NextFin News - A high-stakes digital error has stripped away the political veneer of the New South Wales Liberal Party, exposing a clandestine push to dismantle the state’s toughest gun reforms in a generation. On Monday, Goulburn MP Wendy Tuckerman inadvertently broadcast the opposition’s internal strategy to dozens of electorate offices, calling for a reversal of the firearms buyback and a fundamental shift in the party’s stance on the Terrorism and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025. The blunder comes just three months after the Bondi massacre, an event that claimed 15 lives and catalyzed a rare moment of legislative urgency in Sydney.
The email, intended for Anthony Roberts, the opposition’s police spokesman, was explicit in its directive. Tuckerman urged Roberts to prepare a submission for the shadow cabinet that would support Coalition legislation to "reverse the position and fix this mess." This "mess" refers to the omnibus security laws passed on Christmas Eve 2025, which capped individual gun ownership at four weapons and primary producer ownership at ten. While the Liberals officially supported the bill in December to avoid being seen as soft on public safety following the Bondi tragedy, the leaked correspondence reveals a party leadership privately chafing under the new restrictions.
The timing of this revelation is politically toxic. The Minns government’s reforms were backed by a $300 million buyback scheme and were designed to curb a firearm population that had swelled to 1.1 million in New South Wales. Public sentiment remains overwhelmingly in favor of the crackdown; polling conducted shortly after the Bondi attack indicated that 75% of Australians wanted stricter gun laws. By signaling a desire to "stop the buyback," the Liberals risk a direct confrontation with a grieving electorate that still views the December reforms as a necessary response to mass violence.
However, the internal pressure within the Liberal Party is not merely ideological; it is existential. Recent polling shows the Liberal primary vote has slumped to its lowest level since the 2023 election, while One Nation has surged to 23%, breathing down the neck of the Coalition. One Nation’s rise, fueled by rural discontent over the gun caps, has left the Liberals trapped between the urban voters who demand safety and a conservative base that views the ownership limits as "knee-jerk" and administratively unenforceable. The Nationals, the Liberals' junior coalition partner, already broke ranks in December to oppose the caps, citing the impact on farmers.
The fallout from Tuckerman’s email suggests the Liberals are preparing to pivot toward the Nationals' position, even if it means re-opening a debate the public thought was settled. Opposition Leader Kellie Sloane has already begun laying the groundwork for this retreat, criticizing the "rushed" nature of the Christmas Eve legislation. While a spokesperson for Sloane attempted to dismiss Tuckerman’s email as the "opinion of one backbencher," the specific instruction to draft shadow cabinet submissions suggests a coordinated policy shift rather than a rogue outburst.
The administrative burden of the new firearms registry has become the primary wedge issue for the opposition. Critics argue that the registry is a "mess" that diverts police resources away from frontline duties to manage paperwork for law-abiding citizens. This narrative allows the Liberals to frame their opposition not as a rejection of safety, but as a pursuit of bureaucratic efficiency. Yet, for a public still haunted by the images of the Bondi shooting, the distinction between administrative reform and the wholesale reversal of ownership caps may prove too fine a line to walk. The Liberal Party now finds itself in the unenviable position of having its private doubts made public, just as the political cost of those doubts has reached its peak.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
