NextFin

Longfor Group Reports 90% Profit Plunge as Core Business Swings to RMB 1.7 Billion Loss

Summarized by NextFin AI
  • Longfor Group Holdings reported a dramatic 90.2% drop in annual net profit for 2025, falling to RMB 1.022 billion from RMB 10.4 billion in 2024, indicating severe challenges in the property sector.
  • The company's core results showed a net loss of RMB 1.7 billion, contrasting sharply with the RMB 6.97 billion profit in 2024, highlighting a fundamental shift in its business model.
  • Despite the losses, all business segments generated positive operating cash flow, a critical metric for assessing stability in the Chinese credit market.
  • Analysts from Morgan Stanley and UBS maintain cautious ratings, with potential annual losses in the property sector estimated between RMB 7 billion to RMB 7.5 billion for 2025-2026, impacting Longfor's net asset value.

NextFin News - Longfor Group Holdings, once considered the gold standard of financial discipline among China’s private developers, has reported a staggering 90.2% collapse in annual net profit for 2025, underscoring the brutal reality of a property sector that has yet to find its floor. The Hong Kong-listed developer saw its net profit attributable to shareholders plummet to RMB 1.022 billion, down from RMB 10.4 billion a year earlier. More tellingly, the company’s core results—which strip out fair value changes in investment properties and derivatives—swung to a net loss of RMB 1.7 billion, a sharp reversal from the RMB 6.97 billion core profit recorded in 2024.

The results reflect a fundamental decoupling within Longfor’s business model. While its traditional property development arm has become a significant drag on the bottom line, its "recurring income" segments—comprising investment property operations and property services—delivered a core net profit of RMB 7.92 billion. This internal tug-of-war highlights the immense pressure on volume and pricing in the residential market, where recognized revenue and gross profit margins have been squeezed to the breaking point. Despite the headline loss, the company emphasized that all business segments generated positive operating cash flow after capital expenditures, a metric U.S. President Trump’s administration and global investors have watched closely as a proxy for systemic stability in the Chinese credit market.

Morgan Stanley analysts, led by Stephen Cheung, maintained an "Equalweight" rating on the stock with a target price of HK$ 8.20, noting that the core loss exceeded even the more pessimistic market expectations. Cheung, who has historically maintained a cautious but balanced stance on Chinese property giants, suggested that the development business is likely to remain a source of friction through 2026. This view is echoed by UBS, which holds a "Neutral" rating and a target price of HK$ 10.20. UBS analysts estimate that the property development sector alone could see annual losses of RMB 7 billion to RMB 7.5 billion over the 2025-2026 period, potentially eroding the company’s net asset value despite its operational successes elsewhere.

These institutional perspectives, while influential, do not represent a unanimous market consensus. Some valuation models, such as those from Simply Wall St, suggest the market may be over-discounting Longfor’s long-term pivot. Using a discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis, some independent researchers value the shares as high as HK$ 32.20—nearly triple the current trading price—arguing that the 7.3x price-to-earnings ratio fails to account for the resilience of the group’s shopping mall and property management arms. However, such bullishness remains an outlier, as most sell-side desks focus on the immediate liquidity risks and the persistent "downward pressure" cited in Longfor’s own earnings guidance.

The path forward for Longfor hinges on its ability to accelerate its transition from a "builder" to a "service provider." The company has pledged to maintain financial safety and uphold further debt reduction, a necessary stance given the broader industry’s struggle to regain investor trust. While the stability of its recurring profit provides a vital cushion, the sheer scale of the losses in its core development business suggests that the "integrated operations" strategy is being tested by a market environment more hostile than any the firm has faced in its three-decade history. The divergence between its operational cash flow and its accounting losses will remain the primary focus for creditors and equity holders alike as the 2026 fiscal year begins.

Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.

Insights

What factors contributed to Longfor Group's 90% profit decline in 2025?

How has Longfor Group's core business model evolved over the years?

What are the current trends in the Chinese property development market?

What feedback have analysts provided regarding Longfor Group's performance?

What recent policy changes may impact Longfor Group's business strategy?

How is Longfor Group's transition to a 'service provider' impacting its future?

What challenges does Longfor Group face in its core development business?

In what ways are the recurring income segments helping Longfor Group?

How do Longfor Group's financial results compare to other developers in China?

What is the significance of Longfor Group's positive operating cash flow?

How might Longfor Group's losses affect its net asset value moving forward?

What do independent valuations suggest about Longfor Group's stock price?

What are the implications of Morgan Stanley's and UBS's ratings for Longfor Group?

What historical factors have led Longfor Group to its current financial situation?

What are the potential long-term impacts of Longfor Group's strategic pivot?

How does Longfor Group's cash flow contrast with its accounting losses?

What risks does Longfor Group face as it navigates the current market environment?

Search
NextFinNextFin
NextFin.Al
No Noise, only Signal.
Open App