NextFin News - Nomura's Yujiro Goto says further Bank of Japan rate hikes are "possible," adding to a chorus of signals that the central bank is preparing to tighten faster than the roughly twice-a-year pace it has kept since exiting negative rates. The comment lands as markets price an approximately 80% chance of a 25-basis-point increase at the September 17-18 policy meeting — which would lift the benchmark rate to 1.25%, a level not seen since the mid-1990s — and as Governor Kazuo Ueda tells G20 counterparts that every meeting, including this month's, is live for a hike.
The real question is no longer whether the BOJ moves in September. It is whether a second and third move follow quickly enough to matter — and whether the bank can tighten into a softening economy without reigniting the carry-trade shock that rattled global markets in 2024.
The Setup: A September Move Is Priced; The Pace Is Not
The facts have aligned quickly. On September 2, speaking on the sidelines of the Group of 20 gathering in Asheville, North Carolina, Ueda said the Bank of Japan will consider a rate increase at every policy meeting, including the one scheduled for September 17-18. "We hope to continue raising interest rates as financial conditions remain accommodative," he said. "On the other hand, we've raised rates five times so far, so we need to carefully assess the cumulative impact on the economy." He added that policy would be set "mindful of upside risks to inflation."
That is a more open door than the bank offered in July, when it held rates at 1.0% but flagged a strong chance of a near-term increase. The rate now sits at a 31-year high, its highest level since September 1995, after the June 16 hike from 0.75% to 1.0% — part of a climb from minus 0.1% in 2024 that has been the slowest, most telegraphed normalization in modern central-banking history.
Markets have taken the hint. Money-market pricing implies roughly a 76% to 80% probability of a 25-basis-point hike this month, up from about 24% at the end of July, according to Tokyo Tanshi data. In a monthly poll of economists conducted August 17-24, 57% of respondents expected the BOJ to raise rates in September, a sharp turnaround from the July survey, when just 5% expected a move this quarter. A majority expect the benchmark to reach 1.25% in September, and nearly two-thirds — 35 of 54 — see it at 1.5% or higher by the end of March 2027, three months earlier than they did in the previous month's poll. About 60% expect at least 1.75% by the end of the third quarter of 2027. Of the 36 respondents who answered a separate question on the terminal rate, half named 1.75%, while the share expecting 2% or higher rose to 36% from 23% in July.
Into that consensus steps Nomura's Goto, whose role as head of FX strategy for Japan makes his read on the yen-policy nexus a market-moving input. His view that further hikes are "possible" is not a forecast of a specific date, but it is a confirmation that the policy direction is no longer in doubt. The debate has moved one step downstream: not if, but how fast.
Why the BOJ Cannot Wait: Yen, Inflation, and the Intervention Trap
The pressure on the BOJ is not coming from growth. It is coming from the currency and from prices the central bank does not fully control.
The yen touched 163.99 per dollar in late July, its weakest level since 1986, before a rare joint intervention with the United States on July 31 sent it back to 157.40. Tokyo and Washington then kept buying: the Ministry of Finance disclosed that it spent 15.39 trillion yen, about $96 billion, supporting the currency between July 30 and August 26 — the largest single intervention round on record, and part of roughly $170 billion of intervention this year. President Donald Trump confirmed the coordinated action aboard Air Force One, calling it a "signal of friendship."
Intervention, however, is a bridge, not a destination. It can blunt a disorderly move for days or weeks, but it cannot close a 4-percentage-point interest-rate gap or change the terms of trade for an energy importer. That is why the BOJ's own officials have framed further tightening as the only durable tool. Seiji Adachi, a former BOJ Policy Board member, warned that keeping policy unchanged could trigger another yen sell-off and faster inflation from higher import costs.
The inflation data give the hawks their opening. Japan's headline consumer-price index rose 1.9% year-on-year in July, up from 1.6% in June, while core inflation (excluding fresh food) was 1.8% and the core-core measure (excluding food and energy) was 1.9%. Month-on-month, prices rose 0.4%. Corporate prices are far hotter: the corporate goods-price index climbed 7.2% year-on-year in July, the fastest pace since February 2023, meaning import-cost pressure is still working through the supply chain.
Here is the mechanism the market should be watching. A weaker yen raises the price of imported energy and food, which lifts headline inflation and feeds into corporate input costs, which then shows up in the CGPI and eventually in consumer prices. The BOJ's central scenario already expects underlying inflation to reach a level "broadly consistent" with its 2% target between the second half of fiscal 2026 and fiscal 2027. If the yen stays weak, that timeline compresses — and the bank risks being behind the curve rather than ahead of it.
