NextFin News - Cathie Wood's ARK Invest is turning its $1.3 billion venture fund into a token that can trade 24 hours a day, pairing the most sought-after private artificial-intelligence stakes in the market with blockchain rails that never close.
The deal, announced September 24, 2026, puts the ARK Venture Fund on Ethereum through tokenization platform Securitize, cuts the entry price to $500, and promises daily net-asset-value reporting. It is the clearest signal yet that tokenization is moving from Treasury bills and money-market funds into the asset class where liquidity has always been hardest: venture capital.
The Fund Behind the Token
The ARK Venture Fund (ticker: ARKVX) is not a typical exchange-traded fund. Roughly 61% of its portfolio sits in private companies that cannot be sold on an exchange, including Anthropic, Blockdaemon, SpaceX, Databricks and Replit, according to the fund's own holdings disclosure dated January 31, 2026. Anthropic alone accounts for 12.80% of assets, followed by Blockdaemon at 7.49%, SpaceX at 5.81% and Databricks at 5.74%. Coinbase Global is the largest public name at 3.71%. In aggregate, private holdings represent 60.68% of the portfolio and public holdings 39.32%.
Investors who want exposure to that private AI complex have had to accept two constraints: high minimums and quarterly liquidity, with exits limited to the fund's repurchase offers. The tokenized structure attacks both. US retail investors can subscribe through Securitize starting at $500, and the fund interests can move on blockchain-based markets at any hour. Securitize will publish a daily NAV, and the shares will be issued on Ethereum first, with expansion to other chains possible later.
The relationship behind the deal predates the announcement. In October 2025, ARK made a strategic investment in Securitize, and the venture fund itself held Securitize equity plus a $10 million convertible note carrying 5% interest and maturing in September 2028. Securitize went public on the New York Stock Exchange in July 2026 under the ticker SECZ after merging with Cantor Equity Partners II in a transaction that raised roughly $400 million. At the time of that investment, Securitize's chief executive, Carlos Domingo, framed the shift plainly:
"Tokenization has reached an inflection point, with some of the largest asset managers and issuers in the world now bringing funds and equities onchain."
The tokenization launch is, in effect, ARK putting its own infrastructure bet to work.
There is, however, a constraint the headline does not mention. Buybacks remain limited to quarterly repurchase offers. The tokens make ownership transferable around the clock, but they do not force the fund to redeem shares daily. That distinction - transferability without continuous redemption - is the design choice that keeps the structure from breaking, and it is the detail investors should not skip.
The regulatory path was laid earlier this year. In a filing published by the SEC in late August, ARK asked for exemptive relief to create a "Tokenized Class" of shares that could trade on alternative trading systems or other quotation mediums, alongside a separate "Exchange Class" that could list on a national securities exchange. The application, dated August 24, 2026, seeks relief under Sections 6(c), 18 and 17(d) of the Investment Company Act and Rules 23c-3 and 17d-1. It explicitly does not ask for permission to list the shares on decentralized-finance platforms. The hearing-request window closed September 18, clearing the way for the commission to issue an order.
What Tokenization Actually Makes Liquid
The first question is mechanical: what becomes liquid when a venture fund goes onchain? The answer is the wrapper, not the contents. The fund still owns private-company stakes that cannot be sold on demand. What becomes transferable is the claim on that portfolio - the fund share - recorded on a blockchain instead of in a transfer agent's ledger.
That distinction explains why the quarterly repurchase window survives. If ARK offered continuous redemptions against a portfolio that is 61% private, it would create a textbook maturity mismatch: daily liquidity on the liability side, multi-year lockups on the asset side. Closed-end funds exist precisely because that mismatch breaks open-end structures. By keeping buybacks quarterly, ARK is importing closed-end discipline into an onchain wrapper. The 24/7 badge applies to peer-to-peer transfers of the token, not to the fund's obligation to pay investors cash.
This is where the market will learn the price of immediacy. If demand for after-hours exposure runs ahead of sellers, the token can trade at a premium to NAV. If sellers outnumber buyers, it trades at a discount. Venture-focused closed-end vehicles have long traded at wide premiums and discounts to their underlying portfolios; a tokenized ARKVX would create the same arbitrage channel, but with settlement measured in minutes rather than days and with a holder base that can act at any hour.
The mechanism has a second layer. Because the token is divisible and programmable, the fund can be sold in $500 increments without the administrative cost of thousands of tiny paper accounts. That changes the unit economics of distribution: the marginal cost of admitting a $500 investor approaches the marginal cost of admitting a $500,000 one. Over time, that is what opens private-market exposure to retail balance sheets - not the trading-hours badge, but the cost curve.
Why This Is Structural, Not Cyclical
Tokenization of funds is a regime shift, not a sentiment cycle. Three forces make it durable rather than mean-reverting.
First, the infrastructure is already institutional. BlackRock's BUIDL fund - a tokenized money-market product issued on Ethereum through Securitize - reached between $2.5 billion and $3 billion in assets by May 2026, depending on the tracker. Franklin Templeton's tokenized government fund operates across eight blockchains. These are not experiments; they are live balance-sheet products from the two largest mutual-fund families in the United States.
Second, the economics compound. Onchain settlement removes reconciliation layers between the fund, the transfer agent, the custodian and the distributor. Compliance can be programmed into the token itself - a wallet that fails a sanctions or accreditation check simply cannot receive the asset. That is cheaper to enforce in code than in monthly reports, and the cost advantage grows with the number of holders.
