NextFin News - Morgan Stanley turned bullish on Robinhood Markets Inc. on Monday, upgrading the online brokerage to overweight from underweight and lifting its price target to $150 from $124, after the firm's prediction-markets business produced $156 million of revenue in the second quarter from roughly 2 million users. The analyst, Michael Cyprys, called the result a "proof point" that Robinhood can keep expanding revenue by selling more products to the customers it already has.
The upgrade sent Robinhood shares up 2.4% in premarket trading. The stock, which closed around $104 last week, has climbed about 64% from its 52-week low of $63.52 hit in March, though it remains roughly 7% lower for the year and about 32% below its 52-week high of $153.86. The move reframes the debate around the brokerage: the question is no longer whether event contracts are a novelty, but whether they are the first evidence of a structural shift in how a retail trading app monetizes its installed base.
The Numbers Behind the Upgrade
Robinhood's second-quarter report, released in early August, showed event contracts exploding from roughly $10 million of quarterly revenue a year earlier to $156 million, a more than tenfold increase. The number of event contracts traded rose more than tenfold to a record 13.6 billion. Event contracts moved from a rounding error to about 20% of the company's $776 million of transaction-based revenue, second only to options, which contributed $342 million. Equities added $129 million, up 95% year over year.
Total revenue climbed 32% year over year to $1.31 billion, ahead of the $1.29 billion consensus estimate. Funded customers grew 7% to 28.4 million, Robinhood Gold subscribers rose 39% to a record 4.8 million, and net deposits reached $21.7 billion. Total platform assets increased 32% to $369 billion. The company said 13 business lines have now reached at least $100 million in annualized revenue, with its Legend tier and credit card joining the group during the quarter.
For Morgan Stanley, the prediction-market print mattered less as a standalone revenue line than as evidence of cross-selling. Cyprys raised his 2026-to-2028 earnings estimates by 12% to 15% and pointed to assets per customer up 23% year over year, with Gold users holding about 4.2 times the average customer's assets under custody.
"We see increasing evidence that broader product capabilities are improving the economics of HOOD's installed customer base, supporting more assets per customer, more activity per customer and greater economics captured per activity," Cyprys wrote in a note.
How Prediction Markets Actually Make Money
Event contracts are binary wagers on real-world outcomes - whether a candidate wins an election, which team lifts the World Cup, whether the Federal Reserve cuts rates at its next meeting. A customer buys a "yes" or "no" share, typically priced between zero and one dollar, and the contract settles at one dollar if the prediction is correct and zero if it is not. The spread between what the platform collects and what it pays out is the revenue.
The unit economics are what caught Morgan Stanley's attention. At $156 million of revenue on 13.6 billion contracts, Robinhood captured roughly 1.15 cents per contract. That fee sits below Kalshi's maximum of 2 cents per contract and in line with ForecastEx, the CME-owned venue. Robinhood's advantage is not pricing power; it is that it does not have to pay to acquire the person placing the bet. A standalone prediction platform must spend marketing dollars to draw every new user. Robinhood simply surfaces event contracts to 28 million funded accounts that are already in the app, already verified, and already funded.
The revenue per user math is striking. $156 million from roughly 2 million users works out to about $78 of annualized revenue per prediction-market customer - comparable to, and in some cases above, what the average Robinhood account generates from trading commissions and payment for order flow. And those users are not one-product customers. Management said on the second-quarter earnings call that prediction-market users are more likely to hold a retirement account with Robinhood, and that every vector - banking, prediction markets, credit card - tends to pull customers into others.
Why the Installed Base Is the Real Story
The mechanism Morgan Stanley is betting on is straightforward: Robinhood no longer needs to win new customers at high cost to grow. It has roughly 28 million funded accounts, and each new product it ships - banking, prediction markets, a credit card, retirement accounts - can be distributed to that base at near-zero marginal acquisition cost. The revenue math changes when the same customer buys several products instead of one.
That is a different business from the Robinhood of 2021, when revenue rose and fell with meme-stock mania and crypto volatility. The company's crypto revenue fell 38% in the second quarter, a reminder that any single product can cool quickly. But the platform now has enough lines that one cooling product does not sink the quarter: options grew 29%, equities 95%, net interest income 9% to $389 million, and other revenue - including Gold subscriptions and Trump Account service fees - rose 54% to $143 million.
The Gold subscription illustrates the multiplier. At 4.8 million subscribers, Gold is not just a monthly fee; it is a flag identifying the platform's most engaged users, who hold roughly 4.2 times the assets of the average customer. A prediction-market user who also holds a retirement account and uses the credit card is far more valuable, and far less likely to leave, than a free-equity trader who opens an account for one stock and closes it a month later. Retention is the quiet driver of the bull case: a customer with three products has three reasons to stay.
What the Market Is Paying for the Story
The valuation math shows why Morgan Stanley moved when it did. At around $104 a share, Robinhood trades at roughly 47 times trailing earnings on a market capitalization near $94 billion. That is not a cheap multiple for a brokerage, and it leaves little room for execution mistakes. The premium is the market pricing in continued product velocity - the belief that each new line will repeat the event-contract pattern of rapid adoption and high-margin revenue.
Morgan Stanley's $150 target implies the bank sees that premium as justified, or even still too conservative. By raising its 2026-to-2028 earnings estimates by 12% to 15% and projecting 23% compound annual revenue growth through 2028 toward about $8 billion, the bank is effectively arguing that the current price discounts only part of the product pipeline. The 43% upside to the target is not a multiple expansion bet; it is an earnings-revision bet.
