NextFin News - Monte dei Paschi di Siena, the world's oldest bank and Italy's former bailout case, approved a plan on Thursday to buy two rivals - Banco BPM and Banca Generali - in a single counter-strike against Italy's biggest lender, Intesa Sanpaolo, which launched a €30.6 billion unsolicited takeover bid for MPS in June. The board voted 9-4, with four abstentions, after roughly seven hours of deliberation, to launch two public exchange offers paid entirely in MPS shares, a move that would flip the 2017 rescue story on its head: the bank that once needed the state is now trying to become the acquirer of last resort.
The Weekend That Rewrote the Italian Banking Map
Over one weekend in early June 2026, Italy's banking system was redrawn twice. On Sunday, June 7, Banco BPM's board approved opening merger-of-equals talks with Monte dei Paschi di Siena, a combination that would have created Italy's No. 2 bank. On Monday, June 8, Intesa Sanpaolo responded with a voluntary public tender and exchange offer for the entire MPS group, valuing the company at €30.6 billion and offering 1.6 newly issued Intesa shares for every MPS share plus €1 in cash - a premium of 12.5% to the prior Friday's close and 17.4% to the three-month average price. The offer is conditional on Intesa acquiring at least 66.67% of MPS's share capital, a threshold it can waive at its own discretion, plus regulatory approvals.
The market's first read was unambiguous: MPS shares jumped 13% on the Monday the bid broke, while Intesa slipped 1.4%. Over the preceding three months MPS had already gained 21%, compared with 6.7% for Intesa - the market had been pricing a move long before the offer landed. The message was that MPS shareholders saw the bid as a floor, not a ceiling, and that the target had options.
Those options crystallized on Thursday, August 20, when the MPS board approved CEO Luigi Lovaglio's two-pronged defense. The plan is a public exchange offer for Banco BPM, worth roughly €25 billion, and a separate offer for Banca Generali, valued at nearly €8 billion. Together they point to a combined group worth close to €70 billion - still well short of Intesa's €121 billion market value, but large enough to argue that MPS no longer needs a rescuer.
What makes the reversal striking is the timeline. Less than two years earlier, in November 2024, the Italian Treasury sold a 15% stake in MPS for €1.1 billion, cutting its holding to 11.7% and finally exiting the control position it had taken in the 2017 bailout, which cost the state more than €5 billion. In January 2025, the same bank launched a €13.3 billion share-exchange offer for Mediobanca. By September 2025 it held 62.29% of the merchant bank, and on March 10, 2026, the two boards approved a merger by incorporation at an exchange ratio of 2.450 MPS shares for each Mediobanca share.
That acquisition did more than add an investment-banking arm. Through Mediobanca, MPS acquired a 13% stake in Generali, Italy's largest insurer - a holding worth about €8.5 billion at current market prices. It is the asset that turned MPS from a retail lender into a financial conglomerate, and the prize that explains why Intesa wants it. Under Intesa's plan, MPS shareholders would end up holding 21.7% of the combined Intesa group.
MPS has not accepted the bid as fair. The board said the 12.5% premium "appears lower than the average level of premia observed in comparable voluntary public tender and/or exchange offers in the Italian banking sector, equal to approximately 30%," and expressed doubts that the €2.9 billion in annual pre-tax synergies Intesa projected "appear high relative to the economic scale" of the MPS assets in the deal. That is the opening position in a negotiation, not a final no - and it tells Lovaglio exactly how much room he has to build an alternative.
Why the Target Fights Back: Integrity, Scale, and the Generali Key
The core question is not whether MPS can afford to bid - the offers are paid in shares, not cash - but whether the counter-bid creates more value than Intesa's paper-and-cash package. Lovaglio's argument rests on three pillars: integrity, scale, and optionality.
On integrity, he was explicit in his analyst call on August 20:
"MPS is a strategic asset for the Italian economy. It is an important economic infrastructure for the country and has a systemic value that derives from the integrity of the bank itself. If you split a power plant in two, both parts might still be able to survive, but you risk a loss of power and a reduction in the ability to deliver energy where it's needed. It works the same way for banks."
That was Luigi Lovaglio, the chief executive who took over MPS in 2022 after the state rescue, speaking to analysts after the board meeting. The "split" he is referring to is the antitrust remedy Intesa has already negotiated. To clear its 2020 acquisition of UBI Banca, Intesa agreed to sell a self-standing banking entity to Unipol Assicurazioni for cash - 635 branches free from commercial partnerships, around 2 million customers, and roughly €42 billion in loans against €55 billion in deposits. The sale is scheduled for the second half of 2027, and the divested business will carry the Monte dei Paschi brand into Unipol-controlled BPER Banca. The combined Intesa-MPS group would serve more than 27 million clients and hold around €2 trillion in customer financial resources. Intesa projects the merged entity's net income would exceed €16 billion by 2029, compared with €11.5 billion in its standalone business plan, and has scheduled an extraordinary shareholders' meeting for September 10 to vote on a €5.7 billion capital increase to back the deal.
On scale, the Lovaglio plan is a bet that three mid-sized players are worth more together than one large one carved up. MPS at €36 billion in market value, plus Banco BPM at €25 billion and Banca Generali at €8 billion, creates a group with a retail bank, a merchant bank, and a wealth manager under one roof - a structure that mirrors what UniCredit spent years trying to assemble through its own failed bid for Banco BPM.
On optionality, the share-swap structure lets MPS defer the cash question. It has reserves it can draw on to bolster shareholder returns and counter the cash component Intesa is offering. But it also inherits two integrations at once: Mediobanca, still being absorbed, and two new acquisitions. The complexity is the first thing critics point to.
