NextFin

DA Davidson Names Nvidia, Google, Microsoft, CoreWeave Among Stocks Set to Benefit from OpenAI Hype

Summarized by NextFin AI
  • DA Davidson analyst Gil Luria identifies Nvidia, Alphabet, Microsoft, and CoreWeave as key beneficiaries of OpenAI's momentum. These companies are positioned to thrive in the evolving AI landscape, which is shifting towards complex autonomous systems.
  • Microsoft's partnership with OpenAI and its Azure platform is expected to drive significant revenue growth. Meanwhile, Alphabet's advancements in AI and proprietary hardware enhance its competitive edge.
  • Nvidia remains the leader in hardware for AI, with its Rubin architecture ensuring a competitive advantage despite concerns over GPU demand. The transition to reasoning models increases inference costs, impacting the overall market.
  • The second half of 2026 will be critical for AI infrastructure providers, as advancements in AI capabilities could lead to significant valuation changes. Any slowdown in performance gains may negatively affect companies heavily invested in infrastructure.

NextFin News - In a comprehensive research note released on February 9, 2026, DA Davidson analyst Gil Luria identified a select group of technology giants and specialized infrastructure players poised to capitalize on the sustained momentum surrounding OpenAI. The firm named Nvidia, Alphabet (Google), Microsoft, and CoreWeave as the primary beneficiaries of what Luria describes as a "virtuous cycle" of AI development. This endorsement comes as OpenAI continues to push the boundaries of large language models, shifting the industry focus from simple chatbots to complex, autonomous "agentic" systems that require exponentially more processing power and tighter software-hardware integration.

According to Business Insider, Luria’s analysis suggests that the "OpenAI hype" is no longer merely speculative but is grounded in the massive infrastructure requirements of the next generation of models. Microsoft remains the most obvious beneficiary due to its multi-billion dollar partnership and exclusive cloud rights, but the inclusion of Alphabet and CoreWeave signals a broadening of the ecosystem. Alphabet’s recent advancements in its Gemini models and its proprietary TPU (Tensor Processing Unit) infrastructure allow it to compete directly while also benefiting from the general rising tide of AI adoption. Meanwhile, CoreWeave has emerged as a critical "GPU-as-a-service" provider, recently announcing it will be among the first to deploy Nvidia’s Rubin platform in the second half of 2026 to meet the specific needs of OpenAI and its peers.

The fundamental driver behind this bullish outlook is the transition toward "reasoning" models. Unlike earlier iterations of generative AI that focused on pattern matching, the current trajectory involves models that can plan, execute multi-step tasks, and self-correct. This shift significantly increases the "inference" cost—the energy and compute required to run a model after it has been trained. Nvidia remains the undisputed king of this hardware layer. Despite concerns regarding a potential peak in GPU demand, Luria argues that the roadmap for Nvidia’s Rubin architecture, which U.S. President Trump’s administration has viewed as a key component of national technological competitiveness, ensures that the company stays two steps ahead of competitors.

However, the analysis also highlights a growing tension between massive capital expenditure and realized returns. CoreWeave, for instance, saw its stock (CRWV) experience volatility in early February as investors weighed its rapid revenue growth against "lofty leverage" and heavy spending. Luria, who was previously a critic of the stock, upgraded CoreWeave to Neutral from Underperform, raising his price target to $68. He noted that while the company is a "high-beta proxy" for AI spending, the "inevitable reckoning" will only occur if the returns on these massive investments stay below the cost of capital. For now, the sheer volume of demand from OpenAI and its competitors is keeping the utilization rates of these data centers at record highs.

From a strategic perspective, Microsoft and Alphabet represent the "platform" play. By integrating OpenAI’s capabilities (or their own equivalent) into enterprise workflows, they are locking in high-margin software revenue that justifies their multi-billion dollar hardware outlays. Microsoft’s Azure has seen a significant portion of its growth attributed directly to AI services, a trend that Luria expects to accelerate as agentic AI becomes a standard feature in Office 365 and GitHub. Alphabet’s advantage lies in its vertical integration; by designing its own chips and owning the world’s most popular search and video platforms, it can optimize the cost of AI delivery in a way that few others can match.

Looking ahead, the market is entering a phase where the "hype" must be backed by tangible productivity gains. The second half of 2026 will be a critical litmus test as Nvidia’s Rubin chips hit the market and OpenAI is expected to debut its next major architectural leap. If these advancements lead to the promised "agentic" revolution—where AI can autonomously manage schedules, write code, and conduct research—the valuations of the "OpenAI Four" may still have significant room to run. Conversely, any slowdown in model performance gains could lead to a sharp re-rating of the infrastructure providers who have borrowed heavily to build out the current capacity.

Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.

Insights

What are the origins and technical principles behind OpenAI's models?

What is the current market situation for companies like Nvidia and Microsoft in AI development?

What recent updates have occurred regarding Nvidia's Rubin architecture?

How might the integration of AI into enterprise workflows evolve in the next few years?

What challenges do companies face in balancing capital expenditure and returns in the AI sector?

How does CoreWeave compare to its competitors in the GPU-as-a-service market?

What are the implications of Microsoft's partnership with OpenAI for its cloud services?

What recent advancements has Alphabet made in its AI capabilities?

How do the pricing strategies of AI infrastructure providers impact market competition?

What are the long-term impacts of AI's transition to reasoning models?

What controversies exist around the capital investments in AI infrastructure?

How do the performance gains of OpenAI's models affect investor confidence in AI stocks?

What role do data centers play in the current AI infrastructure landscape?

How might Nvidia's future developments impact its competitive position in the chip industry?

What lessons can be drawn from historical cases of tech investment volatility?

What are the potential risks associated with heavy borrowing by infrastructure providers?

How does the AI hype cycle influence technology stock valuations?

What factors are driving the demand for AI processing power among major tech companies?

What might a slowdown in AI model performance mean for infrastructure stocks?

How do Microsoft and Alphabet's strategies differ regarding AI integration?

Search
NextFinNextFin
NextFin.Al
No Noise, only Signal.
Open App