, its worst day since April 2025, while the Dow industrials shed 1,833 points.
The semiconductor complex bore the brunt. The iShares Semiconductor ETF dropped close to 11%, its worst session since March 2020, with every component down more than 6%. Nvidia fell 9.3%, while Micron and AMD each slid 16%. Qualcomm added fuel after its quarterly report showed handset revenue falling 26% to $5.14 billion, missing estimates, and management guiding chip-design operating margin down to 20%-22% from 24%, with pricing actions not expected to help until the second half of fiscal 2027.
Crypto derivatives amplified the equity move into a cascade. Nearly $1.1 billion in leveraged positions were liquidated over 24 hours, with roughly 90% of them long bets. About $880 million of that was closed in a single four-hour window, affecting nearly 211,000 traders. Open interest fell 1.61% to $52.03 billion, and the Fear and Greed Index slipped to 51, neutral territory that signals neither panic nor euphoria.
Spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds, which had been the cleanest signal of institutional demand, also wobbled. They recorded about $1.16 billion in net outflows across three sessions through November 3, before swinging back to a $74.6 million inflow on November 4. Year-to-date flows remain marginally negative at roughly $60 million, a reminder that the institutional bid is present but not yet a one-way tide.
The setup for Friday was the Labor Department's October payrolls report at 8:30 a.m. Eastern. Economists expect 59,000 new jobs, up from 29,000 in September, with the unemployment rate steady at 4.2% and average hourly earnings rising 0.3%. It is the first hard data point that can confirm or deny the market's growing conviction that the Federal Reserve's next move is another rate hike.
Politics Set the Direction, Earnings Pulled the Trigger
The easy read is that weak chip earnings triggered the rout. The more accurate read is that politics set the direction and earnings supplied the trigger.
The Democratic sweep of Congress did two things at once. First, it raised the probability of stricter scrutiny over AI infrastructure spending, covering data-center permitting, energy use, and the pace of the buildout that has been the single largest demand driver for Nvidia, Broadcom, and their suppliers. Second, it cast doubt on the industry-friendly legislation that crypto had priced in, most visibly the CLARITY Act, which failed a Senate cloture vote of 49-50 in September and now faces an even steeper path.
Bitcoin's reaction was immediate and symmetrical to the political bet it had just made. The token had jumped above $80,000 on Wednesday on expectations that a divided or friendly Washington would leave crypto policy alone. Within 24 hours of the sweep, it had given back the entire move. That symmetry is the tell: this was a repricing of political risk, not a reassessment of Bitcoin's fundamentals.
Qualcomm's report then confirmed the second-order fear that the AI trade's revenue math may not yet justify its valuation. Handset revenue fell 26% year over year. Gross margin slipped to 52.4% against a 53.2% consensus. Management's margin guidance for chip design dropped to 20%-22% from 24%. For a market that had been pricing perpetual acceleration, "later" was the wrong answer.
"We would expect U.S. crypto equities to be more sensitive than bitcoin, particularly businesses reliant on new regulatory permissions. Established, compliant operators could even benefit from greater scrutiny of competitors. So miners who already have data centers set up are likely to remain in high demand by AI hyperscalers."
James Butterfill, head of research at CoinShares, captured the asymmetry: the policy shock lands hardest on the permission-seekers, not on the asset itself.
How an Equity Selloff Became a Crypto Cascade
The transmission channel ran through leverage, not fundamentals. Bitcoin has no earnings to revise downward when chip guidance disappoints. What it does have is a derivatives market with $52 billion of open interest and a cohort of traders who had been long into the election.
The chain was mechanical. Equities sold off, risk appetite contracted, Bitcoin broke below $79,000 and then $76,000, liquidation engines closed long positions automatically, forced selling pushed price lower, and more liquidations followed. Nearly $950 million of the roughly $1.1 billion in liquidations were longs. A single four-hour window accounted for about $880 million. That concentration, 80% of the damage in one afternoon, is the signature of a positioning flush, not a slow reassessment of value.
