NextFin News - For millions of Indians holding cryptocurrency, spending it on everyday life no longer requires converting it into rupees through a regulated exchange. It requires buying a gift card. Overseas crypto platforms are quietly enabling Indian users to swap stablecoins for domestic vouchers covering groceries, fuel and even gold, a workaround that exploits a gap in India's capital-control and payments architecture and is now drawing scrutiny from regulators and legal experts.
The mechanism is simple enough to be an open secret: a user sends USDT or USDC from a private wallet to a platform incorporated in Sweden, Germany or Singapore; that platform, in turn, buys closed-loop prepaid vouchers in bulk from Indian partners and returns a digital code that works at Indian stores. Because the vouchers cannot be used for third-party payments or cash withdrawal, they sit outside Reserve Bank of India regulation and carry no monetary limits. What began as a convenience for crypto holders has become a stress test for a regulatory framework that taxes virtual digital assets heavily but has yet to define how they may cross borders.
The Workaround, Step by Step
The chain has five links. First, an Indian user holds crypto, typically USDT or USDC, in a private e-wallet. Second, the user visits an overseas gift-card platform and selects an Indian brand — a supermarket chain, a fuel retailer, a jewellery store or an e-commerce marketplace. Third, the user pays the foreign entity in stablecoin. Fourth, the overseas platform either holds an inventory of digital card codes or generates them on demand through technology tie-ups with Indian voucher issuers and aggregators. Fifth, the code is delivered to the user, who spends it at the merchant.
Reporting on the trade has found that the offshore platforms buy gift vouchers in bulk from voucher-issuing and aggregator firms in India that act as partners. These are closed-loop prepaid instruments, issued by specific entities for purchase from their own brands and stores. Since they cannot be used for third-party payments or cash withdrawal, they have no monetary limits and fall outside RBI regulation.
The user base gives the workaround a large addressable market. India ranked first in the Chainalysis 2025 Global Crypto Adoption Index for the second consecutive year, topping all four sub-indices. Roughly 93 million to 119 million Indians hold crypto, about 6.55% of the population, with stablecoin usage concentrated in remittances and peer-to-peer transfers. In the 12 months ending June 2025, India received $338 billion in crypto inflows, the largest in Asia-Pacific, representing 4,800% growth over five years.
The tax regime makes the workaround more attractive. Gains on virtual digital assets are taxed at a flat 30% plus a 4% health and education cess, an effective rate of 31.2%. A 1% tax deducted at source applies to transfers above specified thresholds, and losses cannot be set off against gains. From April 1, 2026, the Finance Act 2025 expanded the VDA definition to explicitly include crypto-assets, and new reporting obligations require exchanges to submit user-level transaction statements to the income-tax department, with penalties of 200 rupees per day for late filing and 50,000 rupees for incorrect reporting. For a user who has already paid the tax, or is willing to forgo reporting, spending crypto directly through a voucher sidesteps moving rupees through a bank at all.
Why Gift Cards Are the Path of Least Resistance
The first-order explanation is regulatory arbitrage. India has not legalised crypto as a payment instrument. The RBI does not recognise it, and no domestic exchange is permitted to settle merchant payments in digital assets. But India has also not banned holding or transferring crypto; it taxes it. That creates an asymmetry: the asset is legal to own but has few sanctioned ways to be spent.
Gift cards exploit the one instrument that is legal, ubiquitous and lightly regulated. Closed-loop prepaid vouchers have existed for years as corporate gifting and incentive tools. Because they are redeemable only at the issuing merchant and cannot be cashed out, regulators treat them as lower risk than open-loop prepaid payment instruments, which require RBI authorisation and carry strict load limits. The result is a category of proxy money that carries purchasing power inside India without crossing the RBI's perimeter.
The cross-border leg is where the arbitrage sharpens. When an Indian pays a Swedish or Singaporean platform in stablecoin, no Indian bank is involved in the outbound leg. The foreign platform then settles with its Indian voucher partner in rupees through normal channels. To the Indian banking system, the transaction looks like a routine domestic business-to-business voucher purchase, not a cross-border crypto payment.