Third, the regulatory perimeter is being drawn rather than closed. The New York Stock Exchange filed a proposed rule change in April 2026 to enable trading of securities in tokenized form on the exchange, and the SEC has been working on a framework for around-the-clock trading of tokenized securities. ARK's August filing is structured to fit inside that perimeter: registered alternative trading systems, registered broker-dealers, no decentralized-finance venues. The direction of travel is toward rules, not enforcement actions.
The forecast range captures the disagreement on scale, not direction. Boston Consulting Group and ADDX project $16.1 trillion in tokenized assets by 2030; ARK Invest's own research puts the figure at $11 trillion; Citi's base case is $5.5 trillion, with McKinsey at $1 trillion to $4 trillion and Deutsche Bank at $1.5 trillion to $2 trillion. Even the most conservative estimate implies a multi-fold expansion from the roughly $20 billion of onchain real-world assets tracked in mid-2026, up from about $8 billion at the start of 2024.
The Second-Order Effect: The Winner Is the Flow Data
The first-order story is democratized access. The second-order story is less visible and more valuable: ARK gains real-time visibility into investor flows.
Traditional fund accounting delivers subscription and redemption data with a lag of days. Onchain, every transfer is recorded as it happens. That gives the manager an early read on who is buying, who is selling and how concentrated the holder base is becoming - information that can shape cash buffers, hedging and even positioning decisions before competitors see their own next-day reports. In a fund that holds illiquid private assets, knowing the liquidity profile of your own shareholder base in real time is a risk-management tool, not just a marketing one.
Programmable compliance deepens the advantage. Because the token can enforce transfer restrictions in code, ARK can admit or exclude categories of investors without manual review. Over time, that compliance layer becomes a distribution moat: the fund can be sold through more channels, in more jurisdictions, with less operational friction than a paper share class.
There is also a cross-asset implication that the 24/7 framing obscures. If tokenized fund shares begin trading at persistent premiums or discounts to NAV, an arbitrage channel opens between the onchain token and the underlying portfolio. That spread - not the trading-hours badge - is where the market will actually price the value of immediacy. Watch the token-to-NAV spread; it will tell you whether investors are willing to pay for access outside traditional market hours, and whether the market trusts the manager's marks on the private holdings underneath.
The Counter-Thesis: A Solution Hunting for a Problem
The strongest argument against the deal is straightforward: most investors do not want to trade a venture fund at 2 a.m. Venture capital is patient capital by design. The allocators who want private AI exposure are typically willing to lock up for years; the allocators who want intraday liquidity buy public equities or ETFs. A tokenized venture fund sits between the two and may satisfy neither.
There is also a valuation problem that tokenization cannot solve. Private AI companies are marked by the fund's manager, not discovered by a market. A daily NAV on a portfolio of pre-IPO names is a calculated figure, not a discovered price. Putting that NAV on a blockchain makes it movable faster; it does not make it more accurate. If private AI marks deteriorate, the token will gap down to meet them - 24/7 or not. Continuous trading could even amplify the pain, because the market price would adjust before the next NAV print, telegraphing losses that paper holders do not yet see.
And there is regulatory overhang. ARK's structure depends on exemptive relief that the commission has not yet granted in final form. Exemptive orders can be narrowed, delayed or conditioned - for example, restricted to accredited investors only, which would collapse the $500 retail thesis back into the existing private-placement model. If the SEC limits the quotation mediums or the eligible holder base, the 24/7 promise shrinks materially.
The counter-thesis has force, but it mistakes the objective. ARK is not optimizing this fund for today's liquidity demand; it is positioning for the infrastructure standard of the next decade. Even if 24/7 trading of venture stakes proves niche, the onchain shareholder record, the programmable compliance layer and the proprietary flow data become assets in themselves. The bet is on the rails, not just the fund.
The falsifying signal is specific: if, twelve months after launch, the tokenized shares still trade only at NAV with negligible secondary volume and no premium-or-discount arbitrage activity, the liquidity thesis is dead and this was a distribution experiment rather than a market-structure shift.
Who Wins, Who Is Exposed, and What to Watch
Who benefits first is Securitize: more assets on its rails, and ARK is already an investor. ARK itself benefits through lower distribution costs and richer flow data. Retail investors gain access at $500, but they pay for it with valuation opacity and gated liquidity. Traditional fund administrators and transfer agents are exposed: reconciliation and record-keeping are the exact functions tokenization automates. So are traditional venture funds that charge high minimums for the same private exposure now available at a fraction of the price.
The outlook splits by horizon. In the short term, over the next 6 to 12 months, expect novelty-driven subscriptions, modest secondary volume and heavy regulatory scrutiny. The SEC's decision on the exemptive application is the key catalyst. In the medium term, one to three years, if the token-to-NAV spread develops, arbitrageurs enter and liquidity deepens; if not, the structure remains a niche distribution channel. In the long term, five years and beyond, the shift is structural: onchain shareholder records and programmable compliance become the default for fund issuance, regardless of whether this specific fund trades actively.
Three scenarios frame the path. In the base case, the SEC grants relief with conditions, the fund gathers new assets through the $500 channel, and secondary volume stays thin but the infrastructure proves itself across reporting cycles. In the upside case, private AI names IPO in 2027 or 2028, the fund's NAV re-rates, and the tokenized shares trade at a persistent premium as the cheapest retail access to the AI complex. In the downside case, the SEC narrows the order to accredited investors only, or private AI marks deteriorate, and the token trades at a discount to NAV with no arbitrage to close it.
ARK is not selling 24/7 liquidity. It is selling the rails on which the next generation of funds will be built - and the venture fund is just the first thing running on them.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
