NextFin News - Robinhood Markets is in talks to add Crypto.com's prediction-market contracts to its platform, a distribution pact that would hand the crypto exchange access to more than 28 million funded customers while pushing Robinhood into a sharper confrontation with Kalshi, the CFTC-licensed exchange that has been its primary supplier since March 2025. The talks, reported by people familiar with the matter, carry no guarantee of a deal and no disclosed terms - but they expose the central tension in a prediction-markets industry that just crossed $44 billion in monthly volume: the platforms that own the customers are no longer content to rent their inventory.
The timing is the story. In the second quarter of 2026, prediction markets generated $156 million for Robinhood, more than ten times the year-earlier figure and, for the first time, ahead of its crypto-trading revenue, which fell 38 percent to $100 million. Event contracts have become the growth engine of a brokerage once defined by commission-free stock trading. What Robinhood does with that engine - build it itself, or wholesale it from the highest bidder - is now the question that will determine who captures the next leg of a market that Wall Street's Bernstein expects to reach $1 trillion in annual volume by 2030.
The Deal on the Table: Distribution as the New Battleground
The reported arrangement is straightforward in structure and significant in consequence: Crypto.com's yes-or-no event contracts would appear inside Robinhood's prediction hub, letting customers place bets on sports, politics, economics, and entertainment outcomes without leaving the app. For Crypto.com, the prize is distribution at scale. Its own consumer prediction brand, OG, launched on February 3, 2026, but Robinhood brings a user base that already includes more than a million prediction-market traders - a pool larger than most standalone prediction platforms can attract on their own.
Crypto.com has been pursuing exactly this strategy for months. It secured a CFTC-registered exchange and clearinghouse license in September 2025 through Crypto.com | Derivatives North America, then signed a series of distribution agreements rather than betting everything on its own app: DraftKings on February 6, 2026, FanDuel Predicts on June 10, 2026, and a partnership with Trump Media's Truth Social announced in October 2025. The pattern is deliberate. Prediction markets are a volume business with fixed infrastructure costs; the exchange that supplies the most contracts to the most front-ends captures the spread regardless of whose logo the customer sees.
But the Truth Social episode is a cautionary note. In August 2026, Trump Media scaled back plans to embed a native prediction engine, opting instead for a marketing arrangement that steers users to OG.com. The retreat did not reflect a failure of demand - it reflected the difficulty of building market infrastructure inside a social platform. For Crypto.com, the lesson is that distribution partnerships are both its growth vector and its vulnerability: they can be renegotiated, scaled back, or abandoned by partners with their own agendas.
For Robinhood, the calculus runs the other way. Adding Crypto.com contracts expands the menu for customers - more sports props, more political markets, more entertainment outcomes - while giving the brokerage leverage over its existing supplier. A broker with multiple liquidity sources can route order flow to the exchange offering the best terms, the deepest markets, or the fastest settlement. That is the quiet power move underneath the headline.
The Contradiction Inside Robinhood: Building Rothera While Renting Inventory
Here is where the story gets interesting, and where most coverage stops too early. In January 2026, Robinhood and Susquehanna International Group took a controlling stake in a CFTC-licensed exchange formerly known as MIAXdx and rebranded it Rothera. Robinhood launched it in June 2026, routing World Cup contracts through it from day one. By the end of that month, Rothera had processed $2 billion in notional volume and captured a 7 percent share of the U.S. prediction market, according to Bank of America - roughly double what Kalshi's entire platform was handling monthly before the Super Bowl.
In the second quarter, Rothera contributed $17 million of Robinhood's $156 million in event-contract revenue and handled 2.1 billion of the 13.6 billion contracts traded on the platform. That is about 11 percent of revenue and 15 percent of volume - meaningful for an exchange barely a month old, but still a minority share. The rest flowed through Kalshi and other connected venues.
So Robinhood is doing two things that look contradictory: building its own exchange to internalize the economics of event contracts, while simultaneously adding another third-party supplier. The resolution is that these are not contradictory at all. They are two legs of the same strategy - own the plumbing where it matters, rent the inventory where it doesn't.
