NextFin News - Private equity firms have found a new way to hand cash back to restless investors without selling a single company: structured equity deals that blend the features of stock and debt. The custom trades are spreading across the industry as buyout managers grapple with their biggest problem — a record backlog of roughly 33,500 companies they cannot sell or take public at the returns their investors expect. The question is whether the instrument is a bridge to a recovery in exits, or a way to manufacture liquidity while the real problem waits.
The Exit Logjam That Will Not Clear on Its Own
The scale of the bind is unusual even by the standards of a cyclical downturn. Global buyout firms amassed close to $4 trillion in assets, snapping up companies at high valuations when interest rates were low. Now, with borrowing costs higher, the exit doors the model depends on have narrowed. As of June 30, 2026, private equity firms held 33,575 unsold companies in their portfolios, up from 32,451 at the end of 2025 and more than double the 15,923 held a decade earlier, according to industry data. For the third consecutive year, firms are stuck with a rapidly growing pile of assets they cannot monetize at target returns.
The cash drought for investors has become structural. Distributions as a percentage of net asset value have now held below 15% for four consecutive years — an industry record — and sat at roughly 14%, a level not seen since the 2008-09 global financial crisis, Bain & Company's 2026 Global Private Equity Report found. McKinsey's Global Private Markets Report 2026 put the five-year rolling distribution-to-paid-in ratio as a share of total private equity assets under management at its lowest recorded level, about 10%, in June 2025. Distributions as a share of AUM fell to approximately 6% in the six months ended June 2025, eight percentage points below the 2015-2024 average of 14%.
The pressure is visible in the capital sitting idle. Buyout dry powder stands near $1.3 trillion, and more than 40% of it has been available for deployment for two years or more — 15 percentage points above the five-year average, per McKinsey. Much of it was raised in the 2022-23 fund vintages, meaning the clock on the industry's traditional five-to-seven-year holding period is already ticking loudly. Bain places the average holding period for assets at exit at around seven years and estimates the industry is carrying roughly 32,000 unsold companies worth $3.8 trillion.
There is a reason this matters beyond fund marketing. Private equity's social contract with pension funds, endowments and sovereign wealth funds is simple: pay steep fees for market-beating returns delivered in cash. When distributions stall, the contract frays. "Private equity is stuck because those companies have failed to fulfill their value promise," said Andrew Milgram, managing partner and chief investment officer at Marblegate Asset Management.
How Structured Equity Works, and Why It Is Spreading Now
Structured equity sits between senior debt and common equity in a company's capital stack. Rather than a single instrument, it is an umbrella term for a range of securities designed to give investors preferential rights, downside protection, or both, according to a practical guide from law firm White & Case. In practice, a private markets giant such as Apollo Global Management or Bain provides a portfolio company with capital that carries equity-like upside but is contractually senior to the sponsor's own stake — often with a fixed coupon, preferred dividends, or a put option that forces cash payments back to the fund.
Those payments are the point. Because distributions to paid-in capital — DPI, the ratio of cumulative cash returned to investors to the capital they have contributed — has quietly become the metric that decides which managers can raise their next fund, a structured-equity deal lets a general partner book a distribution without finding a buyer for the underlying business. The trade is custom, negotiated one sponsor and one asset at a time, and it boosts the fund's headline liquidity number while the asset stays on the books.
The metric shift is real. In a 2026 survey of 300 institutional investors, McKinsey found DPI now ties with the multiple of invested capital for the second-most-important metric shaping allocation decisions, with the internal rate of return still in the lead. PwC's US deals midyear outlook put it more bluntly: top-DPI performers raised capital quickly, while managers with weak realization faced extended timelines, smaller targets and skeptical investment committees. In the first half of 2026, aggregate dollars raised actually increased 9% relative to the first half of 2025 — but the money flowed to firms that could demonstrate cash returns.
