NextFin news, Nvidia Corporation, the leading AI chipmaker headquartered in Santa Clara, California, has issued a confidential seven-page memo responding decisively to emerging allegations that the current surge in artificial intelligence investments represents a speculative bubble. This memo was disseminated to Nvidia’s institutional shareholders worldwide on November 24-25, 2025, immediately following the release of its strong Q3 fiscal results. The thrust of the communication directly addresses skepticism amplified by investor Michael Burry, who has publicized concerns including potential circular financing due to Nvidia’s equity stakes in AI startups that also purchase its GPUs, inflated earnings through atypical depreciation schedules, and a questionable buildup in inventories and accounts receivable.
Nvidia asserts that the 32% jump in its inventories is a strategic maneuver geared toward ensuring an uninterrupted supply chain for its highly anticipated next-generation Blackwell GPU platform, with pre-sold systems expected to drive a robust $65 billion revenue guidance for Q4 2025. The company clarified that its shipments follow stringent credit assessments, effectively countering fears of latent demand weakness or payment delays. Furthermore, Nvidia highlighted that its accounts receivables collection cycle has improved to 52 days, better than both the previous quarter and long-term averages, implying sound customer payment health.
The memo also takes issue with Burry's characterization of Nvidia's investments in startups, such as OpenAI, as creating a closed-loop financing dynamic that obscures real market demand. Nvidia quantifies this exposure at a minimal 3% to 7% of overall revenue, positioning it as an insignificant factor in the company’s financial stability. Burry also criticized Nvidia’s depreciation policies, alleging cloud operators like Microsoft and Amazon Web Services inflate earnings by extending GPU depreciation beyond reasonable periods. Nvidia rebutted by emphasizing that the four to six-year depreciation window employed by its major customers adheres to industry norms and is validated by the extended productive lifespan of older GPU models.
Additionally, the memo addresses renewed scrutiny over Nvidia’s capital allocation, specifically its $100 billion-plus share repurchase program since 2018. Nvidia defends the strategy by illustrating how past buybacks at average prices near $51 per share have boosted earnings per share by 5%, subsequently creating over $200 billion in market value for shareholders, despite a marginal increase in share count due to stock-based compensation.
Internally, CEO Jensen Huang is reported to have counseled employees to focus on long-term execution and fundamentals amid volatile market reactions. Nvidia maintains that demand for its data center GPUs continues to exceed supply, with next-generation products largely sold out ahead of release dates, and utilization rates of older architecture GPUs remaining robust. This explicit repudiation of the bubble narrative through a granular, data-rich shareholder memo highlights Nvidia’s strategic imperative to reassert control over the AI investment narrative and calm investor concerns.
From an analytical vantage, Nvidia’s rebuttal signifies a pivotal moment in the maturing AI industry investment cycle. The company’s focus on fundamental metrics—like inventory management tied to product launches rather than speculative stockpiling—signals operational prudence geared towards sustaining supply chain reliability in a hyper-competitive market. The transparency around receivables and depreciation methodologies also suggests a proactive stance against accusations of accounting irregularities, especially important given the high-stakes environment around AI-capable semiconductors.
The dispute over circular financing touches on a broader trend of tech giants increasingly investing in complementary AI startups, creating intricate ecosystems where hardware suppliers have vested interests in their clients. While Nvidia minimizes revenue exposure from such investments, the scenario raises questions about how capital flows in AI markets could mask true external demand from independent customers, warranting ongoing scrutiny.
Moreover, the defense of share repurchases amid dilution concerns provides insight into Nvidia’s capital return philosophy that prioritizes long-term shareholder value. As equity compensation programs continue to expand with workforce growth, balancing buybacks with employee incentives will remain a key governance issue.
Looking forward, the outcome of such public disputes will likely shape regulatory and market perceptions of AI sector valuations. Nvidia’s efforts to substantiate demand resilience ahead of the Blackwell platform rollout position it well to capitalize on expanding data center AI workloads. However, persistent doubts fueled by high-profile skeptics could temper investor exuberance, potentially leading to greater volatility around tech valuations.
In sum, Nvidia’s secret memo and its reference to Michael Burry underscore the heightening tension between optimistic AI growth projections and the realism demanded by rigorous financial analysis. The memo serves not only as a rebuttal but also as a strategic communication tool aimed at stabilizing investor confidence during a delicate phase of AI market evolution, where fundamental validation and narrative control are paramount.
According to CNBC, this confidential investor communication is Nvidia’s latest maneuver in an ongoing battle over the legitimacy and sustainability of AI-driven market euphoria, reflecting both the technological promise and financial complexities embedded in the rapidly evolving AI ecosystem.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