The evidence that this was leverage-driven rather than fundamentals-driven is in the funding rate. After the flush, funding stood at 0.0084% per eight hours, positive but far below the level that signals overheated long leverage. Open interest fell only 1.61%. In other words, the market did not need to deleverage much to reach equilibrium; the excess was thin, and it was cleared quickly.
A crypto-specific tailwind compounded the pressure. The largest exchange by volume reopened withdrawals on November 1 after a $6.3 billion theft that federal investigators attribute to North Korea's TraderTraitor group. Net outflows from the venue reached $3.64 billion, or 2.1% of its $171 billion in assets, with $2.85 billion of the stolen funds frozen as of November 5. It was a liquidity event on one platform, but it arrived in the same 48 hours as the equity rout.
Cyclical Flush, Not Structural Break
The central question for the next leg is whether the selloff marks a cyclical fluctuation that will revert or a structural shift that will not. The evidence points to cyclical: a mean-reverting positioning flush layered on top of an intact structural uptrend.
Three comparisons support the cyclical read. First, the magnitude: a 6% decline in Bitcoin is routine against a 30-day move of 11.13%, and the token remains 39.67% below its all-time high of $126,080, meaning the structural drawdown from the peak has already occurred and the current move is a fraction of it. Second, the speed: the entire decline happened in roughly 48 hours, with 80% of liquidations in one four-hour window. Fast flushes revert faster than slow grinds because they do not reflect a gradual change in conviction. Third, the breadth: the move was correlated with equities, not idiosyncratic to crypto. When Bitcoin falls because the Nasdaq falls, it recovers when the Nasdaq stabilizes. When it falls on a protocol-level failure or a regulatory ban, the recovery requires a fundamental repair. This was the former.
The structural leg, however, is not unambiguously bullish. A Democratic Congress is a genuine regime variable for crypto policy. The CLARITY Act is likely stalled through 2028. But that has a counterweight: the bipartisan composition of the new Congress is more crypto-friendly than the old one. Stand With Crypto counts 19 pro-crypto Senate candidates elected versus eight anti-crypto, and 228 in the House versus 106. The Fairshake super PAC won 29 of the 34 races it spent on, including three of the six House candidates it prioritized.
"We expect the Clarity Act to remain on hold through 2028. Even so, there is a clear path forward for stablecoins and for the tokenization of public equities under the SEC's five-year innovation exemption. Technological progress is rarely rolled back. Once the benefits of faster settlement, lower costs and markets that never close become clear to investors and institutions, this shift will be very difficult to reverse, regardless of who wins the White House in 2028."
Joseph Chalom, chief executive of ether treasury company Sharplink, put the structural case plainly: legislation can stall, but adoption does not need permission.
The verdict: the selloff is cyclical, a leverage flush that has already cleared. The structural trend remains up, but with a higher risk premium priced in for regulatory uncertainty. The two forces are separable, and conflating them is the most common error investors make after a political shock.
The Second-Order Question: What the Fed Sees
The first-order story is obvious: AI stocks fell, Bitcoin followed. The second-order story is what happens to the Federal Reserve, and it is the chain the market has not fully priced.
A Democratic Congress raises the probability of tighter AI regulation. That slows data-center capital expenditure. That slows the productivity boom the Fed has been watching. That reduces inflationary pressure from the AI buildout. That makes the case for a rate hike weaker, not stronger. Yet the market has moved in the opposite direction: pricing platforms put the chance of a December Fed hike at 66% as of November 5, and above 80% a day earlier.
That is the expectation gap. The market is pricing the political shock as inflationary, assuming more scrutiny, higher compliance costs, and a slower supply response. The counter-reading is that it is disinflationary: slower AI investment means slower demand growth, which means less pressure on the Fed to tighten. Only one of these readings can drive the next leg, and the jobs report is the arbiter.
Consensus is 59,000 new jobs with 4.2% unemployment and 0.3% wage growth. If payrolls come in above 100,000 with unemployment at 4.1%, the hike narrative strengthens, and Bitcoin, which has been trading on the expectation that the Fed's tightening cycle is near its end, loses its monetary tailwind at the same moment its political risk rises.