The Regulatory Labyrinth: Why This Could Take a Year
Every move in this saga runs through the same regulatory gauntlet: European Central Bank approval, which can take up to three months; Banca d'Italia sign-off; Consob approval of the offer document; IVASS clearance where insurance stakes are involved; an AGCM antitrust review; and potential Golden Power intervention by the government. The full process typically runs six to twelve months from announcement to completion.
The mandatory bid threshold in Italy is currently 25% of voting shares. That rule is why Crédit Agricole's position in Banco BPM matters: the French bank held 22.9% at the end of the first quarter and, through market purchases and a derivative instrument, raised its stake to 29.3% by early July, notifying authorities that it had crossed the threshold. It has ruled out a full takeover and is positioning itself as a long-term partner - but with nearly 30% of BPM, it holds effective veto power over any Lovaglio offer for the bank.
There is also the passivity rule: under Italian takeover law, once Intesa's bid is formal, MPS cannot agree to a deal with Banco BPM without prior shareholder approval. That freezes the friendly merger path for the duration of the offer period and forces Lovaglio to run his own offers to the BPM and Generali shareholder bases - two more votes, two more timelines, two more chances for the plan to stall.
The precedent for political friction is recent. In November 2024, UniCredit launched a share-exchange offer worth over €10 billion for Banco BPM; in July 2025 it dropped the proposal on the cusp of its natural expiry, citing the opacity of conditions imposed by the Rome administration through Golden Power screening - the first time the tool had been used against a merger between two Italian banks. UniCredit has since redirected its consolidation drive across the Alps, pursuing Germany's Commerzbank and crossing the 30% ownership threshold there.
Cyclical or Structural: What the Italian Banking Wave Really Is
The easy read of this episode is that it is cyclical - a burst of deal activity driven by valuations, interest margins, and a government eager to finish privatizing the banks it rescued. On that view, once the wave passes, the system settles back into a familiar shape: a handful of national champions and a long tail of regional lenders.
The evidence points the other way. This is a structural reshaping of Italian finance, and three things make it durable.
First, the ownership map has changed permanently. The state's retreat - its MPS stake fell from around 64% in 2017 to 11.7% by late 2024 - removed the political veto that blocked consolidation for a decade. Private investors, including Francesco Gaetano Caltagirone and the Del Vecchio family's Delfin holding, now hold meaningful blocks and have incentives to push for combinations rather than protect the status quo.
Second, the Mediobanca acquisition changed what MPS is. A retail bank with a merchant bank and a 13% insurer stake is not the same business as a retail bank. The Generali holding alone is worth €8.5 billion - nearly a quarter of MPS's €36 billion market value - which means MPS is now part insurance play, part corporate-finance platform. That structure does not reverse on its own.
Third, the European dimension has arrived. As Stefano Caselli, dean of the SDA Bocconi School of Management, put it:
"What's happening is not just an Italian story – Italy has become an important case study for the EU to test how M&A can evolve in the European banking sector."
UniCredit's bid for Commerzbank and Crédit Agricole's stake-building in Banco BPM show that Italian banks are now operating in a cross-border arena where scale is the price of entry.
The counter-argument is that the Lovaglio plan is overreach. An Italian business daily noted on August 20 that the market reacted coolly to the two-pronged move, and the skepticism is well founded: MPS would be managing the completion of the Mediobanca integration, a merger with Banco BPM, and a bid for Banca Generali simultaneously. Execution risk is real, and the passivity rule means the friendly BPM path is frozen while Intesa's offer is live. Filippo Maria Alloatti, head of financials for credit at Federated Hermes, had already flagged the pattern months earlier:
"Of late we have seen Banca BPER successful taking over Banca Sondrio, and Illimity Bank acquired by Banca Ifis. Meanwhile Monte dei Paschi is resolutely marching on Mediobanca, and Banco BPM's independence might be short-lived, with Credit Agricole launching towards a 20% stake. A merger between Credit Agricole Italy and Banco BPM seems likely in the medium-term."
But even if Lovaglio's specific plan fails, the structural force behind it does not disappear. The state is no longer the blocking shareholder. The valuations still reward combination. And the Generali stake ensures that MPS will remain a contested asset rather than a passive target. The question is not whether consolidation continues; it is which configuration wins.
What to Watch Next
Three signals will determine which path the saga takes. First, the September 10 shareholder vote at Intesa on the €5.7 billion capital increase - if it fails or is delayed, the bid loses momentum. Second, the shareholder responses to MPS's exchange offers for Banco BPM and Banca Generali; Crédit Agricole's roughly 29% block in BPM gives it effective veto power over that leg. Third, the ECB and AGCM timelines - any Golden Power intervention would extend the process well beyond the December 2026 target for Intesa's deal, with the Unipol divestiture itself scheduled only for the second half of 2027.
The base case is a prolonged contest: Intesa's bid and Lovaglio's counter-bids run in parallel through late 2026, with regulatory clearance pushing completion into 2027. The upside case for MPS shareholders is that competing offers bid the price higher, either from Intesa raising its premium above the current 12.5% or from a revised consortium structure. The downside case is that complexity wins: the twin offers stall, the passivity rule holds, and Intesa closes its deal with the branch divestiture intact.
Short term, the news flow favors volatility - every board meeting, every regulatory filing, every leak moves the shares. Medium term, the fundamentals favor the larger configuration: a combined MPS-BPM-Generali group or an Intesa-MPS giant both earn more than the sum of their parts. Long term, the structural shift is already done: Italy's banking system will exit this cycle with fewer, larger, more complex groups, and the state's role as permanent guardian of the weakest lender is over.
The real story is not that Italy's oldest bank is being bought. It is that the bank which once symbolized the country's financial fragility has become the acquirer - and that the fragility has moved to whoever underestimates it.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
