NextFin News - The Danish Security and Intelligence Service (PET) has officially categorized the United States as a primary source of threat to Greenland’s internal stability, placing the long-standing NATO ally on the same level as traditional adversaries Russia and China. According to Berlingske, the intelligence agency’s latest assessment warns that U.S. President Trump’s overt interest in acquiring Greenland has transformed the island into a focal point for sophisticated influence campaigns designed to exploit political divisions between Copenhagen and Nuuk.
The report, released on January 23, 2026, highlights a significant shift in the Nordic security landscape. PET asserts that the intensified competition among great powers in the Arctic has made Greenland a target for "influence campaigns" from Russia, China, and the United States. These operations, according to the agency, aim to create discord within the Danish Realm by leveraging existing social grievances or fabricating new ones. Intelligence officials are particularly concerned about the use of social media platforms like Facebook—where 80% of Greenland’s population is active—to spread disinformation and promote secessionist sentiments that align with Washington’s strategic interests.
This intelligence warning comes in the immediate wake of a volatile diplomatic standoff. Since the beginning of 2026, U.S. President Trump has intensified his demands for the United States to take ownership of Greenland, citing its vast mineral wealth and strategic position for Arctic shipping. The rhetoric escalated to threats of 25% tariffs on European allies and the refusal to rule out military force. However, during the World Economic Forum in Davos on January 21, 2026, U.S. President Trump pivoted, announcing a "concept of a deal" with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. While he ruled out immediate military action and suspended the proposed tariffs, he maintained that the U.S. is seeking "immediate negotiations" for the island's acquisition.
The analytical implications of PET’s assessment suggest a fundamental breakdown in the traditional "Arctic Exceptionalism"—the idea that the region could remain a zone of low tension. By equating U.S. influence with Russian and Chinese subversion, Danish intelligence is signaling that the transactional nature of the current U.S. administration’s foreign policy is viewed as a corrosive force to sovereign integrity. Jacob Kaarsbo, a former chief analyst at the Danish Defence Intelligence Service, noted that the PET statement, while diplomatically phrased, reflects a deep-seated anxiety that the U.S. is no longer merely a protector but a predator in the eyes of its smaller allies.
From a data-driven perspective, the economic stakes are immense. Greenland holds some of the world’s largest deposits of rare earth elements (REEs), including neodymium and praseodymium, which are critical for the global energy transition. Currently, China controls approximately 85% of the world’s REE processing capacity. The U.S. drive for Greenland is largely an attempt to break this monopoly. However, the PET report suggests that the "HOW" of this pursuit—using influence operations to bypass Danish sovereignty—is creating a security vacuum. If the U.S. succeeds in driving a wedge between Denmark and Greenland, it may inadvertently provide an opening for Russia to further militarize its Northern Sea Route under the guise of regional instability.
Looking forward, the "Davos Framework" mentioned by U.S. President Trump is likely to be a temporary truce rather than a permanent resolution. The intelligence community predicts that the U.S. will continue to utilize "soft power" and economic incentives to encourage Greenlandic independence, which would then allow for a direct bilateral agreement between Washington and Nuuk. This strategy, often referred to as "transactionalism," poses a long-term challenge to the NATO alliance structure. As the U.S. continues to view Greenland through the lens of real estate and resource security, the Danish intelligence community is expected to increase its surveillance of U.S. diplomatic and NGO activities within the territory, marking a historic low in bilateral trust between these two Arctic partners.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
