NextFin

Singapore Firm X-Press Feeders Refuses to Pay $1 Billion Sri Lankan Pollution Damages

Summarized by NextFin AI
  • X-Press Feeders has refused to pay the US$1 billion damages ordered by Sri Lanka's Supreme Court for the environmental pollution caused by the sinking of the MV X-Press Pearl.
  • The incident led to severe pollution along an 80-kilometre stretch of coastline, resulting in a fishing ban for months.
  • CEO Shmuel Yoskovitz warned that the court's ruling undermines the limitation of liability principle, which could increase insurance premiums and affect consumers.
  • The Sri Lankan government is considering further actions following X-Press Feeders' refusal, while the long-term environmental impact is still under study.

NextFin news, Singapore shipping company X-Press Feeders declared on Tuesday, September 23, 2025, that it will refuse to pay the US$1 billion in damages ordered by Sri Lanka's Supreme Court for the environmental pollution caused by the sinking of its vessel, MV X-Press Pearl, off Colombo Port in June 2021.

The MV X-Press Pearl caught fire, reportedly due to a nitric acid leak, and sank after nearly two weeks of burning. The ship was carrying 81 containers of hazardous materials, including acids and lead ingots, along with hundreds of tonnes of plastic pellets. The incident resulted in severe pollution along an 80-kilometre stretch of Sri Lanka's western coastline, leading to a fishing ban for months.

X-Press Feeders' Chief Executive Shmuel Yoskovitz told AFP that paying the court-ordered damages would have "wide-ranging implications on global shipping" and could "set a dangerous precedent." He emphasized that maritime trade relies on the limitation of liability, which the court's ruling undermines. Yoskovitz also expressed concern that the absence of liability limits could increase insurance premiums, ultimately affecting consumers.

The Sri Lankan Supreme Court's July ruling ordered the company to pay an "initial" US$1 billion within a year, with the first installment of US$250 million due by Tuesday, September 23, 2025. The court also mandated the company to make further payments as directed in the future. Yoskovitz criticized the open-ended nature of the penalty, describing it as a "hanging guillotine" that makes business operations impossible.

Since the disaster, X-Press Feeders has spent approximately US$170 million on wreck removal, seabed and beach cleanup, and compensation for affected fishermen. The company stated it is willing to pay more but insists on settling under established marine conventions with a full and final amount.

Sri Lanka's government said it will consult its chief prosecutor on possible actions following the refusal. Government spokesman and media minister Nalinda Jayatissa said, "We will be guided by the advice of the attorney general on what further steps to take." The United Nations office in Colombo supported the court's ruling, highlighting the "polluter pays" principle enshrined in global agreements, including the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.

The Supreme Court has scheduled a hearing on Thursday, September 25, 2025, to discuss the implementation of its decision. The court's 361-page judgment also instructed police and the state prosecutor to initiate criminal proceedings for non-compliance if the parties are present in Sri Lanka.

Legal complexities remain, as X-Press Feeders obtained a limitation of liability order from London's Admiralty Court in July 2023, capping liability at 19 million pounds (approximately US$25 million), which Sri Lanka has challenged. Additionally, Sri Lanka filed a lawsuit against the ship's owners in the Singapore International Commercial Court, currently stayed pending the London case, with a pre-trial hearing expected in May 2026.

The incident's long-term environmental impact is still under study. Environmental advocates urge further research to assess the full extent of damage to Sri Lanka's marine ecosystems. Hemantha Withanage from the Centre for Environmental Justice noted that while visible plastic pollution has been cleaned, the effects will persist for years.

The ship's Russian captain, Vitaly Tyutkalo, has been banned from leaving Sri Lanka for over four years. X-Press Feeders reportedly offered to pay a fine for his release, which was refused.

Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.

Insights

What are the key factors contributing to environmental pollution in shipping incidents?

How does the limitation of liability principle function in the maritime industry?

What were the immediate effects of the MV X-Press Pearl sinking on Sri Lanka's economy?

How have environmental advocates responded to the X-Press Feeders incident?

What are the potential implications of the Sri Lankan Supreme Court's ruling on global shipping practices?

How has X-Press Feeders' management justified their refusal to pay the damages?

What are the legal complexities involved in the X-Press Feeders case?

What is the significance of the 'polluter pays' principle in international law?

How does the insurance industry react to liability changes in maritime incidents?

What are the differences between the legal systems in Sri Lanka and London regarding maritime law?

What long-term environmental studies are being conducted following the MV X-Press Pearl incident?

How have local fishermen been impacted by the pollution caused by the sinking?

What steps can be taken to prevent future environmental disasters in shipping?

What are the potential consequences if X-Press Feeders does not comply with the court ruling?

How does this incident compare to previous shipping disasters in terms of environmental impact?

What is the role of the United Nations in cases of maritime pollution?

What are the prospects for the affected ecosystems in Sri Lanka following the incident?

How does the legal battle between X-Press Feeders and the Sri Lankan government exemplify international shipping disputes?

What measures have been taken for wreck removal and cleanup after the sinking?

What challenges do countries face in enforcing international maritime law?

Search
NextFinNextFin
NextFin.Al
No Noise, only Signal.
Open App