NextFin News - The global energy market is significantly underestimating the structural damage to liquefied natural gas (LNG) supply chains caused by the ongoing conflict involving Iran, according to Meg O’Neill, Chief Executive Officer of Woodside Energy. Speaking at an industry forum on Tuesday, O’Neill warned that the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz has removed nearly 20% of global LNG capacity from the market, a deficit that cannot be easily bridged by surging U.S. exports or Australian production. The Northeast Asian spot LNG price (JKM) for June delivery recently hovered in the high-$16 per million British thermal units (MBtu) range, reflecting a market that remains on edge six weeks after the escalation began.
O’Neill, who has led Australia’s largest dedicated gas producer since 2021, is widely regarded as one of the industry’s most vocal LNG bulls. Under her leadership, Woodside has aggressively expanded its global footprint, including the $28 billion merger with BHP’s petroleum arm and recent pivots toward U.S. Gulf Coast projects. Her long-standing position is that natural gas will remain a "core" pillar of the global energy transition for decades, a view that often places her at odds with climate-focused institutional investors who favor a faster shift toward renewables. Consequently, her warnings of a prolonged supply crunch align with Woodside’s strategic interest in justifying long-term, capital-intensive gas infrastructure.
The current crisis centers on the paralysis of Qatari exports. According to data from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, Qatar, the UAE, and Oman combined to export approximately 128 billion cubic meters of LNG in 2025, with China, Japan, and South Korea being the primary destinations. With Iranian forces obstructing the Strait of Hormuz, these volumes are effectively trapped. While U.S. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright recently noted that American exporters are moving to fill the void, the physical reality of liquefaction capacity means the world is facing a net deficit that could persist through the 2026-2027 winter heating season.
However, O’Neill’s dire outlook is not a universal consensus. Some market analysts suggest that the "war premium" currently baked into prices may be overstated if demand destruction accelerates in price-sensitive Asian markets. In India and Pakistan—two nations heavily reliant on Qatari spot cargoes—imports have already begun to scale back as prices crossed the $15/MBtu threshold. Furthermore, European gas storage levels remain at seasonally high levels, providing a temporary buffer that has kept the Dutch TTF benchmark from reaching the record peaks seen during the 2022 energy crisis. This suggests that while the supply shock is real, the "underestimation" O’Neill cites may actually be a rational market adjustment to softening global demand.
The sustainability of the current price rally depends heavily on the duration of the maritime blockade. If the conflict remains localized and the Strait remains contested for months rather than weeks, the industry faces a fundamental repricing of energy security. For Woodside and its American peers, this environment provides a powerful narrative to accelerate final investment decisions on new projects. Yet, for the global economy, the risk remains that a prolonged "Iran discount" on supply will force a permanent shift in industrial energy consumption, potentially undermining the very long-term demand O’Neill’s strategy relies upon.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
