NextFin News - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government has formally proposed a joint military operation to U.S. President Trump aimed at striking Iran’s critical energy infrastructure, a move intended to trigger a financial collapse and accelerate regime change in Tehran. According to a report by Israel’s Channel 12 on Monday, Israeli officials believe a "window of opportunity" has opened to topple the Islamic Republic by dismantling the economic pillars that sustain its leadership. The proposal marks a significant escalation in the regional strategy, shifting the focus from containing Iran’s nuclear ambitions to actively seeking the dissolution of its government through targeted economic devastation.
The market reaction to the report was immediate and sharp. WTI crude oil surged $3.82 to $103.46 per barrel, hitting its highest levels of the day as traders priced in the risk of a massive disruption to global energy supplies. On Wall Street, the S&P 500 erased a 50-point premarket gain to trade in negative territory, reflecting deep-seated anxiety over a potential widening of the conflict. The proposal comes at a delicate moment, as U.S. President Trump has recently extended an ultimatum to Tehran until April 6, while simultaneously hinting at "serious discussions" with what he described as a "more reasonable regime" to end the ongoing hostilities.
The Channel 12 report, which has been the primary driver of today’s market volatility, originates from a news outlet known for its deep ties to the Israeli security establishment. While Channel 12 often serves as a conduit for official government signaling, its reporting on high-level diplomatic maneuvers is sometimes used as a tool for leverage in negotiations. This specific proposal for a joint strike on energy facilities has not yet been confirmed by the White House or the U.S. State Department, and it currently represents a specific Israeli strategic preference rather than a settled bilateral policy. Analysts note that while U.S. President Trump has previously threatened to "obliterate" Iranian energy sources in retaliation for attacks, he has also shown a preference for a "dream deal" that would avoid a protracted regional war.
The strategic logic behind the Israeli proposal rests on the assumption that Iran’s economy is already at a breaking point. By targeting oil refineries and export terminals, Israel argues that the resulting hyperinflation and fiscal paralysis would leave the Iranian leadership unable to pay its security forces or suppress domestic unrest. However, this "regime change through energy strikes" theory is viewed with skepticism by many veteran Middle East observers. Critics argue that such an attack could instead galvanize nationalist sentiment in Iran and provoke a devastating counter-response against energy infrastructure across the Persian Gulf, potentially dragging the global economy into a recession.
The geopolitical stakes are further complicated by the internal dynamics in Tehran. Reports from Haaretz suggest that while the Iranian leadership is not eager to continue the war, they are also not rushing to meet the 15 conditions laid out by the Trump administration for a ceasefire. U.S. Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio are reportedly leading the diplomatic efforts, seeking a figure within the Iranian hierarchy who can deliver a sustainable peace. The Israeli proposal for a strike on energy facilities may be intended to force Tehran’s hand before the April 6 deadline, or to ensure that any eventual deal is struck from a position of absolute Iranian weakness.
For global markets, the immediate concern is the "tit-for-tat" potential of such an escalation. If the U.S. and Israel were to move forward with strikes on Iranian oil, Tehran has repeatedly threatened to target the Strait of Hormuz and neighboring oil fields. This scenario would likely push crude prices well above the $120 mark, further complicating the inflation outlook for the Federal Reserve. As the April 6 deadline approaches, the tension between Israel’s push for a decisive blow and the Trump administration’s search for a diplomatic "win" remains the central pivot for global risk assets.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