Apollo's Hybrid Value business, which targets loan-to-value ranges of 50% to 80%, describes the instrument as "less dilutive than [issuing more] common equity" for the business owner, while noting that "our funds' equity may be structurally senior to the remaining equity." Jason Scheir, head of Apollo's Hybrid Value unit, said "creativity and collaboration are core to everything we do." In Apollo's January 2026 outlook, partners David Sambur, Matt Nord and Antoine Munfakh argued the industry's way forward is "a return to the roots of the asset class: disciplined buying, hands-on operational improvement and clear, repeatable pathways to liquidity." Apollo said in July that "in 2026, we are seeing that the investing landscape just needs more of these solutions."
The market for such hybrid capital is growing fast. Preferred equity used inside rated fund-finance structures — collateralized fund obligations, collateralized loan obligations and rated-note funds — reached an estimated $20 billion to $25 billion in 2025, with some projections of $30 billion for 2026, law firm Dechert reported in August.
Why This Is Not Just a Dividend Recapitalization
The private equity playbook already contains a familiar liquidity tool: the dividend recapitalization, in which a portfolio company borrows more and pays a special dividend to its sponsor. Structured equity is a cousin, but with a critical distinction. A dividend recap loads senior or subordinated debt onto the company and pays the sponsor immediately; structured equity typically sits outside the senior debt layer and can be structured so the fund receives cash while the portfolio company's reported leverage looks less stressed. It is financial engineering calibrated for an era when leverage ratios and covenant headroom are already tight.
The distinction matters because the industry's balance sheets are not what they were in the cheap-money years. With purchase multiples and financing costs simultaneously elevated, Bain's midyear 2026 report described a "triple-shock" that has braked the industry's latest revival, with its deal-cost index at a record high. US deal volume in the first half of 2026 fell 34% from a year earlier, even as average deal size rose nearly fourfold, as capital concentrated in higher-conviction megadeals, according to PwC. McKinsey separately calculated that the average buyout deal size rose to just above $910 million in 2025 from just over $610 million in 2024, as the count of buyouts of all sizes fell 5% while deals above $500 million rose 20%. The middle of the market — where most PE-owned companies live — is precisely where liquidity is thinnest.
That is the gap structured equity is designed to fill. When a portfolio company cannot refinance cleanly, cannot be sold at target returns, and is not yet broken enough to warrant a write-down, a hybrid instrument gives the sponsor cash today in exchange for a slice of tomorrow's recovery. For the fund's DPI line, today is what counts.
The Counter-Thesis: Flexibility, Not Just Engineering
Defenders of structured equity argue it is being caricatured as a gimmick. Hybrid capital can be genuinely useful for a portfolio company caught between refinancing walls — less dilutive than a common-equity raise, less rigid than senior bank debt, and capable of carrying a business through a patch of weak cash flow without forcing a fire sale. Apollo's own messaging frames the product as a response to real demand rather than regulatory arbitrage.
There is also a legitimate second-best-exit argument. Selling a company at a distressed price destroys value for everyone; holding an asset with a structured-equity backstop can preserve optionality until the IPO or trade-sale window reopens. For limited partners, a modest distribution today may be preferable to a larger, uncertain one several years from now — particularly for pension funds and endowments that have been paying steep fees for market-beating returns they have not seen in cash. In that framing, structured equity is not a substitute for an exit; it is a mechanism for surviving until one is possible.
The strongest version of the defense still concedes the core problem, however: structured equity manages the symptom, not the disease. It does not create an exit; it monetizes patience. And patience, in a fund with a finite life and an aging book of assets, is a depleting resource. The instrument works only if the underlying business eventually recovers enough value to satisfy the structured claim and still leave something for the sponsor's equity — the very equity whose returns the DPI boost is meant to showcase.
The Risk: Kicking the Reckoning Down the Road
The danger is that structured equity becomes a substitute for the hard work of exiting. Every dollar of distribution booked through a hybrid deal is a dollar that will not come from a real sale — and, because the structured instrument typically sits ahead of the sponsor's equity in the payout line, a dollar that reduces the residual value available to LPs when the asset finally does sell. The liquidity is real for the fund today; the cost is deferred and, in many cases, buried inside the portfolio company's capital structure.
