NextFin News - In a revelation that underscores the fragile nature of Indo-Pacific diplomacy, internal military documents from Hanoi have surfaced, detailing Vietnam’s contingency plans for a potential "war of aggression" by the United States. According to a report released on February 2, 2026, by The 88 Project, a human rights organization, the Vietnamese Ministry of Defense completed a strategic assessment titled "The 2nd U.S. Invasion Plan" in August 2024. This document, which has circulated among top leadership as U.S. President Trump enters the second year of his second term, characterizes Washington as a "belligerent" power capable of launching large-scale invasions against nations that deviate from its geopolitical orbit.
The timing of this disclosure is particularly striking. It comes just over a year after Vietnam elevated its relationship with Washington to a "Comprehensive Strategic Partnership," the highest tier of its diplomatic hierarchy. While U.S. President Trump’s administration has focused on narrowing trade deficits—with Vietnam’s surplus with the U.S. now rivaling that of China—Hanoi’s military establishment remains deeply suspicious. The documents suggest that while the risk of immediate war is low, the U.S. is actively seeking to "spread and impose its values regarding freedom, democracy, and human rights" to foment a "color revolution" aimed at toppling the Communist Party of Vietnam (CPV).
This strategic schizophrenia is rooted in a fundamental ideological divide. To the Vietnamese military, the U.S. pursuit of a "Free and Open Indo-Pacific" is not merely a security framework against China, but a Trojan horse for regime change. Ben Swanton, co-director of The 88 Project, notes that this perspective is not a fringe sentiment but represents a consensus across the Vietnamese government. The military analysts argue that across the Obama, Trump, and Biden administrations, Washington has consistently sought to build a front against China while simultaneously undermining the internal stability of socialist states. The recent U.S. military operation to capture former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has only heightened these fears, providing Hanoi’s conservatives with fresh evidence that the U.S. remains willing to violate national sovereignty to remove leaders it dislikes.
Economically, however, Vietnam cannot afford to alienate Washington. The United States remains Vietnam’s largest export market, a critical engine for a country that has successfully lifted millions out of poverty through trade-led growth. Under the leadership of To Lam, who was reappointed General Secretary in January 2026, Vietnam has attempted to charm the current U.S. administration. Lam has overseen significant investments, including a $1.5 billion Trump-branded golf and luxury real estate project in Hung Yen province. Furthermore, Lam’s swift acceptance of U.S. President Trump’s invitation to join the "Board of Peace" signals a pragmatic attempt to secure economic concessions and personal rapport with the American executive.
Yet, the "2nd U.S. Invasion Plan" reveals that these economic overtures are a form of tactical hedging rather than a genuine strategic shift. The document portrays China—Vietnam’s largest two-way trading partner—as a regional rival but not an existential threat to the CPV’s survival. As Zachary Abuza, a professor at the National War College, observes, Beijing understands that pushing Hanoi too hard could trigger a mass uprising that might destabilize the region, whereas the U.S. is perceived as actively desiring such an uprising. This creates a paradox where Vietnam seeks U.S. security cooperation to deter Chinese maritime expansion in the South China Sea, while simultaneously training its troops to repel a U.S. invasion.
Looking forward, the friction between Vietnam’s economic necessity and its security paranoia is likely to intensify. U.S. President Trump’s administration has signaled a transactional approach to the region, prioritizing the reduction of trade imbalances and the enforcement of tariffs on countries doing business with U.S. adversaries like Iran. For Vietnam, which maintains close ties with Cuba and Russia, this creates a minefield of potential sanctions. If the U.S. moves to penalize Hanoi for its "multi-vector" diplomacy, the conservative faction within the CPV will likely gain further leverage, potentially stalling the implementation of the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership.
The internal documents suggest that Vietnam’s military modernization is increasingly focused on "unconventional forms of warfare," preparing for a scenario where the U.S. uses human rights or religious freedom as a pretext for intervention. While the Trump administration has generally downplayed democracy promotion in favor of "America First" realism, its willingness to use military force for specific objectives—as seen in Latin America—keeps Hanoi in a state of high alert. In the coming years, the world can expect Vietnam to continue its delicate balancing act: welcoming American capital and golf courses with one hand, while tightening internal security and military readiness against the very source of that capital with the other.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
