NextFin

Supreme Court Criticizes Centre for Inadequate Facilities Deterring Retired Judges from Tribunal Appointments

Summarized by NextFin AI
  • The Supreme Court of India criticized the Centre for failing to provide adequate infrastructure for retired judges in tribunals, leading to their reluctance to accept appointments.
  • Retired judges face poor conditions such as inadequate office infrastructure, lack of stationery, and insufficient official vehicles, which the Court attributed to the Centre's negligence.
  • The Court urged the government to treat former judges with dignity, suggesting that if facilities cannot be improved, tribunals should be abolished and cases transferred to high courts.
  • A committee should be formed to address the administrative lapses in tribunals, as highlighted during a plea regarding vacancies in the National Green Tribunal.

NextFin news, New Delhi, this Tuesday — The Supreme Court of India sharply criticized the Centre for its failure to provide proper infrastructure and facilities to retired judges appointed to tribunals, which has resulted in many of them refusing such appointments. The bench, comprising Justices B V Nagarathna and R Mahadevan, expressed concern over the lack of dignity and amenities extended to former chief justices and high court judges who accept tribunal posts.

The Court observed that retired judges often decline tribunal appointments after realizing the poor conditions, including inadequate office infrastructure, lack of stationery, absence of housing arrangements, and insufficient official vehicles. The bench remarked that the fault lies with the Centre, which created these tribunals but failed to ensure basic facilities for their members.

Addressing the Additional Solicitor General Vikramjit Banerjee, the bench highlighted that tribunal chairpersons, some of whom are former chief justices or Supreme Court judges, are provided with the "rickety" vehicles and have to repeatedly request for essential resources. The Court urged the government to treat former judges with dignity and respect.

The Supreme Court further stated that if the Centre is unable to provide proper facilities, it should consider abolishing all tribunals and transfer their matters to the high courts. The bench called for the formation of a committee comprising various ministries, including the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT), to identify and address the lapses in tribunal administration.

The issue arose during the hearing of a plea filed by the National Green Tribunal (NGT) Bar Association Western Zone concerning vacancies in tribunals. The Centre informed the Court that two ex-judges offered appointments did not take charge, necessitating a fresh appointment process, which would take time. The Court did not agree to the petitioner’s request to allow existing members to continue beyond retirement until new appointments are made.

The Supreme Court has scheduled the next hearing on this matter for December 16, 2025.

Source: LiveLaw, Business Standard, ETV Bharat (September 16, 2025)

Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.

Insights

What are the main reasons retired judges are declining tribunal appointments?

How does the Supreme Court of India view the current state of infrastructure for tribunal members?

What specific facilities are lacking for retired judges appointed to tribunals?

What implications might arise if the Centre fails to improve tribunal conditions?

How does the inadequate infrastructure affect the dignity of former judges?

What actions did the Supreme Court suggest the Centre should take regarding tribunal administration?

What was the context of the plea filed by the National Green Tribunal Bar Association?

What are the potential consequences of abolishing all tribunals as suggested by the Supreme Court?

How does the Supreme Court's criticism reflect on the government's responsibility towards judicial appointments?

What are the expected outcomes of the next hearing scheduled for December 16, 2025?

How does the situation in India compare to tribunal systems in other countries?

What challenges are faced by former chief justices and high court judges in accepting tribunal posts?

What role does the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) play in addressing tribunal issues?

How can the government enhance the appeal of tribunal appointments for retired judges?

What impact does the lack of official vehicles have on tribunal operations?

How have other former judges reacted to the current conditions in tribunals?

What historical context is important to understand the tribunal system in India?

In what ways can tribunal reforms improve the judicial system in India?

What other sectors face similar challenges regarding infrastructure and facilities for retired officials?

What steps can be taken to ensure retired judges are treated with the respect they deserve?

Search
NextFinNextFin
NextFin.Al
No Noise, only Signal.
Open App