NextFin News - Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) has recommended that Swatch Group AG investors support a board candidate proposed by activist investor Steven Wood, marking a significant escalation in the governance battle at the world’s largest watchmaker. The proxy advisor’s endorsement, issued ahead of the May annual general meeting, challenges the long-standing control of the Hayek family and signals growing institutional dissatisfaction with the company’s capital allocation and share price performance.
Wood, the founder of GreenWood Investors, has spent the past two years campaigning for a seat on the board to represent minority shareholders. According to Bloomberg, ISS argued that Wood’s presence would provide much-needed independent oversight and help address the "persistent valuation discount" at which Swatch trades compared to its luxury peers. Wood is known for a concentrated, value-oriented investment style and has historically taken a critical stance toward family-controlled conglomerates that he believes prioritize legacy over shareholder returns. While his campaign has gained momentum, his views are often seen as more aggressive than the broader sell-side consensus, which remains cautious about the feasibility of forcing change upon the Hayek family.
The Hayek family maintains a firm grip on the Swiss manufacturer through a dual-class share structure, holding roughly 43% of the voting rights despite owning a smaller fraction of the total equity. This structure has allowed CEO Nick Hayek and Chairwoman Nayla Hayek to rebuff previous activist overtures. The company has officially urged shareholders to reject Wood’s candidacy, citing his U.S. citizenship and lack of Swiss residency as "important reasons" for disqualification. Swatch has long maintained that its board must be composed of individuals who understand the specific cultural and industrial nuances of the Swiss watchmaking heartland.
The tension comes as Swatch faces a cooling global market for luxury timepieces. While the "MoonSwatch" collaboration between Omega and Swatch provided a temporary boost to sales and brand visibility, the group’s high-end brands like Breguet and Blancpain have struggled to keep pace with the growth seen at rivals such as Richemont or LVMH. Activists argue that the company’s massive cash pile—often exceeding 2 billion Swiss francs—should be returned to shareholders through buybacks or higher dividends rather than sitting idle on the balance sheet.
However, some analysts remain skeptical that an activist victory is even possible given the voting math. Zuercher Kantonalbank has previously noted that without the support of the Hayek family, any board proposal is essentially "dead on arrival." This perspective suggests that the ISS recommendation may serve more as a symbolic protest than a catalyst for immediate structural change. The outcome of the May vote will ultimately serve as a barometer for how much pressure the broader investment community is willing to exert on one of Switzerland’s most insular corporate dynasties.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
