NextFin

People Losing Out on Home Equity: Brown Harris CEO Warns of a Trapped-Wealth Market

Summarized by NextFin AI
  • American homeowners hold nearly $17 trillion in equity, with about $11 trillion tappable, but cash-out refinancing is largely shut off as the 30-year fixed mortgage averaged 7.40% on October 15, 2026, over a point above most owners' locked-in rates.
  • Equity distribution is moderating and diverging: equity-rich mortgaged properties fell to 43.3% in Q1 2026 from 44.6%, while seriously underwater homes rose to 3.2%, with weakness concentrated in Southern states like Louisiana and metros such as Jackson and Baltimore.
  • The lock-in effect reshaped equity access: with nearly 80% of homeowners below current rates and existing-home sales 22% below 2019, Q1 2026 saw $47 billion in equity withdrawals, 54% via second liens, and HELOC balances hit $446 billion.
  • The Fed tightened into a frozen market, raising the funds target to 3.75%-4.00% on September 16, 2026, while HELOC serious delinquency held at 1.15%; the prudence narrative breaks if delinquency exceeds 2.5% or the equity-rich share falls below 40%.

NextFin News - American homeowners are sitting on nearly $17 trillion of home equity, one of the largest pools of household wealth in the country, yet millions cannot touch it without destroying the single most valuable financial contract most of them own. Bess Freedman, chief executive of Brown Harris Stevens, framed the tension in an interview published October 16: people are losing out on their home equity. The reason is not that the equity has vanished. It is that the mechanism for monetizing it — the cash-out refinance — has been shut off by mortgage rates that now sit more than a full percentage point above the rates most owners locked in during the 2020-2022 borrowing boom. The 30-year fixed-rate mortgage averaged 7.40% as of October 15, 2026, up from 6.27% a year earlier, according to Freddie Mac's Primary Mortgage Market Survey. That gap has split the housing market into two classes of owner: those who can afford to stay put and preserve their equity, and those who need it but cannot reach it.

The Equity Is Real. The Access Is Not.

The scale of the trapped wealth is not in dispute. Homeowners continue to hold nearly $17 trillion in total equity, with approximately $11 trillion considered "tappable" — the portion lenders generally allow owners to borrow against while leaving a 25% ownership cushion intact, according to Intercontinental Exchange's Mortgage Monitor. That is one of the largest pools of household wealth in the United States, and for most families the home remains their single biggest financial asset.

But the headline number conceals a market that is moderating and, in places, deteriorating. ATTOM's first-quarter 2026 Home Equity and Underwater Report, released May 7, found that 43.3% of mortgaged residential properties were equity-rich — meaning combined loan balances were no more than half of estimated market value. That was down from 44.6% in the previous quarter and the lowest rate since the fourth quarter of 2021. The share of seriously underwater homes — loans at least 25% more than the property's value — rose to 3.2% of mortgaged properties, up from 3.0% in the prior quarter and 2.8% a year earlier.

The moderation is broad. The equity-rich share fell quarter-over-quarter in 93 of the 107 metropolitan areas ATTOM analyzed — 87% of the country — and fell year-over-year in 92 of them. The seriously underwater rate rose in 44 states and the District of Columbia on a quarterly basis and in 45 states plus D.C. year-over-year. The weakest markets are concentrated in the South: Louisiana led the nation with 11.8% of mortgaged properties seriously underwater, followed by Kentucky at 8.5%, Mississippi at 8.0%, Oklahoma at 6.6%, and Arkansas at 6.4%. At the metro level, Baton Rouge (17.4%), New Orleans (19.1%), Little Rock (23.7%), Jackson, Mississippi (25.6%), and Baltimore (26.9%) had the lowest shares of equity-rich homes.

"Homeowner equity remains relatively strong overall, but we're seeing signs of moderation," said Rob Barber, chief executive of ATTOM. "As mortgage rates have risen and home prices have cooled, the share of equity-rich homes has declined in most markets while the rate of seriously underwater properties is edging up across much of the country."

So the setup is a market rich in equity but increasingly unequal in its distribution — and governed by a barrier that no amount of prudence can overcome. The equity exists on paper. Turning it into cash requires either selling the home or refinancing the mortgage, and both doors are heavy.

The Lock-In Effect Broke the Traditional Exit

For most of the last decade, the standard way to reach home equity was a cash-out refinance: replace the existing mortgage with a larger one and pocket the difference. In 2026, that path has collapsed for the roughly 80% of homeowners whose mortgages sit below current market rates. Goldman Sachs' Mid-Year 2026 Housing Outlook estimated that nearly 80% of American homeowners are locked into mortgage rates below today's levels, keeping existing-home sales 22% below 2019 volumes even as the median existing-home price reached an all-time high of $446,400 in June, according to National Association of Realtors data.

