NextFin News - U.S. President Trump on Thursday dismissed the financial strain of rising energy costs, characterizing gasoline prices as “not very high” despite a 49% surge since the start of the year. Speaking to reporters at the White House before departing for Nevada, the U.S. President argued that the current cost at the pump remains below the catastrophic levels many analysts predicted following the outbreak of the U.S.-led war in Iran on February 28. The remarks come as the national average for regular gasoline reached $4.108 per gallon on April 15, according to data from the American Automobile Association, a sharp climb from the $2.75 level seen in early January.
The U.S. President’s assessment of the energy market stands in stark contrast to the prevailing sentiment among the American electorate. A Quinnipiac University national poll of registered voters released Wednesday revealed that 65% of respondents blame the U.S. President either “a lot” or “some” for the price spike. The political fallout is becoming increasingly visible in the U.S. President’s approval ratings; the same poll found that only 38% of voters approve of his handling of the economy, matching the all-time lows of his administration. While the U.S. President noted that prices have retreated by roughly seven cents a gallon following a two-week ceasefire announcement, the broader trend remains one of significant inflationary pressure.
Market dynamics reflect the volatility of the geopolitical situation. Brent crude oil was trading at $98.15 per barrel on Thursday, maintaining a high premium as the conflict continues to threaten global supply chains. The U.S. President defended the military action as a necessary measure to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, suggesting that the economic trade-off was a calculated risk. However, the burden is being felt unevenly across the country. In California, the average price for regular gasoline has hit $5.89 per gallon, while states like Oklahoma maintain the lowest rates in the nation at approximately $3.27.
The disconnect between the White House and the public may be rooted in differing benchmarks for "high" prices. From the U.S. President’s perspective, the avoidance of a triple-digit oil price explosion—which some feared would follow the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz—represents a relative success. For the average consumer, however, the nearly 50% increase in fuel costs over four months represents a direct hit to household discretionary spending. This divergence is likely to remain a central theme as the 2026 midterm elections approach, with the U.S. President’s economic narrative being tested against the daily reality of the American consumer.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
