NextFin News - Pop Mart International Group Ltd.'s quarterly sales fell in the third quarter of 2026, as the Labubu doll maker collided with two headwinds at once: a punishing year-over-year comparison base and cooling demand for the collectible toys that powered its record run. The Hong Kong-listed company, whose shares have lost roughly 55% from their September peak, now faces the question that has trailed its 185% revenue surge in 2025: was the Labubu boom a durable franchise or a fad that peaked too fast?
Pop Mart does not publish quarterly financial reports, so the third-quarter figures come from analyst channel checks and third-party monitoring data rather than an official filing. JPMorgan estimated on October 21 that third-quarter revenue fell about 37% year over year, with the decline narrowing to roughly 23% in the fourth quarter, and full-year adjusted net profit dropping 27% to about 9.34 billion yuan. The bank also flagged that overseas revenue fell an estimated 44% in the second quarter and that overseas operating margin had contracted 14 percentage points to 30%.
On the day the report circulated, shares inched lower. Pop Mart closed at HK$132.00, down 0.75%, with 7.7 million shares changing hands and market capitalization of HK$174.3 billion, according to market data. The move was muted partly because the deterioration had been telegraphed for months — the stock is down 29.6% year to date and 42.9% over the past twelve months, trading near its lowest range since April 2025.
The Numbers Behind the Slowdown
The third-quarter drop is best understood against the backdrop of what came before. In 2025, Pop Mart's revenue more than doubled, rising 185% to 37.12 billion yuan, with net income of 12.8 billion yuan. That created a comparison base that few consumer companies could clear without another blockbuster. The first half of 2026 still showed growth — revenue rose 23.8% to 17.17 billion yuan, with profit attributable to owners up 10.1% to 5.04 billion yuan — but the composition had already shifted. China revenue jumped 47.3%, while Asia-Pacific excluding China fell 9.7% and the Americas dropped 16.5%.
The overseas engine, which had been the main reason investors paid a premium for the stock, was stalling. Citi said overseas sales fell 11% year over year in the first half and cut its full-year revenue forecast to an 8% decline, lowering its price target to HK$198. Management told analysts it now viewed its initial 20% growth target for 2026 as difficult to reach.
"The high base from last year's outstanding performance has created pressure for this year, which will be more pronounced in the second half," Chief Executive Wang Ning said on the earnings call.
That single sentence captures the mechanical half of the problem. A base effect is arithmetic: when last year's third quarter was extraordinary, this year's growth rate looks weak even if absolute sales hold up. But the numbers underneath suggest the base effect is only the visible part of a deeper shift. Overseas revenue did not merely slow — it reversed. An 11% decline in the first half, an estimated 44% plunge in the second quarter, and a projected 37% drop in the third quarter is not a comparison artifact; it is three consecutive quarters of contraction in the region that investors had priced as the growth engine.
Inside the product mix, the dependence on a single character is visible in the numbers. THE MONSTERS family, home to Labubu, generated 4.45 billion yuan in the first half — 26% of total revenue, down from 34.7% a year earlier. The share fell not because Labubu collapsed outright, but because the rest of the portfolio could not keep pace. TWINKLE TWINKLE, the fastest-growing IP, rose 580.6% to 2.65 billion yuan, yet that still left the company searching for a second pillar. CRYBABY, DIMOO, SKULLPANDA, HIRONO and MOLLY each contributed between 0.9 billion and 1.63 billion yuan — respectable, but not enough to offset a Labubu slowdown. The concentration risk has not disappeared; it has merely been relabeled.
Why the High Base Is Only Half the Story
The evidence for a structural problem sits in the leading indicators that precede reported revenue. Resale prices for Labubu figures softened through the summer — the secondary market is widely watched as an early-warning system for collectible demand, because it clears in real time while company reports lag by weeks. U.S. credit-card spending on Pop Mart fell roughly 40% year over year in the second quarter. U.S. Instagram followers declined from March until bottoming in September, a social-media proxy for brand heat that turned positive only after the sales damage was already done. And inventory was building: stock on hand rose to 6.10 billion yuan at June 30 from 5.47 billion yuan at the end of 2025, an 11.5% increase that suggests supply was running ahead of sell-through.
