NextFin News - In a high-stakes session of the United Nations Security Council on February 18, 2026, UN Under-Secretary-General for Political and Peacebuilding Affairs Rosemary DiCarlo issued a stark warning that Israel’s recent policy shifts in the West Bank amount to a "gradual de facto annexation." The briefing, held at the UN headquarters in New York and chaired by UK Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper, highlighted a series of unilateral measures approved by the Israeli government over the past week. These initiatives, backed by far-right ministers, include the first formal land registration in the territory since 1967 and the transfer of administrative powers from military to civilian authorities, specifically targeting Area C but potentially impacting areas under Palestinian Authority administration.
According to RTE, DiCarlo emphasized that these measures constitute a "dangerous expansion of Israeli civil authority" that could lead to rapid settlement expansion by removing long-standing bureaucratic barriers. The UN official’s report was bolstered by a joint statement from 85 member states—including the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and Italy—condemning the moves as violations of international law. In response, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar dismissed the criticism, asserting Israel’s "historical and documented right" to the land and accusing the Security Council of an "anti-Israeli obsession." The timing of this escalation is particularly sensitive, occurring just as U.S. President Trump prepares to convene the inaugural meeting of the "Board of Peace" in Washington on February 19, 2026.
The analytical core of this development lies in the transition from "creeping" to "structural" annexation. For decades, the international community has monitored the expansion of settlements, but the current shift represents a qualitative change in governance. By moving land administration from the Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT)—a military body—to civilian-led departments within the Israeli government, Israel is effectively erasing the legal distinction between its sovereign territory and the occupied West Bank. This administrative "civilianization" is a hallmark of de facto annexation, as it applies domestic Israeli law to a territory that is internationally recognized as under military occupation.
Data from recent months indicates a significant acceleration in this trend. According to reports cited by NOS, the Israeli government has recently approved the registration of large swaths of the West Bank as "state property," a move that facilitates the legal transfer of land to Israeli settlers while bypassing the complex military permit system that previously acted as a friction point. This policy shift is not merely symbolic; it has immediate economic and demographic consequences. By easing land purchases and building permits for Israelis, the government is incentivizing a demographic shift that makes the territorial contiguity required for a future Palestinian state increasingly impossible.
Furthermore, the geopolitical context of 2026 adds a layer of complexity to this crisis. The emergence of the U.S.-led Board of Peace, chaired by U.S. President Trump, has created a dual-track diplomatic environment. While the UN remains the traditional forum for international law, the Board of Peace—which includes up to 35 member states and focuses on pragmatic reconstruction in Gaza—is increasingly viewed as a rival center of influence. The fact that the UN was unrepresented at the Board's initial meetings suggests a growing rift in how the Middle East peace process is managed. U.S. Ambassador Mike Waltz’s comment that the Board is "doing" rather than "talking" reflects a transactional approach to diplomacy that may prioritize regional stability and reconstruction over the legalistic frameworks of the Oslo Accords.
Looking forward, the trend toward de facto annexation is likely to trigger a series of legal and economic retaliations. The European Union and several Arab states have already hinted at potential sanctions or the reassessment of trade agreements if the land registration policy is fully implemented. However, the internal political dynamics in Israel suggest that the far-right coalition remains committed to this path, viewing the current U.S. administration's focus on the Board of Peace as a window of opportunity to finalize territorial claims. If the Palestinian Authority’s tax revenues continue to be withheld and its administrative reach further curtailed, the risk of a total collapse of the Oslo-era governance structure becomes a near-term probability rather than a distant threat.
In conclusion, the warnings from DiCarlo and the 85-nation coalition signal a pivotal moment in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The shift toward civilian administration in the West Bank is a structural change that may be irreversible through traditional diplomacy. As the international community grapples with this new reality, the effectiveness of the UN as a guarantor of international law is being tested against a new, transactional model of peace-building led by Washington. The coming months will determine whether the "gradual" annexation described by the UN becomes a permanent, recognized reality on the ground.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
