NextFin News - Goldman Sachs has revised its forecast for the Federal Reserve’s easing cycle, pushing back the expected timing of the next two interest rate cuts by a full quarter as persistent inflation and geopolitical volatility complicate the central bank’s path. According to a research note released on Saturday, the bank now anticipates the first of these cuts will not arrive until December 2026, followed by a second move in March 2027. This shift marks a significant departure from earlier projections that had penciled in a more aggressive return to lower rates by the autumn of this year.
The adjustment follows a string of economic data suggesting that the "last mile" of the inflation fight is proving more arduous than many on Wall Street had initially hoped. While the labor market has shown signs of cooling, energy prices remain a volatile variable in the Fed’s calculus. Brent crude oil is currently trading at $101.29 per barrel, a level that continues to exert upward pressure on headline inflation figures and complicates the U.S. President Trump administration’s efforts to stabilize domestic energy costs. The ongoing conflict in the Middle East has transformed the economic landscape into one defined by supply-side shocks rather than traditional demand-driven cycles.
Jan Hatzius, the chief economist at Goldman Sachs, has long been regarded as one of the more optimistic voices on the "soft landing" narrative, often maintaining a more dovish stance than his peers during the height of the tightening cycle. However, this latest pivot toward a "higher-for-longer" reality suggests that even the most resilient bulls are acknowledging the structural hurdles facing the Federal Reserve. Hatzius and his team argue that while the risk of a near-term rate hike is overblown, the window for easing has effectively been shuttered by the need to ensure inflation expectations remain anchored amidst high energy costs.
This outlook is far from a consensus view on Wall Street. While Goldman Sachs has moved its expectations to the end of the year, other major brokerages continue to hold out for a mid-2026 pivot. For instance, several sell-side firms still anticipate a September cut, citing a softening in wage growth that they believe will eventually override the noise in energy markets. The divergence in these forecasts highlights a growing split among analysts over whether the Fed should prioritize the cooling labor market or the stubbornness of consumer price indices. From the current vantage point, the Goldman Sachs position represents a more cautious, data-dependent scenario that assumes no immediate relief from geopolitical tensions.
The Federal Reserve’s dual mandate is currently under its greatest strain since the post-pandemic recovery. U.S. President Trump has frequently called for lower rates to support industrial growth, yet the central bank remains insulated by its need to prevent a 1970s-style inflation spiral. The risk for Goldman’s new timeline is twofold: a sudden resolution to the Iran conflict could collapse oil prices and pull forward the easing cycle, while a further escalation could force the Fed to consider the very hikes that Hatzius currently deems unlikely. For now, the market is left to navigate a landscape where the cost of borrowing remains a heavy anchor on capital expenditure through the end of the year.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