These are not the signatures of a one-quarter base effect. They are the signatures of a demand curve that has passed its inflection point. In collectibles, the demand curve is steeper than in ordinary consumer goods because scarcity is part of the product. When a character is hot, scarcity drives resale premiums, resale premiums drive hype, and hype drives primary-market sell-through. When the character cools, the loop reverses: resale premiums compress, hype fades, and the primary market is left with inventory that was produced for a demand level that no longer exists. That is the mechanism behind the 11.5% inventory build — and it is why the third-quarter revenue decline is more likely a regime shift than a calendar quirk.
The structural issue is the franchise model itself. Pop Mart's economics depend on a rotating cast of hit characters, and the company has never had to prove it can manufacture hits at will. In 2025, Labubu carried the entire growth story. Now that the character's momentum is fading, the company needs a successor — and the early candidates are not yet in the same weight class. TWINKLE TWINKLE's 580.6% growth sounds explosive, but from a small base; at 2.65 billion yuan it remains a supporting act. The World Cup tie-in and Labubu 4.0 launch, which JPMorgan flagged as catalysts, failed to reignite the cycle. That is the hallmark of a structural constraint: when growth depends on hitting another creative home run, the hit rate is the business model's ceiling.
The margin bridge tells the same story from the cost side. Gross margin in the first half was 69.7%, down slightly as raw-material costs rose and the mix shifted away from higher-margin overseas sales. Overseas operating margin, per JPMorgan, had already compressed 14 percentage points to 30%. The company is simultaneously moving from lightweight mall kiosks to flagship stores — New York's Times Square and SoHo locations, a Paris store near Galeries Lafayette, a flagship concept in Nanjing — which raises fixed costs before the revenue per square foot is proven. If sales keep falling while fixed costs rise, operating leverage works in reverse, and the 30% overseas margin is a floor, not a ceiling.
The Second-Order Effect: It's Not the Toys, It's the Multiple
The first-order consequence of a sales slowdown is lower revenue. The second-order consequence, and the one that matters more for shareholders, is what happens to the valuation multiple that was built on the assumption of endless growth. Pop Mart traded at a premium because investors extrapolated the Labubu curve into the future. Once that curve bends, the multiple compresses faster than earnings fall — which is why the stock is down 55% from its peak while revenue is merely slowing rather than collapsing. A company that grows 185% one year and contracts the next does not get a compounder's multiple, no matter how strong the brand.
This dynamic runs through the entire "emotional consumption" trade in China's consumer discretionary sector. Pop Mart was the poster child for the idea that young Chinese consumers would keep spending on small luxuries even as bigger-ticket categories weakened. If the poster child falters, the whole theme gets repriced. The transmission channel is clear: slowing same-store sales → inventory build → margin pressure from discounting and larger flagship stores → lower earnings → multiple compression. Each step amplifies the one before it, which is why a 37% growth-rate decline can produce a 55% equity drawdown.
There is also a cross-asset read. The Hong Kong market has been rewarding quality compounders with durable growth. Pop Mart's slide signals that even among quality names, the bar for "durable" has risen. Investors are no longer paying for growth that depends on a single character's virality; they want evidence of a repeatable hit machine. Until Pop Mart produces one, the multiple stays under pressure regardless of whether the base effect fades. The comparison that matters is not Pop Mart versus its own past, but Pop Mart versus other consumer names that have proven they can grow without a fad.
The Beanie Babies analogy, which has surfaced repeatedly since the shares peaked, is imperfect but instructive. Beanie Babies failed because Ty Inc. had no mechanism to retire characters — it kept producing the same dolls until scarcity, and therefore value, collapsed. Pop Mart's blind-box model is more sophisticated: it can retire designs, it has a membership base of repeat buyers, and it has already demonstrated one successful IP transition, from Molly to the current roster. The question is whether that transition capability is repeatable on demand or was a one-time stroke of creative luck. The answer determines whether this is 1999 or merely a rough patch.