The Mechanism That Matters: Settlement Invisibility
This is the transmission channel worth watching. The economic result, an Indian consumer funding domestic consumption with crypto, is identical to what would happen if the user sold USDT on an exchange, received rupees in a bank account and swiped a debit card. But the settlement trail is different. In the exchange route, the bank sees an inbound rupee credit from a Financial Intelligence Unit-registered virtual asset service provider, and the 1% TDS is deducted. In the gift-card route, the bank sees a routine merchant settlement from a voucher aggregator.
India has clear rules governing cross-border payments, including the permitted manner of payment and circumstances in which a third party may settle an obligation. The concern is crypto being used to achieve the same economic result outside banking system and its attendant checks. While AML and tax requirements apply to VDAs, there's need for express clarity under forex framework on cross-border crypto transfers, particularly when converted into vouchers or other instruments providing purchasing power in India.
Moin Ladha, a partner at Khaitan & Co, framed the concern that way. The loophole is not that the activity is untaxed; income tax and anti-money-laundering rules still apply to VDAs in principle. The loophole is that enforcement depends on visibility, and visibility is weakest at the seam between a foreign crypto platform and a domestic voucher partner.
Cyclical or Structural: This Is Structural, With a Cyclical Overlay
The right read is that this is a structural leak, not a cyclical blip. Three pieces of evidence support that.
First, the driver is a rule, not a price. The gift-card route exists because of India's regulatory architecture: crypto taxed but not legalised as payment, closed-loop vouchers lightly regulated, cross-border settlement rules written before stablecoins existed. Rule-based behaviour does not mean-revert when prices move.
Second, the infrastructure is durable. The overseas platforms have built catalogues and Indian voucher partnerships that do not disappear in a bear market. Bitrefill, founded in Stockholm in 2015, lists more than 3,000 brands worldwide and added more than 200 gift cards for India; CryptoRefills advertises more than 6,600 products across 180 countries. Their revenue model scales with Indian crypto holdings regardless of whether Bitcoin is at a high or a low.
Third, the user base is entrenched. With up to 119 million Indians holding crypto and India ranked first globally in grassroots adoption for two consecutive years, the behaviour has a large, sticky base.
The cyclical overlay is real but secondary. In bull markets, more Indians accumulate crypto and the incentive to spend it rises. In bear markets, users who are underwater have less reason to realise gains and pay the 30% tax, which could push more of them toward direct spending rather than conversion. Either way, the gift-card channel grows.
The Second-Order Implication: Capital Controls, Not Just Payments
The market's first-order read is that this is a payments story: crypto finally becoming usable for daily life. The second-order read is that it is a capital-account story. India maintains capital controls through the banking system. Every cross-border payment is supposed to flow through authorised dealers, with purpose codes, documentation and limits. The gift-card route lets purchasing power move into India without a corresponding authorised-dealer transaction.
At current scale this is manageable. Global crypto-card spending reached an annualised $18 billion in late 2025, according to research from Artemis, nearly matching peer-to-peer stablecoin transfers at $19 billion. Monthly volume compounded at 106% annually, from roughly $100 million in early 2023 to more than $1.5 billion by late 2025. India is already an outlier in stablecoin composition: 47.4% of its stablecoin volume is USDC versus USDT, one of only two markets worldwide where USDC approaches parity with USDT, alongside Argentina at 46.6%. That USDC skew matters because USDC is issued by a regulated US entity subject to sanctions screening, which means the foreign leg of these transactions is more traceable than a pure-USDT flow, a fact that cuts both ways for regulators.
If the channel compounds at the global rate, the question shifts from whether this is a loophole to how much value is moving outside the authorised-dealer perimeter, and for what purpose. Grocery and fuel vouchers are one thing; high-value gold vouchers are another. Gold is India's traditional capital-flight and wedding-hedge asset, and a frictionless crypto-to-gold pipeline would concern the RBI far more than a 2,000-rupee supermarket voucher.
