U.S./Israel-Iran War: the Middle East On Edge
NextFin News - The Korean won is trading near a two-year high while the Philippine peso just broke to a fresh low, and the gap between them is no accident. Surging crude prices and the artificial-intelligence investment boom are pulling emerging Asia's currencies in opposite directions, splitting the region into two camps: economies that sell chips and attract data-center capital, and economies that buy oil and watch their import bills swell.
The divergence is relative, not absolute. Nearly every emerging Asian currency has lost ground against a dollar index that is up almost 3% in 2026. But the distance between the winners and the losers has widened into the region's defining foreign-exchange story of the year, driven by two forces that show no sign of fading: an energy supply shock rooted in the Middle East, and a technology investment cycle that is redrawing Asia's export and capital-flow map.
The Two-Tier Currency Market
Asia's dollar gauge is rising, but underneath it sits a two-tier market. The Philippine peso, the region's worst-performing currency in 2026, hit a new low against the dollar on Tuesday. Indonesia's rupiah is hovering near its own record low. Thailand's baht is sitting close to an 18-month trough. The Korean won, by contrast, is trading around its strongest level in two years and has been the clear regional outperformer.
The numbers draw the dividing line cleanly. Year-to-date against the dollar, the Singapore dollar has slipped 0.28%, the Malaysian ringgit 0.67%, the won 1.64%, and the Taiwan dollar 3.05%. The energy importers have fared worse across the board: the peso is down 4.48%, the Thai baht 5.97%, the Indian rupee 6.01%, and Indonesia's rupiah leads the declines at 7.30%. Even the weakest AI-linked currency has beaten the strongest energy importer by more than a percentage point. That spread — not any single currency's absolute level — is the story.
Goldman Sachs has made the call explicit, ranking the South Korean won, Taiwan dollar, and Malaysian ringgit above energy importers such as the Thai baht and Indonesian rupiah, arguing that the AI investment boom now shapes Asia's foreign-exchange market more than any other single factor. The bank's reasoning rests on a simple accounting identity: a country that sells high-value technology into a booming global market runs a bigger trade surplus, while a country that imports energy at triple-digit crude prices runs a bigger deficit. The exchange rate is where those two ledger entries meet.
"AI is driving emerging Asia FX through export receipts and equity inflows, with the Taiwan dollar and won best placed for that to continue," analysts wrote in a September research note.
The Oil Shock: Why It Hits Some Currencies Harder
The oil leg of the trade is straightforward in mechanism and unforgiving in scale. Brent crude was trading near $110 a barrel late in the week of October 27, after futures climbed to a five-month high close to $112 earlier in the month. The rally has been fed by a conflict between the United States and Iran now in its seventh month, Houthi attacks on Saudi energy infrastructure, and disrupted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, the chokepoint through which a large share of the world's seaborne oil passes.
For a net energy importer, every $10 rise in Brent is a direct transfer of national income abroad. The Philippines, Thailand, and Indonesia sit on the wrong side of that transfer. Their import bills swell, their trade balances deteriorate, and their central banks face a brutal choice: let the currency absorb the shock and import inflation, or defend the exchange rate and sacrifice growth. The peso's break to a new low is the market's verdict on that dilemma.
The inflation arithmetic is unfriendly. When fuel and freight costs rise, they feed through to electricity tariffs, food logistics, and manufacturing input costs within weeks, not quarters. The Philippine central bank has flagged inflation risks from energy costs, with its 2%-4% target band under pressure. A currency that weakens while inflation accelerates is a currency whose real purchasing power is being squeezed twice over.
Wall Street's own expectations underscore how entrenched the shock has become. A survey of major banks, including Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, and Morgan Stanley, puts Brent crude at an average of $90.22 a barrel in the fourth quarter of 2026, with West Texas Intermediate at $85.47 — sharply above the $78.92 and $74.62 forecasts that prevailed before the escalation. The market is no longer pricing a quick resolution.
The AI Boom: Export Receipts and Equity Inflows
On the other side of the divide, the AI investment boom is doing two things at once. It is lifting export receipts for the economies that make the hardware, and it is pulling equity capital into the economies that host the infrastructure.
South Korea carries the strongest case. Goldman Sachs economists forecast the country's current-account surplus will almost double to roughly $300 billion in 2026, equal to 13.9% of gross domestic product. Semiconductor shipments have been the engine: annual chip exports reached a record $173 billion in 2025, up 22.2% from $142 billion the year before, and semiconductor exports have climbed by almost 42% in the most recent period. That is not a broad-based export miracle — it is a concentrated AI-driven one, and it is visible in the currency.
"Reduced foreign equity outflows has lessened offset to surging current account surplus, paving way for [the won's] rally," Goldman Sachs wrote in its report.
The second channel runs through capital flows rather than trade. Taiwan's current-account surplus is projected to reach 25% of GDP this year, supported by surging semiconductor exports and a widening trade balance. Malaysia has attracted foreign investment into higher-value manufacturing and data centers, and its ringgit touched its strongest level since May 2018 earlier this year on AI optimism. These are not countries whose entire economies have been transformed overnight; they are countries where a single high-multiplier sector is large enough to move the national accounts.
