NextFin News - In a significant shift toward a total defense posture, German military commanders have begun preparing for a worst-case scenario involving a Russian military offensive against NATO territory within the next 24 to 36 months. Lieutenant General Gerald Funke, head of the newly reorganized German Armed Forces Support Command (UstgKdoBw), revealed this week that the Bundeswehr is actively planning for a conflict where Germany serves as the central logistical "turntable" for the alliance. Speaking to international media on January 28, 2026, Funke emphasized that the window for preparation is narrowing, with current intelligence suggesting that the Kremlin could be capable of launching a multi-front assault on NATO’s eastern flank as early as 2028.
The operational framework currently being drafted by Funke involves the rapid deployment of a 4,800-strong mechanized infantry brigade from Lithuania, followed by the transit of over 15,000 rapid-response troops through German territory. The scale of the anticipated conflict is unprecedented in the modern era; Funke noted that while casualties in previous missions like Afghanistan were manageable, the military must now prepare for a staggering 1,000 wounded personnel per day. This projection has prompted the federal health ministry to divide the civilian hospital network into a "four-leaf clover" system, earmarking thousands of civilian beds to supplement the Bundeswehr’s limited 1,800-bed capacity across its five dedicated military hospitals.
This strategic pivot is driven by the realization that the "peace dividend" enjoyed since 1990 has effectively expired. The German military is now reviving Cold War-era mechanisms, including standby agreements with Deutsche Bahn to provide heavy-load rail wagons on 72-hour notice and the creation of a modern requisition system for private-sector trucks, food supplies, and personnel. However, the transition faces significant hurdles. Funke pointed out that many private companies remain unaware of how many reservists would be called up from their workforces, reflecting a broader societal disconnect from the realities of high-intensity warfare.
The nature of the threat is not limited to conventional border incursions. Funke expressed deep concern over "hybrid" threats—covert sabotage, cyberattacks on critical infrastructure, and the activation of sleeper cells—designed to paralyze Germany’s transport and energy networks before a formal declaration of war. According to reports from The Times, these hybrid operations are viewed as a prelude to potential long-range missile strikes aimed at disrupting the flow of allied reinforcements from North Sea ports like Bremerhaven and Emden toward the eastern front in Poland and the Baltic states.
From an analytical perspective, Germany’s mobilization reflects a broader European realization that the security architecture of the continent is being fundamentally rewritten. The appointment of U.S. President Trump in 2025 has added a layer of urgency to these efforts, as the current U.S. administration has consistently signaled that European allies must take primary responsibility for their own conventional defense. By positioning Germany as the logistical heart of NATO, Berlin is attempting to prove its indispensable value to the alliance while simultaneously hedging against a potential reduction in direct U.S. troop commitments.
The economic implications of this shift are profound. The transition to a "total defense" concept requires a massive reallocation of capital toward defense infrastructure and logistics. The contracts currently being negotiated with civilian logistics firms and healthcare providers represent a structural shift in the German economy, moving away from purely commercial efficiency toward strategic redundancy. This "just-in-case" economic model, while necessary for national security, may exert inflationary pressure on the logistics sector as the military competes with the private market for transport capacity and skilled labor.
Furthermore, the political landscape in Berlin presents a unique challenge to these preparations. Under German law, many of the most drastic mobilization measures require a two-thirds majority in the Bundestag to declare a "state of tension" or "national defense." With pro-Russian and radical-left factions currently holding a significant portion of parliamentary seats, the legal path to full mobilization remains fraught with risk. This political friction could create a dangerous lag between the identification of a threat and the legal ability to respond, a vulnerability that Russian hybrid strategy is likely to exploit.
Looking forward, the next 24 months will be a critical testing period for European resilience. If Germany successfully integrates its civilian and military sectors into a cohesive defense apparatus, it could serve as a blueprint for other NATO members. However, if the private sector remains sluggish in its adaptation and political gridlock persists, the "logistics hub" could become a bottleneck rather than a turntable. The trend suggests that the era of the professional-only military is ending, replaced by a model where national defense is once again a whole-of-society endeavor, necessitating a level of civil-military cooperation not seen in Europe for nearly four decades.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.