"If payrolls come in above 100,000 and the unemployment rate hits 4.1%, I'd expect some market reaction. I don't think the market will really change its expectations for a December hike, but we might see expectations warm up for further hikes in the first quarter of 2027."
Adam Schickling, a senior economist at Vanguard Group, framed the threshold precisely.
The Counter-Thesis, and the Signal That Would Prove It
The strongest case against the cyclical-flush reading is that this time the shock is not a price event but a policy event, and policy shocks do not mean-revert. A Democratic Congress with committee gavels can launch investigations into crypto-related ventures tied to the administration, tighten data-center permitting, and stall industry legislation indefinitely. That is not a four-hour liquidation; it is a multi-year headwind. Under this thesis, the $76,000 level is not a buying opportunity but the first step down from a political ceiling that will hold until at least 2028.
This counter-thesis is backed by the institutional view that near-term volatility is the base case. The policy reset is real, and the CLARITY Act's failure in September proves that even a friendlier Congress struggled to pass crypto legislation.
The answer is that the counter-thesis confuses the pace of legislation with the direction of adoption. Policy can slow the formalization of crypto markets, but it cannot reverse the institutional infrastructure already built, the exchange-traded funds, the custody networks, the tokenization pilots. And the composition of the new Congress cuts against the bear case: a body with 247 pro-crypto members across both chambers is less likely to pursue hostile action than the caricature suggests.
The falsifying signal is specific and observable. If the CLARITY Act or equivalent comprehensive crypto legislation is not reintroduced in the first 100 days of the 120th Congress, and if either chamber launches a formal investigation into crypto-related businesses tied to the administration, the policy-headwind thesis is confirmed and the cyclical-flush call is wrong. Until then, the default is volatility within an uptrend, not a regime break.
Three Scenarios for the Week Ahead
The immediate path depends on the jobs report and whether equities stabilize. Three scenarios, each with a trigger:
Base case: stabilization near $76,000, then a grind back toward $80,000. Trigger: payrolls come in near the 59,000 consensus, unemployment holds at 4.2%, and the Nasdaq holds its losses without extending them. In this scenario, the flush is confirmed as complete, leverage is cleared, and Bitcoin retests the $80,000 level as the political risk premium settles. Beneficiaries: large-cap Bitcoin miners with operating data centers, established compliant exchanges, and the spot ETF issuers that captured the November 4 inflow.
Upside case: a clean break above $80,000. Trigger: payrolls miss to the downside, below 40,000, with unemployment rising to 4.3%, which would revive the pause-or-cut narrative and weaken the dollar. Bitcoin would then recover both its monetary tailwind and its political risk premium in one move. The exposed: short-dollar trades and rate-sensitive growth equities would rally alongside.
Downside case: a retest of the $75,000 area. Trigger: payrolls beat to the upside, above 100,000, with wages accelerating above 0.3%, confirming the December hike and pushing longer-dated Treasury yields higher. Bitcoin would then face the double pressure of a stronger dollar and a higher discount rate, and the $75,000 area, just below the flush's $75,230 intraday low, would be retested. The exposed: leveraged long books that survived the first liquidation wave, and crypto equities that are more sensitive to regulatory headlines than the token itself.
Across time horizons, the picture diverges. In the short term, measured in days, sentiment and liquidity dominate, and the market is oversold after a 6% flush. In the medium term, weeks to months, fundamentals and policy dominate, and the regulatory overhang from a Democratic Congress is a genuine headwind that caps the upside. In the long term, measured in years, the structural adoption trend, exchange-traded funds, tokenization, institutional custody, remains intact and is largely independent of which party holds committee gavels.
The watchlist for the next week is concrete: the October payrolls print and its wage component, whether the Nasdaq stabilizes above its correction low, spot ETF flow data for a second consecutive inflow day, and any statement from congressional leadership on crypto legislation.
This was a leverage flush wearing a political mask. The politics supplied the narrative, but the derivatives market supplied the damage, and flushes revert faster than narratives change.
Data as of Friday morning, November 6, 2026, before the U.S. October nonfarm payrolls release.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
