NextFin News - On Thursday, February 12, 2026, Italy’s financial police, the Guardia di Finanza, executed a series of high-profile searches at Amazon’s Italian headquarters in Milan. According to Reuters, the operation is part of a fresh investigation into alleged tax evasion by the U.S. technology giant. The probe specifically targets the period between 2019 and 2024, investigating whether Amazon maintained an undisclosed permanent establishment in the country—a legal status that would have required the company to report and pay taxes on a significantly larger portion of its Italian-generated revenue. In addition to the corporate offices, authorities searched the homes of seven Amazon managers and the offices of the auditing firm KPMG, which provides advisory services to the retailer.
The core of the legal dispute rests on the concept of a "permanent establishment" (PE). Under international tax law, if a company has a fixed place of business through which its activities are wholly or partly carried out, it is liable for local corporate taxes. Italian prosecutors are examining whether Amazon’s operational infrastructure in Italy—ranging from logistics hubs to management offices—functioned as a de facto permanent base that was not properly declared for tax purposes. This is not the first time Amazon has faced such scrutiny; in late 2025, the company was also linked to investigations regarding customs fraud and VAT compliance. However, this new probe represents a more direct challenge to Amazon’s corporate structure and its relationship with tax advisors like KPMG.
From a financial analysis perspective, this investigation highlights the growing friction between the "digital-first" business models of Big Tech and the geographically bound tax codes of European nations. For years, multinational corporations have utilized transfer pricing and intellectual property licensing to shift profits to low-tax jurisdictions. However, the Italian authorities are increasingly utilizing "substance over form" arguments. By searching the homes of managers and the offices of their auditors, the Guardia di Finanza is signaling that it intends to look past contractual arrangements to the actual day-to-day decision-making processes that occurred on Italian soil. If the probe proves that strategic management was conducted within Italy, the fiscal liabilities for Amazon could reach hundreds of millions of euros in back taxes and penalties.
The involvement of KPMG is particularly noteworthy. It suggests that regulators are no longer satisfied with penalizing the corporations alone but are now scrutinizing the enablers of complex tax structures. This follows a broader European trend where auditing firms are held to higher standards of accountability regarding the tax transparency of their multinational clients. For Amazon, the timing is precarious. As U.S. President Trump continues to advocate for a "U.S. First" economic policy, including potential retaliatory tariffs or tax adjustments, the aggressive stance of European tax authorities could lead to a fragmented regulatory environment that complicates global earnings reporting.
Looking ahead, this case is likely to serve as a bellwether for how European Union member states will enforce the OECD’s Pillar Two global minimum tax framework. While the global minimum tax aims to create a floor of 15%, local authorities like those in Italy are clearly still focused on the "nexus" of where value is created. We expect to see an increase in similar "permanent establishment" challenges across the EU, particularly in the e-commerce and cloud computing sectors. For investors, the risk is not merely the immediate fine, but the potential for a forced restructuring of Amazon’s European operations, which could permanently increase its effective tax rate and compress margins in one of its most vital international markets.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
