NextFin News - India's commodity derivatives market doubled in a single year, yet the country's securities regulator is rewriting the rulebook anyway. The Securities and Exchange Board of India has opened consultations on settlement pricing, position limits, stress testing, and foreign participation — a package built on a blunt diagnosis: the volume is real, but the liquidity that institutions need is not there yet.
The gap between turnover and depth is now the central question in India's commodity markets, and the answer will determine whether the 2025-26 surge becomes a durable market or another speculative cycle that leaves little behind.
The Boom That Does Not Feel Like Depth
On the surface, the numbers are a success story. In the 2025-26 financial year, all-India commodity futures turnover rose 133.1% to ₹166.4 trillion, while options notional jumped 140.3% to ₹1,221.7 trillion, according to SEBI's secondary-markets report published in August 2026. Premium turnover climbed 107.2% to ₹16.8 trillion. Multi Commodity Exchange alone accounted for ₹164.9 trillion in futures turnover, up 135.4%, and roughly 98.9% of the entire market's activity.
But concentration is the first clue that the boom is narrower than the headline suggests. Non-agricultural commodities made up 99.9% of turnover. Agriculture — the segment with the most natural hedgers, from farmers to food processors — accounted for less than 1%. BSE, once a second venue, recorded zero commodity derivatives turnover in the year. The market is growing, but it is growing where speculation concentrates, not where risk actually lives.
SEBI chairman Tuhin Kanta Pandey has been explicit about the gap. At the Global Commodity Conclave in Mumbai in August 2026, he said the regulator was assessing measures to enhance participation, liquidity, and volume, pointing to a consultation paper on foreign portfolio investor access to exchange-traded commodity derivatives. The message sharpened at the Commodity and Capital Market Participants Association of India's convention in New Delhi:
We also want deeper and more liquid cash markets, wider participation, stronger securities borrowing and lending. And efficient hedging and arbitrage can improve price discovery and strengthen the interaction between cash and derivatives market.
The reform package now on the table touches four levers: settlement price mechanics for expiry days, including the Closing Auction Session framework, with public comments due October 3, 2026; client-level position limits for agricultural commodities, revised in a September 9, 2026 circular; stress-testing requirements, updated on August 12, 2026; and foreign portfolio investor access to non-agricultural commodity derivatives, permitted in September 2026 with delivery and exit safeguards. Each measure targets a different friction point. Together they amount to an admission that volume alone is not liquidity.
Why Turnover Is Not the Same Thing as Liquidity
Liquidity is not measured by how much changes hands. It is measured by how much can move without moving the price. A market can print enormous turnover while remaining shallow if the same pool of traders churns the same contracts, if benchmarks are unreliable, or if the participants who could absorb large orders — mutual funds, insurers, foreign investors — cannot enter without taking on operational risk they do not understand.
That is the diagnosis behind SEBI's settlement-price review. Pandey framed it plainly:
After introducing the Closing Auction Session (CAS), we are examining concerns relating to the settlement price framework for derivatives on expiry days.
The CAS replaced a VWAP-based close with a call auction that clears all orders at a single equilibrium price. The intent was to make the close harder to manipulate. The follow-up question is whether the settlement price that derivatives expire against is robust enough for large institutions to hedge against it without tracking error.
The chairman spelled out the mutual-fund problem in Mumbai:
Mutual funds--there is a need for a reliable benchmark price for them now... Before this, whatever system was in place had an issue where trades coming in towards the close carried a high probability of manipulation.
A passive fund tracking a commodity index cannot afford a benchmark that gaps at the close. Until the benchmark is trusted, the fund stays out — and the market stays retail-heavy.
Early signs suggest the fix is working in the direction SEBI intended. Pandey noted that price differences since August 3 had
reduced significantly in both the Sensex and NSE, adding:
We believe the participation and the effectiveness of showing indicative prices will settle.
The same logic now extends to commodity settlement prices.