The Counter-Thesis: Too Small and Too Leaky to Matter
The strongest argument against alarm is scale and leakage. Gift cards are a fraction of a fraction of India's retail payments, which are dominated by the Unified Payments Interface. UPI processed 241.6 billion transactions worth 314 lakh crore rupees in the 2025-26 financial year, with a record monthly volume of 22.64 crore transactions in March 2026, according to the National Payments Corporation of India. For most Indians, paying in rupees via UPI is easier than buying crypto, sending it abroad and redeeming a code. The gift-card route is a niche behaviour for the crypto-owning minority, and a clumsy one at that: users absorb conversion spreads, platform fees and the risk that a code fails at the point of sale.
There is also a leakage problem for anyone trying to use this channel for serious value movement. Closed-loop vouchers cannot be cashed out or used for third-party payments, which caps their fungibility. A payment-industry official captured the trade-off: "We can make controls as tight as Fort Knox, but that would reduce ease and spontaneity of gifting. The industry is constantly trying to balance fraud prevention with ease of use." Tightening voucher rules would damage a legitimate gifting and corporate-incentives industry worth far more than the crypto-arbitrage slice.
This counter-thesis is strongest on current scale but weakest on trajectory. The arbitrage does not need to be large today to be structurally important; it needs to be growing and hard to close without collateral damage. Both conditions hold.
What Would Prove the Structural View Wrong
The falsifying signal is specific. If the share of Indian stablecoin volume routed through regulated, FIU-registered exchanges continues to rise while voucher-redemption growth stalls, or if regulators issue express forex clarity that brings cross-border crypto-to-voucher conversions inside the authorised-dealer perimeter without killing the voucher market, then the leak is being closed through supervision rather than becoming a durable shadow channel. Conversely, if India's USDC share keeps rising while exchange-registered inflows flatten, the gift-card route is absorbing flow that would otherwise be visible.
Who Benefits, Who Is Exposed, and What to Watch
Beneficiaries, in order: the overseas gift-card platforms, which monetise a regulatory gap without taking Indian licensing risk; Indian voucher issuers and aggregators, which gain a new wholesale buyer; and Indian crypto holders, who gain a spending rail that does not require banking-system intermediation. The exposed parties are the RBI and the income-tax department, both of which lose visibility, the first over cross-border settlement and the second over realisation events, and domestic exchanges, which lose the flow that would otherwise pass through their order books and their TDS deduction.
What to watch: regulatory language, with any express clarification under the forex framework on cross-border crypto transfers converted into vouchers being the first sign the gap is being closed; voucher policy, where changes to closed-loop prepaid instrument limits or KYC thresholds would directly target the mechanism; exchange data, where the gap between on-chain Indian stablecoin volume and FIU-registered exchange inflows is the tell; and gold, where jewellery vouchers becoming a prominent use case would draw faster regulatory attention than groceries and fuel.
Base case: regulators issue clarificatory guidance over the next 12 to 18 months, bringing the cross-border leg under reporting obligations while leaving closed-loop vouchers intact. The channel survives but becomes visible. Upside case for the platforms: clarity is slow and crypto adoption keeps compounding; gift-card redemptions become a standard feature of Indian crypto life, and platforms add rupee-denominated catalogues and local partnerships. Downside case: a high-profile misuse case involving money laundering or large-scale gold conversion triggers a crackdown on voucher aggregators' crypto-facing business, forcing platforms to geo-block Indian brands.
India's crypto policy has produced a predictable outcome: tax an asset heavily, refuse to legalise it as money, and users will invent ways to spend it that look like everything except money. The gift-card workaround is not a flaw in the voucher system. It is the market's answer to a regulatory contradiction, and until that contradiction is resolved, the codes will keep working.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
