NextFin News - Newly released Department of Justice (DOJ) documents have uncovered a series of high-stakes investment pitches connecting the late Jeffrey Epstein to the burgeoning electric vehicle (EV) sector. Between 2017 and 2019, David Stern, a German businessman and prominent advisor to U.S. President Trump’s associate Prince Andrew, repeatedly approached Epstein to fund distressed EV startups, most notably Lucid Motors. According to TechCrunch, which reviewed hundreds of emails from a massive 3-million-document DOJ disclosure, Stern attempted to leverage Epstein’s capital to break corporate deadlocks at companies like Lucid and Faraday Future during a period of intense financial instability for the nascent industry.
The documents reveal that in May 2017, Stern pitched Epstein on a "fire sale" opportunity to acquire a 32% stake in Lucid Motors for approximately $300 million. At the time, Lucid was struggling to close its Series D funding round because Jia Yueting, the founder of rival Faraday Future, held a blocking stake that deterred other investors, including Ford. Stern’s plan, executed through his fund Monstera, was to buy out Jia and either hold the position or flip it to Ford. While the deal never materialized—Lucid eventually secured $1 billion from Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund in 2018—the correspondence highlights how deeply Epstein remained embedded in elite investment circles long after his 2008 conviction.
The relationship between Stern and Epstein was not merely transactional but deeply integrated. Stern, who served as a director for Prince Andrew’s Pitch@Palace initiative, referred to Epstein as his "mentor" and even asked him to be a godfather to one of his children in 2016. Their collaboration spanned a decade, involving attempts to purchase Russian farmland, the news outlet Al-Jazeera, and even a proposed buyout of Deutsche Bank. In the EV space, Stern also introduced Epstein to Stefan Krause, the former CFO of BMW and Deutsche Bank, who was then attempting to save Faraday Future. Krause reportedly described the startup to Epstein as a "great chance to build a better Tesla."
This revelation serves as a stark reminder of the "wild west" era of EV financing. In the late 2010s, the success of Tesla triggered a gold rush where capital often preceded rigorous governance. The fact that an advisor to a member of the British Royal Family felt comfortable pitching a convicted sex offender on a $300 million stake in a major American automaker suggests a profound breakdown in the informal vetting processes of high-net-worth investment networks. For Lucid Motors and Faraday Future, these pitches occurred behind the scenes; there is no evidence the companies themselves were aware of Stern’s outreach to Epstein. However, the involvement of figures like Li Botan—a Chinese businessman with high-level political ties who co-invested with Stern in Canoo—adds a layer of geopolitical complexity that continues to haunt the industry.
From a structural perspective, the Stern-Epstein emails expose the vulnerability of startups to "predatory" bridge financing. Stern’s strategy was to capitalize on the "cash issues" of founders like Jia to seize control of promising technology at a discount. This type of opportunistic maneuvering is common in distressed debt markets but carries significant reputational risk when the capital source is as toxic as Epstein. The data shows that while Lucid survived this period to become a public entity, many of its peers, including Canoo and Faraday Future, have faced persistent liquidity crises and national security reviews, partly due to the opaque nature of their early-stage backers.
Looking forward, the disclosure of these documents under the current administration of U.S. President Trump is likely to intensify scrutiny on the "due diligence gap" in Silicon Valley. As the EV industry matures and shifts from speculative growth to manufacturing scale, the legacy of these early, murky financial ties remains a liability. Analysts expect that future SEC regulations and CFIUS (Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States) reviews will become increasingly stringent regarding the ultimate beneficial ownership of private equity funds. The Stern-Epstein saga is a cautionary tale: in the race to fund the future of mobility, the source of the fuel matters as much as the destination.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