Rothera is the long-term play. Every contract routed through an exchange Robinhood controls keeps the clearing fees, the data fees, and the market-making economics inside the company. Crypto.com contracts are the short-term play: they fill gaps in the product menu today, keep customers from defecting to Kalshi's own app or Polymarket, and give Robinhood negotiating leverage against Kalshi tomorrow. A broker that can credibly threaten to shift volume is a broker that gets better pricing.
The risk is that the short-term play becomes a habit. If Robinhood keeps routing the majority of its volume to third parties - Kalshi today, Crypto.com tomorrow - then Rothera remains a strategic hedge rather than a profit center, and Robinhood's prediction business stays closer to distribution aggregation than to exchange ownership. The falsifying signal is concrete: if Rothera's share of Robinhood's event-contract revenue does not climb above 50 percent within four quarters, the "build your own exchange" narrative is overstated, and this deal is simply Robinhood optimizing its supplier portfolio.
Kalshi's Dilemma: The Supplier That Made the Market
No party is more exposed to this shift than Kalshi. The CFTC-licensed exchange launched Robinhood's prediction hub in March 2025, effectively creating the retail prediction market as a mainstream product. At the start, Robinhood drove more than half of Kalshi's volume; by April 2026, that share had fallen to roughly 22 percent as Kalshi diversified its distribution. Even so, Robinhood remains one of Kalshi's largest channels, and Kalshi's chief executive, Tarek Mansour, said in June that he considers Robinhood a leading competitor. That is an unusual position for a supplier: your largest customer is also your most dangerous rival.
The numbers show why Kalshi can still afford to be confident. Kalshi has overtaken Polymarket as the industry leader, with $39.5 billion in total notional volume compared with Polymarket's $29.2 billion, and it is valued at $22 billion after a May 2026 funding round. In June 2026 alone, Kalshi processed $31.5 billion in monthly volume, up 87 percent from May, while Polymarket handled $13.3 billion. Combined monthly volume across the two platforms reached $44.8 billion - more than triple the roughly $14 billion average monthly handle of all legal U.S. sportsbooks in 2025, according to a Pew Research Center analysis.
But scale is not the same as security. Kalshi's growth has been built on embedding its markets into retail front-ends - Robinhood first and foremost. If those front-ends migrate volume to their own exchanges, Kalshi becomes a wholesale utility: large, regulated, and slowly commoditized. The Crypto.com talks are a signal that the migration is real and accelerating. Robinhood already routes World Cup and sports-parlay volume through Rothera; sports contracts account for roughly 80 percent of Kalshi's volume, according to Pew. Losing that category to an in-house exchange would cut to the core of Kalshi's business.
Kalshi's defense is regulation and breadth. It was the first CFTC-licensed prediction market in the United States, launched in 2021, and it offers the widest legal footprint and the deepest event menu in the industry. Polymarket, by contrast, is stronger in international and crypto-native markets but faces a more uncertain U.S. regulatory path. For a regulated broker like Robinhood, Kalshi remains the safest large-scale supplier - which is why the Crypto.com deal, if it happens, is more likely to supplement than to replace Kalshi in the near term.
The Second-Order Trade: Prediction Markets Are Eating Crypto's Lunch
The most underappreciated part of this story is what it says about Robinhood's business model. For years, Robinhood's identity was "the crypto-friendly broker" - the app that brought retail traders into bitcoin and dogecoins. In the second quarter of 2026, that identity flipped. Prediction markets generated $156 million against crypto's $100 million, and event-contract volume hit a record 13.6 billion contracts, with 6.4 billion of those traded in June alone during the World Cup.
This is not a one-quarter anomaly. In an April 2026 note, Bernstein raised its Robinhood price target to $160 from $130 and forecast prediction-market revenue of roughly $586 million in 2026 and $1.7 billion by 2028 - at which point, the firm argues, prediction markets will overtake crypto trading as Robinhood's largest revenue line. The thesis is that a generation of retail traders is migrating from directional crypto bets to event-based speculation: binary outcomes with defined risk, regulated settlement, and no overnight funding exposure.
