NextFin News - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has ordered a 48-hour surge in strategic airstrikes against Iranian military infrastructure, a move senior officials describe as a desperate race to dismantle Tehran’s weapons industry before U.S. President Trump can impose a ceasefire. The directive, issued Tuesday, follows the delivery of a 15-point American peace proposal to Tehran, signaling a widening strategic rift between the two allies as the White House pivots toward a negotiated exit from the month-long conflict.
The intensity of the current bombardment reflects a "now or never" calculus in Jerusalem. According to the New York Times, Netanyahu’s cabinet received a copy of the U.S. plan earlier this week, prompting an immediate acceleration of sorties targeting the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) command centers and missile production facilities. The deadline is set for Thursday, a window Israeli planners believe represents the final moments of operational freedom before U.S. President Trump potentially announces a formal diplomatic breakthrough. While the White House has neither confirmed nor denied the existence of the 15-point document, the mere prospect of a deal has forced Israel to front-load its remaining military objectives.
The friction is rooted in fundamentally different definitions of victory. For U.S. President Trump, the war—which began with a massive joint strike on February 28 that killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei—has already achieved its primary goal of decapitating the Iranian leadership and establishing "maximum leverage." The U.S. administration is now eyeing a grand bargain that includes the permanent dismantling of Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for regional stability. However, Netanyahu remains haunted by the "containment" failures of October 7. His government argues that any deal leaving Iran’s industrial military base intact is merely a countdown to the next escalation.
On the ground, the cost of this diplomatic-military friction is being measured in high-explosive tonnage. Overnight, Israel carried out dozens of strikes across Iran, focusing on the Intelligence Ministry and weapons depots. Iran retaliated with missile barrages targeting Tel Aviv and Dimona, where a direct hit on a residential area narrowly avoided mass casualties. The exchange underscores a paradox: as the U.S. moves closer to a deal, the violence on the ground is actually intensifying as both sides attempt to improve their bargaining positions or, in Israel’s case, destroy the very assets that would be subject to future monitoring.
The regional implications are already shifting. While U.S. President Trump has deployed thousands of additional Marines to the Middle East, the deployment is increasingly viewed as a "security blanket" for a withdrawal rather than a precursor to a ground invasion. This has left Israel treading a fine line. Defense Minister Israel Katz announced Tuesday that Israeli forces would establish a permanent security zone in southern Lebanon, south of the Litani River, regardless of any U.S.-Iran deal. This suggests that even if the "big war" with Tehran pauses, the "war between wars" against Iranian proxies like Hezbollah will continue unabated.
Tehran’s response to the 15-point plan remains a mixture of defiance and tactical concession. While state media initially dismissed the proposal as the U.S. "negotiating with itself," the regime has notably agreed to allow "non-hostile" oil vessels to transit the Strait of Hormuz. This move, likely aimed at cooling global oil prices that have spiked above $100 a barrel, serves as a signal to Washington that a deal is possible—provided the U.S. can restrain its junior partner in Jerusalem. For Netanyahu, the coming 24 hours represent a high-stakes gamble: he must inflict enough damage to neutralize Iran for a generation, without alienating the U.S. President whose support remains his only ultimate guarantee of security.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