The data-center buildout adds a second-order layer. Southeast Asia's data-center project pipeline could more than triple to 9.4 gigawatts by 2035, up from 2.8 gigawatts today, according to Wood Mackenzie. Power demand from hyperscalers is projected to jump from 17 terawatt-hours to 57 terawatt-hours, and the consultancy expects the boom to lift the region's annual liquefied natural-gas demand growth by 16% through 2035, because gas turbines remain the most reliable 24/7 power source while battery storage matures. That dynamic is a tailwind for Malaysia's investment inflows and a cost pressure for Thailand's import bill — the same two forces, working in opposite directions on neighboring economies.
Why This Is Structural, Not Cyclical
The critical question is whether this divide is a cyclical fluctuation that will mean-revert or a structural shift that will persist. The answer is both, and separating them matters for the conclusion.
The oil leg is cyclical. Oil shocks are, by history, mean-reverting events: supply disruptions spike prices, high prices destroy demand and unlock new supply, and the price comes back down. The 1973 embargo, the 1979 revolution, the 1990 Gulf War, and the 2022 Ukraine invasion all produced sharp spikes followed by partial or full retracements. If Brent falls back toward $80, the pressure on the peso, baht, and rupiah eases mechanically. This leg will revert when the supply shock resolves.
The AI leg is different. It is structural, because it rests on a regime change in the global capital-stock cycle rather than a temporary price dislocation. The buildout of AI data centers is a multi-year capital-expenditure program embedded in corporate guidance, not a quarterly inventory swing. The semiconductor demand it creates is concentrated in a handful of economies with the fabrication plants, the advanced-packaging capacity, and the power infrastructure to serve it, and that concentration does not self-correct. A currency whose support comes from a structural reallocation of global capital expenditure will not mean-revert on its own; it will hold its premium for as long as the capex cycle runs.
That is why the divergence is likely to persist even if oil retreats. The oil shock explains the depth of the losers' underperformance; the AI cycle explains why the winners have a floor that the losers lack. When the oil spike fades, the importers will recover some ground. But they will recover toward a regional average that has itself been re-rated by the AI capital cycle.
The Counter-Thesis: It Is All Just Dollar Strength
The strongest argument against reading too much into this split is that every AI-linked currency is still down against the dollar in 2026. The Taiwan dollar, the supposed beneficiary of the semiconductor supercycle, has fallen 3.05%. The ringgit and the won are down too. If the AI boom were truly reshaping these currencies, the argument runs, they would be rising in absolute terms, not merely falling less than their neighbors.
That objection is correct as far as it goes, and it points to the real hierarchy of forces. The dollar index is up nearly 3% this year, and broad dollar strength driven by U.S. rates and risk sentiment is a tide that lifts or lowers every emerging-market boat. The AI-oil split is a second-order effect layered on top of that tide — powerful enough to determine relative performance within Asia, but not powerful enough to overcome a rising dollar on its own.
The counter-thesis goes further: if oil prices stay elevated long enough to tip the region into a general risk-off episode, or if the Federal Reserve keeps rates higher for longer, the two-tier market could collapse into a single-tier selloff where correlations rise and the AI premium disappears. That is a real risk, and it is the scenario in which this analysis would be wrong.
The falsifying signal is specific and observable. If Brent crude sustains levels above $115-$120 a barrel for a month or more, the oil-importer current accounts break structurally rather than cyclically, inflation expectations unanchor, and the region's central banks are forced into competitive defense — at which point the oil shock stops being a relative-pressure story and becomes a broad emerging-market risk event that overwhelms the AI split. Conversely, if hyperscaler capital-expenditure guidance for 2027 is cut by more than 10%, the equity-inflow and export-receipt channel reverses, and the AI-linked currencies lose the buffer that has insulated them. Either threshold would invalidate the two-tier framework.
What to Watch Next
In the short term, the peso, rupiah, and baht remain exposed to the next oil headline. Any escalation in the Middle East that pushes Brent decisively above $110 will test the recent lows again, and the central banks of the net importers will be forced to choose between inflation defense and currency defense — a choice that usually ends with both being compromised.
Over the medium term, the won and the Taiwan dollar will be governed by the semiconductor cycle. Their strength is tied to chip demand, and chip demand is tied to the AI capex program. The data to watch is not the daily FX print but the quarterly export numbers and the hyperscaler guidance that drives them. As long as semiconductor shipments keep climbing and the current-account surplus widens toward the $300 billion forecast, the won's support is fundamental rather than speculative.
In the long term, the structural question is whether Southeast Asia's data-center buildout becomes a durable source of capital inflows for the region or a one-time construction boom. Malaysia is best positioned to capture the inflow side; Thailand and Indonesia face the cost side unless they can convert data-center investment into domestic export capacity. The countries that turn power demand into exportable compute or semiconductor content will join the winner's camp; the countries that only import the energy will stay in the loser's camp.
The base case is that the divide holds: oil stays elevated enough to keep pressure on the importers, and AI capex stays intact enough to keep a floor under the chip exporters. The upside case for the region is a negotiated end to the Middle East conflict that sends Brent back toward $80, giving the importers room to recover while the AI exporters retain their structural premium. The downside case is a simultaneous oil spike and AI capex cut, which would turn a two-tier market into a one-tier rout.
The oil shock is a bill that emerging Asia's importers must pay today. The AI boom is a bet that a few of its exporters placed years ago, and the currency market is now collecting on it. The divide between them is not a market quirk — it is the price signal of two different futures, and until one of the two forces breaks, the gap is the trade.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