"We hope to continue raising interest rates as financial conditions remain accommodative. On the other hand, we've raised rates five times so far, so we need to carefully assess the cumulative impact on the economy."
That is Kazuo Ueda, BOJ Governor, speaking in Asheville on September 2, 2026 — the tightrope in a single sentence.
The Counter-Thesis: Tightening Into a Soft Patch Is How Shocks Happen
The strongest case against a faster pace is not that inflation is fake. It is that the economy is too fragile to absorb it, and that a defensive hike — one made to defend the yen rather than because domestic demand is overheating — can do more damage than a weak currency.
The data support that worry. Second-quarter GDP grew just 0.3% quarter-on-quarter, below the 0.5% forecast, though it was a third consecutive expansion. Private consumption was flat. Capital expenditure fell 1.2%. Only net exports, helped by the weak yen, added meaningfully to growth — 0.5 percentage points. Small and medium enterprises are already breaking: corporate bankruptcies involving liabilities of at least 10 million yen climbed to 5,346 in the first half of 2026, the highest first-half total in 12 years and the fifth consecutive annual increase, according to credit research firm Tokyo Shoko Research.
This is the same configuration that produced the August 2024 carry-trade unwind: a BOJ move that markets read as the start of a faster cycle, combined with a Federal Reserve pivot signal, compressing the rate differential from both ends at once. The difference this time is that a September hike is widely expected and partly priced, which reduces the surprise element. But expectation is not the same as resilience. If the BOJ signals a quarterly pace while U.S. data stay firm — Fed Chair Kevin Warsh warned at Jackson Hole on August 28 that rates may need to rise if inflation does not ease — the differential may not compress enough to stabilize the yen, yet the tightening could still tip Japanese borrowers.
There is also a political economy constraint that Goto himself flagged in late 2025: public sentiment. Inflation has run ahead of wage gains, real wages have been negative in real terms for long stretches, and concern about the cost of living is high in the polls. Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's government is reportedly supportive of a near-term hike — the next move likely in September or October — because a stronger yen eases energy import costs. But a government that favors supportive monetary policy in general may not tolerate a rapid series of hikes if growth stalls.
Second-Order Effect: The Last Anchor of the Low-Yield Regime Is Coming Loose
The first-order effect of a BOJ hike is mechanical: a higher policy rate narrows the U.S.-Japan rate gap, supports the yen, and lifts Japanese government-bond yields. That is the trade everyone is positioned for.
The second-order effect is what matters more. For three decades, the BOJ was the marginal buyer of last resort in global bond markets — the institution whose zero-rate policy forced investors to hunt for yield anywhere on earth, funding everything from U.S. Treasuries to emerging-market debt through the yen carry trade. Every 25-basis-point hike removes a layer of that forced demand. It does not just strengthen the yen; it raises the global term premium, because the investor base that bought duration at zero no longer needs to reach as far.
The bond market is already pricing that. Japan's 10-year yield touched 3.0% on September 1, its highest since 1996, before easing to 2.97% on September 3. The 30-year yield set an all-time high of 4.21% this month. These moves are not just about Japanese monetary policy; they are about the price of long-duration risk in a world where the cheapest funding currency is no longer free.
For global asset allocators, the transmission channel runs through three doors. First, Japanese insurers and pension funds, sitting on the largest pool of domestic savings in the world, have less incentive to hedge foreign-currency exposure when the hedging cost rises with rate differentials — which can pull capital back home and reduce demand for U.S. and European bonds. Second, the carry trade itself becomes more expensive to fund, squeezing the leverage that has supported risk assets. Third, a stronger yen lowers Japan's export competitiveness, which shows up in the earnings of Japanese multinationals and in the regional supply chain.
This is why Oxford Economics, in a note published August 31, raised its forecast for the policy rate to 1.75% via hikes in September, December, and April 2027, and lifted its estimate of the nominal neutral rate to 1.75% from 1.5%. It also warned that if the yen weakens further on fiscal concerns, the BOJ may need to push to 2% by July 2027. Fitch, by contrast, thinks the bank will wait until October and then move faster than markets expect. The dispersion matters: when institutions disagree on the terminal rate by 50 basis points and on the timing by a meeting, the path is not priced — only the next step is.
Cyclical or Structural? Both, and That Is the Problem
The cyclical-versus-structural call here has to be split in two, because the answer differs depending on which variable you ask about.
