On February 3, 2026, Netflix Co-Chief Executive Officer Ted Sarandos appeared before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy, and Consumer Rights in Washington, D.C. The hearing, led by Senator Mike Lee, focused on the streaming giant’s ambitious $82.7 billion bid to acquire the streaming and studio businesses of Warner Bros. Discovery. Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle questioned Sarandos on how the consolidation of two of the world’s largest content libraries—including iconic franchises like "Harry Potter," "Game of Thrones," and the DC Universe—would impact consumer pricing, industry wages, and the survival of smaller competitors.
The scrutiny comes at a pivotal moment for the entertainment industry. According to Reuters, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is currently conducting a rigorous review of the transaction, which was first announced in late 2025. During the hearing, Sarandos argued that the merger is a necessary evolution to compete in a global market where Google’s YouTube continues to dominate total television viewing time. However, Lee expressed skepticism, questioning whether Netflix’s move was a genuine strategic acquisition or a tactical play to stall Warner Bros.’ growth during a lengthy regulatory process. The Senator also raised alarms regarding Netflix’s potential early access to Warner Bros.’ sensitive internal data, which could provide an unfair algorithmic advantage even if the deal is eventually blocked.
From an analytical perspective, the primary point of contention lies in "market definition." Netflix is attempting to frame the competitive landscape as the broad "attention economy," which includes everything from social media to video games. By this metric, Netflix’s market share appears manageable. Conversely, regulators are likely to apply a narrower lens, focusing specifically on the Subscription Video on Demand (SVOD) market. In this segment, a combined Netflix-Warner entity would control a staggering portion of premium original content and library titles, potentially creating a barrier to entry that no new startup could overcome. This concentration of "must-have" content gives the merged entity immense leverage over internet service providers and advertisers, a classic antitrust red flag.
The financial stakes are further complicated by a competing hostile bid from Paramount Skydance. Led by David Ellison, Paramount has positioned itself as the "regulatory-friendly" alternative, arguing that its merger would result in less market concentration than a Netflix takeover. However, Warner Bros. has repeatedly rebuffed Paramount’s advances, citing concerns over the high debt levels required to fund the Ellison-led bid. The political undertones are equally significant; the Ellison family’s ties to U.S. President Trump’s administration add a layer of complexity to the DOJ’s decision-making process, as the executive branch’s stance on big-tech consolidation remains a volatile variable in 2026.
Data from Nielsen and other media analysts suggest that while Netflix remains the leader in paid subscriptions, the acquisition of Warner Bros.’ studio assets would transform it from a distribution powerhouse into a vertical monopoly. If the deal proceeds, Netflix would not only own the platform but also the production pipelines for a significant plurality of Hollywood’s output. This vertical integration often leads to "self-preferencing," where a platform’s own content is promoted at the expense of third-party creators, a practice that has already drawn the ire of European regulators and is now a central theme in the U.S. Senate’s inquiry.
Looking ahead, the path to approval for Sarandos and Netflix remains fraught with obstacles. The DOJ review is expected to last well into 2027, leaving the industry in a state of strategic limbo. If the merger is approved, it will likely come with heavy divestiture requirements—potentially forcing Netflix to sell off certain cable networks or licensing rights to maintain a semblance of competition. If blocked, it may signal the end of the era of mega-mergers in media, forcing companies to pivot toward organic growth or smaller, niche acquisitions. For now, the February 3 hearing serves as a clear warning: the era of unchecked expansion for streaming giants is facing its most significant legal and political challenge yet.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.