The second-order implication is that Robinhood's valuation is being re-rated on a different earnings engine. A crypto broker trades on crypto volumes, which are volatile and tied to asset prices. A prediction-market platform trades on event volume, which is driven by the calendar - elections, Fed meetings, sports seasons - and is therefore more predictable and more defensible. If Bernstein is right, the market is still pricing Robinhood as a crypto-adjacent broker rather than as the largest distribution node in a structural growth market.
"The business is firing on all cylinders," Shiv Verma, Robinhood's chief financial officer, said in the company's July 29 earnings release. "We delivered record revenues and drove new highs across equity, option, and event contract volumes, as we continue to win market share."
Total net revenue rose 32 percent year-over-year to $1.31 billion in the second quarter, with transaction-based revenue up 44 percent to $776 million. Options contributed $342 million, up 29 percent, and equities added $129 million, up 95 percent. Prediction markets were the fastest-growing line, but they were not alone - Robinhood's diversification into thirteen business lines is the broader story, and event contracts are simply the newest and fastest of them.
The Regulatory Overhang: Seventeen States Are Watching
None of this growth is happening in a legal vacuum. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission and six states are in litigation over who has jurisdiction to regulate event contracts, and seventeen states in total are challenging companies with prediction markets - including Kalshi, Polymarket, Coinbase, and Robinhood. One state has moved to ban them entirely.
The regulatory question is existential for the distribution model. If event contracts are classified as gambling rather than as derivatives, then embedding them in a brokerage app becomes far more complicated, and the interstate licensing stack that Crypto.com and Kalshi have built becomes a moat rather than an obstacle. If they remain under CFTC oversight, the large regulated exchanges keep their advantage, and the barrier to entry stays high.
That is why the CFTC-registered status of both Crypto.com | Derivatives North America and Rothera matters more than the headlines suggest. In a contested regulatory environment, the licensed players are not just compliant - they are the only ones who can scale. A Robinhood-Crypto.com deal would reinforce that consolidation, pushing smaller, unlicensed prediction platforms further to the fringe.
The Bottom Line: Who Wins, Who Loses, and What to Watch
If the deal closes, the winners are clear. Crypto.com gains distribution without customer-acquisition cost, monetizing infrastructure it has already built. Robinhood gains a broader product menu and leverage over Kalshi. Customers gain more markets to trade. The exposed party is Kalshi, which faces the slow erosion of its privileged position as the default supplier to the largest retail prediction audience in the United States.
But the deal is not certain, and even if it closes, it will not reshape the industry overnight. Prediction markets are still a fraction of the sports-betting and crypto-trading markets they are encroaching on. The structural shift - retail speculation moving into regulated event contracts - is real and durable. The individual partnerships that execute it are tactical, reversible, and subject to renegotiation, as the Truth Social retreat demonstrated.
Short term, watch for an announcement from either company, and for any movement in HOOD shares, which traded around $122 in early September after rising roughly 32 percent over the prior month. Medium term, watch Rothera's share of Robinhood's event revenue - the single best indicator of whether Robinhood is building an exchange or just aggregating suppliers. Long term, watch the CFTC litigation: a ruling that reclassifies event contracts as gambling would reset the entire competitive landscape.
The base case is that Robinhood adds Crypto.com contracts while continuing to route the majority of volume through Kalshi and Rothera - a multi-supplier model that maximizes choice and minimizes dependency. The upside case is that Rothera scales faster than expected, internalizing most of the economics and turning Robinhood into a genuine exchange operator. The downside case is that regulatory pressure slows the entire category, or that Crypto.com's distribution-first model proves less profitable than building an owned consumer brand.
Robinhood is not just adding a new product line. It is deciding what kind of company it becomes: a broker that rents markets, or an exchange that owns them. The Crypto.com talks are the latest vote for having it both ways - and in a market this young, that ambiguity may be exactly the point.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