The arithmetic is unforgiving. A homeowner who locked in a 3% mortgage during the pandemic boom and refinances today at 7.40% more than doubles the interest cost on the entire balance, not just the cash they pull out. Freedom Mortgage estimates that more than 80% of current homeowners carry mortgages below 6%. Realtor.com reported in July that the average monthly payment for existing mortgage holders hit a record $2,023. Refinancing to access equity is not a liquidity decision; it is a financial self-harm decision for anyone who does not need to move.

The result is what researchers call the lock-in effect, and it has become the defining feature of the 2026 housing market. "The housing market continues to be defined by the lock-in effect," said Andy Walden, head of mortgage and housing market research at Intercontinental Exchange. "Millions of homeowners are sitting on first mortgages with rates well below current market levels, making second liens and HELOCs an attractive way to access equity without giving up those loans."

That substitution — away from refinancing and toward second liens — is the clearest signal of where the market has moved. In the first quarter of 2026, homeowners withdrew an estimated $47 billion in equity, the highest first-quarter total since 2021, according to ICE's June 2026 Mortgage Monitor. For the first time in years, the majority — 54% — came through second liens such as home equity lines of credit and home equity loans rather than cash-out refinances. Second-lien withdrawals reached their strongest first-quarter volume in nearly two decades. HELOC balances rose for a 16th straight quarter to $446 billion as of the first quarter of 2026, $129 billion above the low reached in the first quarter of 2022, according to the New York Fed's Household Debt and Credit data. Roughly 3.9 million homeowners who took out mortgages in the 2020-2022 window have since added a second lien.

On the surface, the market has adapted. Owners are not being denied access to their wealth; they are choosing a different door. But the substitution carries a cost that the headline equity figure does not show.

The Second-Lien Workaround Is More Expensive — and Riskier

A second lien is not a refinance. It is a new loan stacked on top of the old one, almost always at a higher interest rate than the first mortgage, with a shorter amortization and, in the case of a HELOC, often an interest-only draw period that defers principal repayment. Homeowners who use it to preserve a 3% first mortgage are making a rational trade at the margin — but they are converting home equity from a low-cost safety valve into higher-cost debt.

The distinction matters because it changes what "accessing equity" means. A cash-out refinance in a falling-rate environment let owners consolidate debt at a lower blended cost. A second lien in a rising-rate environment lets owners keep their cheap first mortgage but adds a new, expensive obligation on top of it. For a household stretching to cover monthly costs — 91.2% of homeowners in Hometap's 2025 survey agreed that homeownership costs are outpacing income — the second lien is less a wealth-management tool than a liquidity bridge. Only 6.2% of those surveyed had even explored home equity financing as a way to relieve financial stress, suggesting most owners still treat tapping equity as a last resort.

"As refinance opportunities become more limited, home equity products are playing a larger role in helping homeowners access liquidity and meet financial goals," said Bob Hart, president of ICE Mortgage Technology.

The phrasing is revealing: home equity products are filling a gap that refinancing used to fill. When the cheaper tool disappears, the more expensive tool becomes the default.

The risk is not evenly distributed. Second liens are subordinate to the first mortgage, which means in a downturn the second-lien lender absorbs losses first — and the borrower faces a higher probability of being pushed underwater on the combined debt. ATTOM's data shows where the cushion is thinnest: in the metros with the lowest equity-rich shares, a modest price decline can flip a household from equity-rich to equity-poor without any change in behavior. The equity that owners are borrowing against today is the same equity that could compress tomorrow if prices cool further in those markets.

There is also a credit-quality signal worth watching. The flow into serious delinquency for home equity lines of credit held at 1.15% in the second quarter of 2026, unchanged from a year earlier, according to the New York Fed — benign for now, but the first place a stressed homeowner shows strain. If that figure begins to climb while equity cushions thin, the second-lien surge stops looking like prudent liquidity management and starts looking like a bridge built over shrinking ground.

A Market Split in Two

The geography of home equity in 2026 is a map of divergence. The states with the highest shares of equity-rich homes are overwhelmingly in the Northeast and West: Vermont led at 85.7%, followed by New Hampshire (58.1%), Montana (57.7%), Rhode Island (57.2%), and Hawaii (55.8%). At the metro level, San Jose (65.2%), Los Angeles (59.3%), San Diego (58.2%), Portland, Maine (57.9%), and Buffalo (56.7%) topped the list. These are markets where owners can afford to stay put because their balance sheets can absorb the rate shock.

The opposite end of the map tells a different story. Louisiana, Kentucky, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Arkansas carry the highest seriously underwater rates, and their metro anchors — Baton Rouge, New Orleans, Little Rock, Jackson, Baltimore — have the thinnest equity cushions in the country. In these markets, the "losing out" dynamic is not about prudence; it is about a lack of usable equity at all. A household in Jackson, Mississippi, where the seriously underwater rate is 10.4% and the equity-rich rate is 25.6%, faces a fundamentally different set of choices than a homeowner in San Jose.