The mechanism here is simple but easy to miss. Settlement prices are the reference point for every hedge, every index fund, and every structured product. If that reference point wobbles, the cost of using the market rises faster than the headline turnover suggests. Fixing it does not create volume tomorrow; it lowers the entry cost for capital that measures risk in basis points, not in lots.
Position Limits: Loosening the Leash Without Losing Control
The second lever is position limits. In a circular dated September 9, 2026, SEBI doubled client-level limits for agricultural commodities: broad commodities now allow positions up to 2% of deliverable supply, narrow commodities 1%, and sensitive commodities 0.5%, up from 1%, 0.5%, and 0.25% respectively. The definition of a broad commodity was also relaxed. Previously an agricultural commodity had to meet both a quantity and a value test. Now it qualifies if it is not sensitive and meets either a five-year average deliverable supply of at least 10 lakh metric tonnes or a value of at least ₹5,000 crore.
The change responds to a complaint that has run through stakeholder submissions for years: genuine hedgers were being capped out of the market. A food processor with a large physical exposure could hit the old limit and be forced to hedge off-exchange, in the opaque over-the-counter market, defeating the purpose of a public price-discovery venue. SEBI's own working group on agricultural commodity norms, the Commodity Derivatives Advisory Committee, and public comments all pointed in the same direction.
SEBI paired the loosening with a graduated penalty structure. A breach of up to 2% above the prescribed limit now draws a penalty capped at ₹10,000; a breach exceeding 2% is penalized at the lower of a calculated amount or ₹2 lakh, computed on the excess position, closing price, and number of days the violation persisted. Members must reduce the excess by the next trading day, and repeated violations can land a broker in forced square-off mode. The design is deliberate: small, inadvertent overruns are treated as administrative errors, while repeated or large breaches remain expensive.
The risk in doubling limits is the mirror image of the problem they solve. More capacity for large players means more capacity for concentration. With MCX already at 98.9% market share and non-agri at 99.9%, a few well-capitalized accounts can dominate price action in a thin contract. The safeguard is that limits remain tied to deliverable supply — a real-world anchor — rather than notional turnover.
Foreign Capital: The Door Opens, but Not All the Way
The third lever is the most consequential for depth: foreign portfolio investors. In September 2026, SEBI permitted FPIs to participate in non-agricultural commodity derivatives, subject to safeguards around delivery obligations and exit from positions. The move followed an August consultation paper on FPI participation in exchange-traded commodity derivatives.
The logic is straightforward. Domestic commodity markets have deep pools of speculative capital but a thinner base of institutional hedging demand. Foreign participants — commodity trading houses, global macro funds, producers with natural short exposure — bring the other side of the book. They make markets deeper and, in theory, more informative.
But the door has a frame. FPIs remain barred from the newly launched BULLDEX index options because the underlying is not cash-settled, MCX management confirmed on its second-quarter earnings call. The distinction matters: a cash-settled contract lets a foreign investor take a financial view without ever touching a vault. A physically settled contract requires the operational capacity to receive or deliver metal. For a global fund, that is a business it is not in.
That boundary defines the shape of India's opening. It is not a free-for-all. It is a calibrated invitation to financial liquidity while the physical-delivery plumbing is still being reinforced. The same caution shows up in the delivery safeguards attached to the September permission: FPIs can participate, but the system is designed so they cannot be forced into taking physical commodity they cannot store or sell.
The Stress-Testing Overlay
The fourth lever, often overlooked, is risk management. SEBI's August 12, 2026 circular revised the inclusion of historical scenarios in stress testing for the commodity derivatives segment. Stress tests determine how much margin brokers must collect, and margins determine how much leverage traders can run. If the historical scenarios are too mild, margins are too thin and a shock forces liquidations. If they are too severe, margins choke the very liquidity the reforms are trying to create.
The timing is not accidental. A market that has doubled in a year is a market where leverage has grown faster than anyone can observe. Tightening the stress-testing framework while loosening position limits is the regulator's way of saying the two moves are not contradictory: more room to trade, but with more capital behind each trade.
