On December 8, 2025, the Indian government began reviewing a controversial mandate proposed by the Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI), which represents major telecom players such as Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel. The proposal requires all smartphone manufacturers, including Apple, Google, and Samsung, to enable always-on Assisted GPS (A-GPS) on devices sold within India. This would effectively activate continuous satellite-based location tracking without user opt-out options. According to CybersecurityNews, the rationale cited by COAI emphasizes that current cellular tower triangulation methods provide only rough location data, which can be inaccurate by several meters. Accurate GPS tracking is expected to assist law enforcement agencies in criminal investigations and improve disaster response effectiveness.
This move has encountered strong resistance from leading technology companies. Through their lobby group, the India Cellular & Electronics Association (ICEA), Apple, Google, and Samsung have formally contested the proposal, warning of significant privacy violations and national security risks. Industry experts characterize the measure as unprecedented regulatory overreach that would transform each smartphone into a potential surveillance device capable of tracking users within a meter-level precision. Concerns extend to the potential exposure of sensitive personnel, including military and judiciary members, to constant monitoring. Activist groups, notably Amnesty International, have labeled the proposal “deeply concerning,” highlighting potential human rights infringements.
The proposal is currently under assessment by India's IT and Home Ministries, with no final decision reached amid vigorous debate and public backlash. This controversy follows the government’s recent withdrawal of an order mandating pre-installation of a state-run cyber safety application on smartphones, underscoring the fraught environment surrounding digital privacy in India.
Several dimensions emerge from this development. The telecom industry’s motivation stems from a desire to enhance location-tracking fidelity for regulatory and security purposes, addressing limitations inherent in cellular tower location intelligence. The proposed always-on GPS mandate aligns with heightened law enforcement demands for precise geolocation data in an era marked by rising cybercrime and complex urban investigations.
At the same time, the unanimous opposition from Apple, Google, and Samsung signals a critical juncture in the global smartphone ecosystem. These companies operate on business models predicated on user trust and data privacy, balancing compliance with regional regulations against universal privacy standards. The Indian government’s demand challenges these principles, potentially forcing tech firms to adapt device architectures and software systems fundamentally, with implications beyond India’s borders.
Economic considerations also loom large. India, with over 1.2 billion mobile subscribers, represents a crucial growth market for smartphone manufacturers. Any imposition of mandatory surveillance features carries risks of consumer pushback and could compel firms to consider India-specific device variants or alter investment strategies. Apple's ramping up of local manufacturing in India illustrates the significance of this market. The mandatory always-on GPS could thus complicate Apple’s expansion plans and influence competitive positioning in South Asia.
From a regulatory and policy perspective, India currently lacks explicit legislative authority for such pervasive digital surveillance, presenting complex legal challenges. The government must weigh public safety objectives against constitutional protections and international privacy norms. The ongoing deliberations may set a precedent for other nations contemplating similar surveillance frameworks, either emboldening state-level monitoring or reaffirming privacy safeguards depending on the outcome.
Moreover, this debate intersects with India’s recent digital control initiatives—such as the attempted mandatory pre-installation of the Sanchar Saathi cybersecurity app—which faced enormous public resistance due to privacy concerns. The GPS proposal forms part of a broader trend toward expanding state access to granular digital data, highlighting tensions between security imperatives and civil liberties in the digital age.
Looking ahead, the government’s approach to transparency, user consent mechanisms, and judicial oversight will be pivotal. The technology sector's warnings about removing user control features—like location access notifications—reflect fears of eroding individual agency over personal data. Effective regulatory frameworks might require incorporating privacy-by-design principles to mitigate risks while still serving legitimate security interests.
In conclusion, India’s consideration of mandated always-on GPS tracking on smartphones encapsulates a high-stakes contest between emerging digital surveillance ambitions and entrenched global privacy standards advocated by dominant tech companies. The resolution will significantly influence global norms on government-mandated device-level tracking, impact multinational smartphone operations, and affect billions of users’ digital privacy rights. As U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration continues to emphasize national security and digital sovereignty globally, the unfolding Indian case offers a critical lens into the evolving interplay between technology, governance, and privacy in 2025 and beyond.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