This bifurcation is the second-order consequence of the lock-in effect that most commentary misses. The freeze does not merely suppress transactions. It sorts owners by balance-sheet strength and by geography, and it hardens that sorting into a durable feature of the market. Owners with thick equity and low rates can wait, can tap selectively, and can preserve wealth. Owners with thin equity and high carrying costs cannot wait, cannot tap cheaply, and watch their cushion erode quarter by quarter.

The Federal Reserve Just Made It Harder

Into this frozen market, the Federal Reserve moved rates in the wrong direction. On September 16, 2026, the Federal Open Market Committee voted unanimously to raise the federal funds target range by 25 basis points to 3.75%-4.00% — the first rate increase since July 2023, following a series of cuts through 2024 and 2025 that had taken the range down to 3.50%-3.75% in December 2025. The median FOMC participant projected one additional 25-basis-point hike to end 2026 at 4.1%, no change in 2027, and cuts in 2028 and 2029 to 3.9% and 3.6% respectively.

The transmission from the fed funds rate to mortgage rates is not mechanical, but the direction is clear: a central bank tightening into a housing market already paralyzed by rate lock-in raises the cost of every marginal decision — moving, refinancing, tapping equity, or buying. Existing-home sales are already 22% below 2019 levels. A further rate increase widens the gap between the rate an owner holds and the rate the market offers, deepening the lock-in rather than relieving it.

The policy question is whether the Fed is treating housing as a lagging indicator that will catch up to disinflation, or as a frozen market that cannot adjust without relief. The September dot plot suggests the latter concern is not yet priced into policy: the median sees rates holding at 4.1% through 2027. For homeowners living the lock-in effect, 2027 is a long time to be locked out of their own wealth.

The Counter-Argument: Owners Are Being Prudent, Not Trapped

The strongest case against the "losing out" framing is that homeowners are not trapped — they are exercising discipline. Equity remains historically strong: 43.3% of mortgaged properties are equity-rich, a level that would have been extraordinary in any pre-2020 year. The roughly $11 trillion tappable pool is real, and the second-lien market is functioning well enough to deliver $47 billion in a single quarter. From this vantage point, owners are doing exactly what rational actors should do: refusing to surrender a 3% mortgage to chase liquidity, using second liens sparingly, and waiting for rates to fall. The lock-in effect, in this reading, is not a market failure; it is a market working as designed, protecting owners from a bad refinance decision.

There is truth in this. A cash-out refinance at 7.40% would indeed be financial self-harm for a 3% borrower, and the shift to second liens shows owners understand the trade. But prudence is not the same as access. The counter-argument describes the behavior of owners who have options. It does not describe the household in a thin-equity metro that needs liquidity and faces only expensive, subordinate debt — or the seller who cannot list because moving would double their financing cost, or the buyer priced out by a median home price at a record high while rates sit above 7%.

The falsifying test is concrete. If the flow into serious delinquency for HELOCs stays near its current 1.15% while the equity-rich share stabilizes above 43%, then the "prudent tap" narrative holds: owners are managing wealth, not losing it. But if second-lien delinquency flows climb above 2.5% for two consecutive quarters, or if the national equity-rich share falls below 40%, the prudence story breaks. At that point, the second-lien surge is not evidence of a functioning market; it is evidence that owners are borrowing against a cushion that is shrinking beneath them.

What to Watch

Short term (next 6-12 months): Watch the second-lien data. The Q1 2026 surge to $47 billion in equity withdrawals — the strongest first-quarter pace since 2021 — sets a high bar. If second-lien originations cool as rates hold near 7.40%, it suggests owners are reaching the limit of their appetite for stacked debt. If they accelerate, it signals growing reliance on expensive liquidity.

Medium term (1-3 years): Watch the equity-rich share and the seriously underwater rate from ATTOM's quarterly reports. The base case is continued moderation: equity-rich gradually drifting toward 40% as prices normalize and rates stay elevated. The upside case is a rate decline toward 6% — the level the National Association of Realtors has forecast for 2026 — which would thaw refinancing and unlock inventory. The downside case is a price correction in the thin-cushion South, which would convert today's equity-rich owners into tomorrow's underwater ones.

Long term (3+ years): The lock-in effect is structural, not cyclical. It will not self-correct until the stock of sub-4% mortgages amortizes or turns over through sale, death, or refinance — a process measured in years, not quarters. That means the bifurcated market — thick-equity owners who can wait versus thin-equity owners who cannot — is likely to persist through the current cycle. The Fed's projected 2028-2029 cuts may ease the margin, but they will not erase a seven-year rate gap overnight.

The signal that would prove this judgment wrong is equally specific: if existing-home sales recover to within 10% of 2019 levels while mortgage rates remain above 7%, the lock-in effect is fading faster than the mortgage-stock math suggests — likely because price declines, not rate declines, are restoring affordability. That would be a different, and darker, resolution to the same problem.

The home equity story of 2026 is not that Americans have lost wealth. It is that the wealth is there, on paper, behind a door that only some owners can open. For the rest, the equity is real — and out of reach. That is what it means to be locked in: not trapped in a home, but locked out of the largest asset you own.

Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.

Search, ask or analyze anything...