The yen's weakness is cyclical. It is driven by the interest-rate differential, elevated energy prices from the Middle East conflict, and fiscal noise from Tokyo. Each of those can mean-revert: the differential closes as the BOJ hikes and the Fed holds or cuts, oil prices settle, and intervention smooths volatility. A cyclical driver does not require a permanent policy change; it requires enough tightening to restore parity, then a pause.
The normalization of Japanese monetary policy, however, is structural. This is a regime shift away from three decades of deflation-fighting accommodation, and it will not reverse on its own. The evidence is in the structure, not the cycle: headline inflation has exceeded the 2% target for around four years, the labor market is tight, wage growth is at historic highs, and inflation expectations have risen. Fitch's assessment is that reflation is entrenched. Once a central bank has convinced the private sector that 2% inflation is the norm rather than the exception, returning to zero rates would require re-anchoring expectations downward — a far harder task than raising rates was.
The problem is where the two interact. A structural normalization executed against a cyclical yen squeeze risks overtightening. If the BOJ hikes to defend the currency and the currency strengthens anyway on oil or fiscal news, the bank is left with rates that are too high for the domestic cycle. That is the error the 2024 episode exposed: the BOJ's March 2024 exit from negative rates was followed by a July hike that helped trigger a global equity selloff, because the market read the pace as accelerating just as the Fed was turning dovish.
The judgment, then: the direction is structural and durable; the pace is cyclical and reversible. The BOJ will keep moving up, but the distance between hikes will depend on the yen and on U.S. data as much as on Japanese inflation.
What to Watch: The Signals That Decide the Pace
Three data points will determine whether "possible" becomes "probable" for a December follow-up. First, the September 17-18 statement and Ueda's press conference: the key phrase to watch is whether the bank describes the outlook as one where "upside risks to inflation" are "heightening," language Ueda used in Asheville. Second, the Tokyo CPI reading for September, released late in the month, which will be the first inflation print after the decision. Third, USD/JPY itself — if the yen holds above 160 per dollar after a September hike, the market will read the move as insufficient and price more, forcing the bank's hand.
The falsifying signal is specific: if core CPI (excluding food and energy) prints below 0.2% month-on-month for two consecutive months, or if the yen trades above 160 per dollar a week after the September meeting despite a hike, the faster-hike thesis is wrong. Either outcome would say that domestic demand is too weak to sustain inflation, or that the rate differential is too wide for 25 basis points to matter — and in both cases the BOJ would be forced to pause and reassess, exactly as Ueda's "cumulative impact" language warns.
Outlook: Scenarios Across Time Horizons
Base case. The BOJ hikes 25 basis points to 1.25% on September 18, signals that further gradual moves are likely, and follows with another hike in December or January, then one more in the fiscal year beginning April 2027 — a pace of roughly once per quarter, faster than the current twice-a-year rhythm but not aggressive. The yen strengthens toward 155-156 by year-end, consistent with Fitch's forecast, and the 10-year JGB yield settles in the 2.75%-3.00% range.
Upside case (faster tightening). If core inflation accelerates above 2% and the yen fails to stabilize, the BOJ could compress the timeline: a September hike followed by moves in October or November and again in early 2027, reaching 1.75% by mid-2027 as Oxford Economics projects. In that scenario the yen could test 150, JGB yields break higher, and the global carry trade faces its steepest funding-cost increase since 2024.
Downside case (pause or reversal). If GDP contracts in the third quarter, SME bankruptcies accelerate, or the Fed under Warsh holds U.S. rates higher for longer without a yen response, the BOJ could hike in September and then stop. In the most severe version — a repeat of the 2024 dynamic where tightening triggers a risk-off shock — the bank could be forced to walk back guidance, as it did after the July 2024 episode. That is the tail that keeps Ueda cautious.
Across horizons, the read differs. In the short term, sentiment and positioning dominate: the yen and JGB yields will move on every BOJ speaker and every U.S. inflation print. Over the medium term, fundamentals decide: whether wage growth sustains consumption and whether firms can pass through costs. Over the long term, the structural shift is the story — Japan has left the zero-rate era, and it is not coming back.
The kicker: The BOJ's September hike is the easy part. The hard part is hiking fast enough to defend the yen without breaking an economy that is already showing cracks — and every 25 basis points now costs the global market more than it did when the world's cheapest currency was free.
Data as of September 3, 2026. Market probabilities reflect Tokyo Tanshi and money-market pricing cited in the sources above.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