The risk in that arithmetic is concentration of expectations. With the average analyst target compiled by FactSet near $126, Morgan Stanley is now the clear bull on the Street. If event-contract volume steps down after the World Cup or if regulation tightens, the multiple has further to fall than a stock trading closer to the consensus target. A premium valuation rewards execution but punishes disappointment more severely.
Cyclical Spike or Structural Pillar?
The central question for investors is whether prediction-market revenue is cyclical - a surge tied to the 2024 election and the 2026 World Cup that will mean-revert - or structural, a new product category that compounds. The answer is both, operating on different time horizons, and confusing the two is the easiest way to misread the stock.
On the cyclical leg, event volume is undeniably event-driven. Bernstein analyst Chhugani estimates Robinhood's prediction-market revenue will rise from about $150 million in 2025 to $586 million in 2026, nearly a fourfold jump in a single year. Much of that growth rides on the 2026 FIFA World Cup, hosted in North America, and the post-election trading environment. When the tournament ends and the political calendar quiets, quarterly contract volumes will almost certainly step down from their peak. That is the mean-reversion risk, and it is real.
On the structural leg, the category itself is not reverting. Industry estimates suggest total prediction-market notional volume expanded more than tenfold from 2024 levels, reaching roughly $13 billion a month by late 2025. Bernstein projects industry volume will quadruple to $240 billion in 2026 from $51 billion in 2025 and reach $1 trillion annually by 2030. Kalshi closed a Series F funding round in May 2026 at a $22 billion valuation, backed by firms including Morgan Stanley itself. A market attracting that kind of institutional capital is not a fad; it is a newly legalized asset class.
The structural case is reinforced by Robinhood's control of distribution. One 2026 market study found Kalshi and Polymarket jointly accounting for about 94% of branded demand in the U.S., but Robinhood was the fastest-growing challenger, up more than 983% year over year. Robinhood does not need to win the branded-demand war. It needs to keep event contracts inside its own app, where it already sits in 28 million pockets. That is a distribution advantage standalone prediction platforms cannot match, and it is why the brokerage, not the pure-play prediction exchange, may capture the most durable value.
The second-order implication is that prediction markets are a Trojan horse for something larger. A customer who becomes comfortable betting on binary outcomes is a customer who has been trained to trade derivatives-like instruments inside a brokerage app. That lowers the barrier to options, futures, and structured products - the higher-margin businesses that sit at the top of the retail-brokerage value chain. The event contract is not the end product; it is the on-ramp.
The Counter-Thesis: What Could Break the Bull Case
The strongest argument against Morgan Stanley's view is that event-contract revenue is a high-margin but fickle product that can cannibalize other trading lines and depends on a regulatory environment that could tighten. Crypto revenue, once Robinhood's growth engine, fell 38% in the second quarter, showing how quickly a hot product can cool. If prediction markets follow the same path, today's 10x growth rate becomes next year's comparison problem.
Regulatory risk is real and already playing out. New York Attorney General Letitia James sued Coinbase and Gemini in April 2026, alleging their prediction platforms operate illegal gambling in the state, and later filed suit against Kalshi itself. Massachusetts obtained an injunction restricting Kalshi's sports contracts, and more than 20 state-level enforcement actions are pending nationwide, with no final resolution. Robinhood has not been named in those cases, but the legal map is fragmented, and a shift in federal enforcement could narrow the product set or raise compliance costs.
Robinhood has partly insulated itself by routing some contracts through Rothera, the prediction exchange it backs in a joint venture with Susquehanna International Group, where fees are capped at 1 cent per contract. But a joint venture with an exchange does not make the underlying product immune to a change in enforcement. Competition is also intensifying: Coinbase added Kalshi event contracts to its app in January 2026, and FanDuel's sportsbook alone has more than 12 million users, giving rivals funded accounts where sports bettors already sit.
The falsifying signal is specific: if Robinhood's event-contract revenue falls below $100 million for two consecutive quarters after the World Cup concludes, while total transaction-revenue growth decelerates below 20% year over year, the structural thesis is wrong and the revenue is cyclical event noise. Investors should watch the third- and fourth-quarter 2026 prints for exactly that pattern.
What Comes Next
In the short term, the stock will track event volume through the remainder of 2026 and any regulatory headlines from Washington. A strong World Cup quarter could push HOOD toward Morgan Stanley's $150 target, which implies 43% upside from the last close near $104. The average analyst target compiled by FactSet sits near $126, leaving Morgan Stanley as the clear bull on the Street.
Over the medium term, the test is retention: whether prediction-market users stay on the platform and add a second and third product after the event that brought them in passes. Over the long term, the question is whether Robinhood becomes a multi-product financial super-app whose valuation rests on lifetime customer value, or remains a trading app whose revenue spikes with the news cycle.
The base case is that prediction markets settle into a steady run rate measured in billions of contracts rather than peak event volume, contributing several hundred million dollars of annual revenue alongside options, Gold, banking, and credit. The upside case is that cross-adoption accelerates and Robinhood captures a durable share of a market that Bernstein sees reaching $1 trillion in annual volume. The downside case is a regulatory setback or a volume collapse that leaves event contracts as a profitable but small sideline.
Morgan Stanley's upgrade is not a bet that prediction markets will grow forever at a 10x rate. It is a bet that they have proven Robinhood can teach an old customer base new tricks - and that the next product will be easier to sell than the last one. If Cyprys is right, the roughly 2 million prediction-market users are not the revenue story; they are the distribution proof.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