The Counter-Thesis: This Is Just a Pause, Not a Peak
The strongest argument against the structural-bear case is straightforward: collectibles are inherently cyclical, and Pop Mart has survived cycles before. The company built its original business on Molly, then pivoted to a new roster of artist IPs. Bears said Molly was a fad; the company proved them wrong. The same playbook could work again. Labubu 4.0, the World Cup collaboration, and the global touring exhibition are not one-off stunts but part of a deliberate IP-refresh cadence. If the third-quarter weakness is mostly a base effect plus a temporary inventory digestion, the fourth quarter's projected 23% decline — an improvement from 37% — could mark the trough, and 2027 could bring a new character-driven upcycle.
Bulls also point to China's domestic strength. Revenue in China rose 47.3% in the first half, suggesting the home market is far from exhausted. The flagship-store strategy is designed to convert foot traffic into higher-margin, higher-engagement sales, and if those stores deliver, the overseas margin contraction could reverse as quickly as it appeared. The company's balance sheet supports the wait-and-see case: 12.44 billion yuan in cash and cash equivalents, no bank borrowings, and a gearing ratio of 24.9%. Pop Mart has the financial runway to outlast a cyclical downturn without diluting shareholders or fire-selling inventory.
This counter-thesis is credible, but it rests on a specific condition: that Pop Mart can launch a successor IP with Labubu-like traction within the next two quarters. That is the falsifying signal for the bear case. If the company reports two consecutive quarters of overseas revenue growth, or a new IP contributing more than 15% of revenue, the structural argument collapses and the cyclical view wins. Conversely, if overseas sales remain negative into 2027 and no new IP crosses that threshold, the peak-Labubu thesis is confirmed. The metric to watch is not the headline revenue number — that will be distorted by the base effect well into 2027 — but the sequential trend in overseas same-store sales and the revenue share of any single new IP.
What to Watch: Three Horizons
Short term (next quarter): The base case is a continued but narrowing decline, with fourth-quarter revenue down roughly 23% year over year as JPMorgan projects. The upside case is a faster stabilization if holiday-season Labubu 4.0 sell-through beats expectations and inventory normalizes without heavy discounting. The downside case is a deeper inventory correction that forces markdowns and pushes gross margin below the 69.7% level reported in the first half — a scenario that would likely take the stock below its 52-week low of HK$125.80.
Medium term (2027): The base case is low-to-mid single-digit revenue growth as the company digests the high base and the new IP pipeline ramps, with full-year adjusted net profit near JPMorgan's 9.34 billion yuan estimate. The upside case is a return to double-digit growth if a successor IP emerges and overseas margins recover toward their prior levels. The downside case is a full-year revenue contraction, which would force a further de-rating of the stock's multiple and could bring the price target cluster — currently anchored by Citi's HK$198 and JPMorgan's implied valuation — down toward the HK$130-150 range where the stock trades today.
Long term (structural): The question is whether Pop Mart is a hit-driven toy company or a repeatable IP platform. The base case is a hybrid: steady mid-single-digit growth from the core blind-box business, with occasional spikes from hit characters. That is a good business, but it does not deserve the multiple of a compounder. Three metrics separate the scenarios: overseas revenue growth (the early-warning system), inventory turnover (the margin-risk gauge), and the revenue share of any new IP beyond THE MONSTERS (the franchise test). A fourth, less discussed metric is resale-market pricing — if Labubu secondary prices stabilize, the demand curve has found a floor; if they keep sliding, the inventory overhang has further to run.
The central judgment: this is a cyclical downturn layered on a structural vulnerability. The high base will fade with time, but the dependence on Labubu will not fade on its own. Pop Mart's next act determines whether the stock's 55% decline was an overreaction or the first honest pricing of a fad-dependent franchise. The company has the cash, the brand, and the creative bench to write a different ending — but the market will not pay for potential forever, and the clock on that patience started ticking the quarter Labubu's curve bent.
Third-quarter figures cited here are analyst estimates from channel checks and third-party monitoring data; Pop Mart does not publish quarterly reports. Market data as of October 27, 2026.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
