NextFin News - In a decisive move to reshape the global critical minerals landscape, U.S. President Trump has finalized a regulatory overhaul aimed at accelerating deep-sea mining operations. On January 22, 2026, a new rule issued by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) officially took effect, significantly lowering the bureaucratic hurdles for American companies seeking to extract minerals from the international seabed. This policy shift is the direct result of an executive order signed by U.S. President Trump in April 2025, titled "Unleashing America’s Offshore Critical Minerals and Resources," which identified the ocean floor as a strategic frontier for national security and energy independence.
The new framework replaces a decades-old, two-step permitting process with a single, consolidated license that covers both exploration and commercial recovery. Previously, companies were required to undergo separate environmental impact statements (EIS) for each phase, a process that could take years to navigate. Under the streamlined rule, a single EIS will suffice for the entire lifecycle of a project. Additionally, the administrative fee for these permits has been adjusted to $350,000, up from the previous $200,000 cap, reflecting the increased administrative intensity of the new "fast-track" reviews. This regulatory pivot is specifically designed to facilitate the collection of polymetallic nodules—potato-sized rocks rich in manganese, nickel, copper, and cobalt—found at depths of 4,000 to 6,000 meters.
The timing of this initiative is inextricably linked to the intensifying resource competition with China, which currently controls over 60% of the world's rare earth production and a significant portion of the processing capacity for battery-grade lithium and cobalt. By opening up the Clarion-Clipperton Zone (CCZ) in the Pacific and waters near U.S. territories like Guam and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI), the Trump administration seeks to bypass land-based supply chain vulnerabilities. According to NOAA, the move is a "milestone" in ensuring that the United States does not fall behind in the technological race for the building blocks of the 21st-century economy, including electric vehicle batteries and advanced defense systems.
Industry reaction has been swift and largely positive. Gerard Baron, CEO of The Metals Company, stated that the rule acknowledges the significant technological advances made in deep-sea nodule collection. His company, a frontrunner in the sector, has already begun the process of seeking licenses under the new U.S. framework. Baron noted that the modernization of the 1980 Deep Seabed Hard Minerals Resource Act was long overdue, as the previous regime did not reflect current subsea robotics and environmental monitoring capabilities. From a financial perspective, the consolidation of permits reduces the "permitting risk" that has historically deterred large-scale capital investment in deep-sea ventures.
However, the expedited approach has ignited a firestorm of opposition from environmental groups and local governments in the Pacific. Emily Jeffers, a senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, characterized the move as "unlawful and unwise," arguing that it commits the U.S. to large-scale exploitation before the scientific community fully understands the deep-sea ecosystems. Scientists warn that the sediment plumes generated by mining robots could suffocate marine life and disrupt carbon sequestration cycles. Furthermore, the U.S. is not a party to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), meaning its unilateral permitting process exists in a legal gray area relative to the International Seabed Authority (ISA), which governs international waters for member nations.
In Guam and the CNMI, the push for nearshore mining has met with local resistance. Governor Lou Leon Guerrero has expressed concern over the speed of the federal rollout and the perceived lack of meaningful consultation with island residents. While the new NOAA rule primarily targets international waters, the 2025 executive order has also spurred interest in a 35.5 million-acre swath of seafloor within the CNMI’s Exclusive Economic Zone. Local leaders fear that the environmental and cultural impacts on their waters are being sidelined in favor of national industrial goals. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) officials are scheduled to meet with stakeholders in the region next month to address these grievances, though many local officials remain skeptical that their input will alter the administration's course.
Looking ahead, the Trump administration’s strategy represents a high-stakes gamble on the future of mining. If successful, the U.S. could establish a dominant position in a new extractive industry, potentially lowering the cost of critical minerals by 30-50% compared to traditional land-based mining. However, the legal challenges from environmental groups and potential diplomatic friction with ISA-member nations could lead to prolonged litigation. As the first consolidated permits are expected to be issued later this year, the global mining industry will be watching closely to see if the deep sea can truly become the reliable "blue battery" that U.S. President Trump envisions, or if the environmental and social costs will prove too high to sustain.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.