NextFin News - The European Union is currently deliberating a historic shift in its Middle Eastern policy as member states consider the formal designation of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organization. According to Corriere della Sera, Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani announced on January 26, 2026, that Italy will formally propose this designation at the upcoming European Council meeting this Thursday. The move comes in direct response to what Tajani described as a "carnage" in Iran, where thousands of anti-government protesters have reportedly been killed by security forces since late December 2025.
The diplomatic escalation was triggered by harrowing evidence of state-led violence. Verified video footage obtained by the BBC reveals the scale of the crackdown, showing hospitals overwhelmed with casualties, snipers positioned on urban rooftops, and the systematic destruction of surveillance infrastructure by demonstrators. Human rights organizations, including the Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA), have reported nearly 6,000 confirmed deaths, while other groups like Iran Human Rights (IHR) warn the actual toll could exceed 25,000. In response to Italy’s vocal support for the designation, Tehran summoned Italian Ambassador Paola Amadei to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to lodge a formal protest, signaling a rapid deterioration in bilateral relations.
This European shift aligns with the "maximum pressure" doctrine revived by U.S. President Trump. Since his inauguration on January 20, 2025, U.S. President Trump has deployed a massive naval task force to the region, including the USS Abraham Lincoln, to deter Iranian aggression. While U.S. President Trump has stated that diplomacy remains an option because Tehran "wants to reach an agreement," he has simultaneously tasked his administration with preparing "decisive" military options. The convergence of EU sanctions and U.S. military posturing represents a pincer movement designed to isolate the Iranian leadership both economically and strategically.
The internal economic situation in Iran has reached a breaking point, serving as the primary catalyst for the unrest. According to Reuters, a near-total internet blackout imposed by Tehran since January 8 has paralyzed the domestic economy, causing estimated daily losses between 16.5 million and 24.8 million euros. The Iranian rial has plummeted to record lows, and annual inflation has surged past 42%, with food prices rising by over 70% year-over-year. This economic collapse has bridged the gap between different social strata, uniting bazaar merchants with student activists in a shared demand for systemic change.
From an analytical perspective, the EU’s potential designation of the IRGC as a terrorist group marks the end of the "constructive engagement" era. For years, European capitals—particularly Paris, Berlin, and Rome—resisted such a move to preserve the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and maintain channels for energy security. However, the IRGC’s dual role as a domestic suppressive force and a regional proxy coordinator has made the status quo untenable. If the designation is adopted, it will trigger mandatory asset freezes and criminalize any financial interaction with IRGC-linked entities, which currently control an estimated 30% to 40% of the Iranian economy.
The geopolitical implications are profound. A formal terrorist label would likely lead to the total withdrawal of European firms still operating in Iran, fearing secondary sanctions from the U.S. Treasury. Furthermore, it could provoke the IRGC to escalate its activities in the Strait of Hormuz or increase its support for the "Axis of Resistance" in Iraq, Lebanon, and Yemen. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has already warned in the Wall Street Journal that any further attacks would result in a "total confrontation" that would engulf the entire region.
Looking ahead, the success of this pressure campaign depends on the cohesion of the international community. While the U.S. and EU are moving toward a unified front, regional powers like Saudi Arabia and the UAE have expressed caution, fearing that a cornered Tehran might resort to asymmetric warfare. The coming weeks will determine whether this coordinated isolation forces the Iranian leadership to the negotiating table or triggers a broader regional conflict. For investors and global markets, the primary risk remains a disruption in the energy corridor, as any IRGC retaliation in the Persian Gulf could send oil prices into a volatile spike, complicating the global inflation outlook for 2026.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