A Cyclical Boom Meets a Structural Fix
The central question is whether the 2025-26 volume surge is the beginning of a durable transformation or a speculative cycle that will mean-revert. The evidence points to both, operating on different time horizons.
The volume itself is cyclical. Options notional up 140.3% in a year, concentrated in non-agricultural contracts on a single exchange, carries the signature of retail speculation chasing premium, not of end-users laying off risk. When the premium dries up or volatility compresses, that turnover can evaporate quickly. India's commodity market has seen this pattern before: a surge in activity after the Commodity Transaction Tax was introduced in 2013 was followed by years of thin participation as the tax made hedging expensive.
The reforms, by contrast, target structural bottlenecks. Settlement-price reliability, benchmark integrity, position-limit design, and foreign access are not sentiment-driven. They change the cost of participation for institutions, and institutions do not leave because a quarter's premium cycle turns. If the settlement framework earns trust, mutual funds and FPIs enter on multi-year mandates, not tactical trades.
The short version: the volume boom is a wave; the reforms are an attempt to deepen the harbor so the wave leaves something behind.
The Counter-Thesis: Liquidity Cannot Be Designed
The strongest argument against SEBI's approach is that liquidity is an emergent property, not a policy output. A regulator can change settlement mechanics and raise limits, but it cannot compel a hedger to show up. India's commodity derivatives market has been "the next big thing" for more than a decade, through the FMC era, the SEBI takeover, the transaction-tax debate, and repeated consultation papers. Skeptics would note that each reform cycle produces a burst of optimism and a modest net gain in depth.
There is also a sequencing risk. If settlement prices are still not trusted when position limits double, the result could be larger positions built on a benchmark that institutions still distrust — concentration without depth. And if FPI access remains confined to non-agricultural contracts, the segment that needs liquidity most — agriculture, where the real hedgers are — may remain thin regardless of how elegant the expiry auction becomes.
The falsifying signal is concrete: if, by the March 2027 quarter, agricultural commodities still account for less than 1% of turnover and mutual fund participation in commodity indices remains negligible despite the revised settlement framework, the reforms will have failed to convert volume into depth. Volume without breadth is the condition to watch, not the volume number itself.
Who Benefits, Who Is Exposed, and What to Watch
The beneficiaries of the reform package are identifiable. Exchanges gain from a broader participant base and more resilient turnover. MCX, which already captures 98.9% of activity and whose shares have roughly doubled over the past year, has the most to gain from institutional flows that stick. Brokers with institutional distribution and robust risk systems benefit more than pure retail-flow platforms. The exposed are the traders whose edge comes from settlement quirks and thin benchmarks: as price discovery improves, the arbitrage of opacity narrows.
The forward path splits by horizon. In the short term, the market will watch whether the October 3 comment deadline produces substantive changes to the CAS and settlement framework, and whether SEBI implements them before the next fiscal year. In the medium term, the test is whether FPI registrations translate into actual open interest in non-agricultural contracts, and whether mutual funds begin to use commodity indices as benchmarks rather than avoiding them. In the long term, the question is structural: does India build a commodity market where producers and consumers hedge as a matter of routine, or does it remain a venue where retail traders speculate on global prices?
Three scenarios frame the next twelve months. The base case is gradual deepening: settlement reforms land, FPI participation grows modestly, and turnover normalizes from its 140% surge to a still-elevated plateau. The upside case requires a policy accelerant — full cash-settlement access for FPIs, or a tax change that makes hedging cheaper for agri businesses — which would pull genuine hedgers into the system. The downside case is a repeat of the post-2013 pattern: volume retreats as the speculative cycle turns, and the reforms remain on the shelf because the institutions they were designed for never arrived.
The signal that decides among them is not another turnover print. It is the composition of that turnover: the share of agriculture, the presence of mutual funds and FPIs in open interest, and the bid-ask spread around expiry.
India is trying to build a commodity market that can price risk, not just trade it. The volume is finally here; the question is whether the plumbing can hold the weight.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