The mechanism also concentrates risk in the assets least able to bear it. Sponsors are most likely to reach for structured equity when a portfolio company cannot refinance cleanly and cannot be sold at target returns — precisely the situations where downside protection matters most. If those companies then stumble, the structured instrument's seniority means losses cascade to the fund's own equity first, compressing the very returns the DPI boost was meant to showcase. A workaround that protects reported liquidity while eroding economic value is a trade investors may not notice until it is too late.
There is a precedent for skepticism. The private equity industry has a long history of liquidity tools that looked innovative at launch and obvious in hindsight — from payment-in-kind toggle notes in the 2000s to the continuation vehicles that became the exit market of last resort in the 2020s. Each solved a real problem for sponsors at a specific moment. Each also pushed the moment of truth further into the future.
The Other Escape Routes, and Why They Are Not Enough
The industry does have alternatives. GP-led secondary transactions, most of them continuation vehicles, more than tripled in value over five years, rising from $35 billion in 2020 to $115 billion in 2025, and now account for an estimated 14% of sponsor-backed exits; limited partners expect that share to reach 20%, according to Jefferies. Total secondaries volume hit a record $240 billion in 2025, up 48% from the prior year. Yet even a booming secondaries market is small against the backlog — roughly 5% of global buyout assets under management, by one estimate.
The clean fix remains a reopening of the IPO and merger markets. Deal activity has shown signs of life — 2025 saw the largest private equity take-private in history, a $55 billion buyout of Electronic Arts by a syndicate of firms, and PE-backed exit value surged more than 40% — but the near-term picture is mixed. Buyout deal count across all sizes fell 5% in 2025 even as large deals dominated, and first-half 2026 data shows volume still contracting while capital concentrates at the top. A recovery led by megadeals does little for the thousands of middle-market assets sitting in PE portfolios.
What Comes Next: Three Signals to Watch
Three signals will tell investors whether structured equity is a bridge or a crutch. First, whether the backlog of unsold companies begins to shrink rather than grow — a sustained quarterly decline in the unsold-company count would signal that exits, not engineering, are doing the work. Second, whether default or restructuring rates among structured-equity-backed portfolio companies run materially higher than traditional buyouts; a gap exceeding roughly twice the traditional rate within 12 to 18 months would indicate the instrument is being used to prop up weaker assets. Third, whether DPI recovers through actual sales rather than custom trades — if distributions as a share of NAV stay stuck near 14% while structured-equity volume climbs, the industry is substituting one for the other.
The scenarios split by horizon. In the short term — the next two to four quarters — structured equity is likely to keep expanding, because the incentives are aligned: GPs need DPI to raise funds, LPs need cash, and no one wants to sell at distressed prices. In the medium term, the test is whether the exit window actually opens; if interest rates drift lower and public markets stay receptive, the backlog could begin to clear and structured equity would fade back into a niche tool. In the long term, the structural question is whether the industry's five-to-seven-year hold model can survive an era of higher rates and higher entry multiples, or whether funds will need permanently longer lives and more flexible liquidity tools baked in from inception.
The base case is a hybrid outcome: structured equity becomes a permanent, larger part of the PE toolkit without ever resolving the exit backlog, which clears only slowly as rates normalize and megadeals keep absorbing the best assets. The upside case is a genuine exit recovery that makes the instrument largely redundant. The downside case is a credit wobble in which the assets propped up by hybrid capital turn out to be the weakest, and the seniority that protected structured investors simply reroutes losses to the funds themselves.
"Private equity is stuck because those companies have failed to fulfill their value promise," said Andrew Milgram, managing partner and chief investment officer at Marblegate Asset Management.
The central judgment: structured equity is a clever answer to a question private equity would rather not be asked. It keeps distributions flowing and funds raiseable in a market that has forgotten how to exit — but it is a workaround, not a resolution. The industry's $4 trillion of assets will eventually need real buyers, and no amount of hybrid capital changes that arithmetic. Private equity spent decades teaching companies how to leverage up and sell high. Now the lesson is coming due — and structured equity is the art of looking liquid while you figure out how to pay it.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
