NextFin News - The Russian energy sector is grappling with a financial catastrophe as the cumulative impact of Ukrainian drone strikes has now surpassed 1 trillion rubles ($12.9 billion) in total losses. According to data released on February 9, 2026, by industry analysts and insurance executives cited by the Kommersant business daily, the campaign has transitioned from sporadic harassment to a systematic dismantling of Russia’s refining capacity. Yevgeny Borovikov, deputy CEO of insurance broker Mains, confirmed that while direct physical damage exceeds 100 billion rubles, the broader economic toll—including lost profits, supply chain disruptions, and emergency repairs—has pushed the figure into the trillions.
The scope of the devastation is unprecedented. Throughout 2025, Ukraine conducted 120 targeted attacks on Russian energy facilities, with 81 specifically hitting oil refineries. These strikes were not limited to border regions; long-range 'DeepStrike' operations reached deep into the Russian heartland, targeting facilities in Ryazan, Nizhny Novgorod, and even maritime infrastructure in the Caspian Sea. According to Ukrainian Commander-in-Chief Oleksandr Syrskyi, the intensity of these operations reached a peak in January 2026, with 48 fire missions conducted against oil and gas targets in that month alone. This sustained pressure has resulted in a 19% reduction in Russia's total oil refining output, equivalent to approximately 53.4 million tons per year.
The economic logic behind Kyiv’s strategy is a calculated war of attrition against the Kremlin’s 'petrodollar' lifeline. By focusing on primary distillation units (AVT-6), which are complex, expensive, and often reliant on Western components now restricted by sanctions, Ukraine has maximized the 'repair-to-damage' ratio. Analysis of the 2025 data shows that August and December were the most volatile months, with 14 and 24 major incidents respectively. This volatility has sent shockwaves through the Russian insurance market. Alexei Khutoryansky, head of corporate underwriting at Soglasie, noted that losses from 'terrorism' and sabotage coverage have jumped tenfold, leading to a surge in premiums and deductibles that further erodes the profitability of Russian energy giants like Rosneft and Lukoil.
Beyond the immediate financial ledger, the operational impact is visible in Russia’s shifting export patterns. According to Gecon, cargo volumes along the Northern Sea Route fell for the second consecutive year in 2025, totaling 37.02 million metric tons. While the Kremlin had hoped to use the Arctic route to bypass traditional bottlenecks, the instability in domestic production and the risks associated with maritime terminals have hampered these ambitions. Furthermore, the decline in refining has forced Russia to export more crude oil at lower margins rather than high-value refined products like diesel and gasoline, directly impacting the federal budget's tax receipts.
The geopolitical dimension of this energy war is further complicated by the stance of the United States. U.S. President Trump, who assumed office in January 2025, has maintained a complex position on the conflict. While U.S. President Trump initially brokered a brief 'energy truce' to stabilize global markets, the resumption of large-scale Russian aerial assaults on Ukrainian cities in early February 2026 has led Kyiv to double down on its refinery strikes as a form of asymmetric deterrence. The White House has expressed concern over global oil price volatility, yet the strategic reality remains that Ukraine views these strikes as its most effective leverage to force a negotiated settlement.
Looking ahead, the trend suggests a permanent shift in the Russian energy landscape. The 'DeepStrike' campaign has proven that Russia’s vast geography is no longer a shield against precision attrition. As long as Ukraine maintains its drone production capacity—which Syrskyi reported at over 300,000 special tasks in January 2026—the Russian refining sector will remain in a state of 'forced maintenance.' For the global market, this means a continued premium on refined products and a persistent risk of supply shocks. For the Kremlin, the 1 trillion ruble hole in its energy sector is not just a financial loss; it is a strategic vulnerability that threatens the very foundation of its industrial war machine.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.