NextFin news, in early November 2025, a pivotal assessment emerged regarding the trade agreements reached between the United States and several ASEAN countries, including Malaysia, under President Donald Trump's administration. This comes shortly after President Trump’s recent Asia-Pacific visit and in the wake of negotiations concluded or nearing completion involving reciprocal tariff arrangements. Lim Teck Ghee, a prominent economic historian, highlighted concerns over the premature nature of these trade agreements in an authoritative publication on November 7, 2025. The Malaysia Attorney General’s Chambers (AGC) further clarified on November 3, 2025, Malaysia’s sovereign right to terminate its bilateral Reciprocal Tariff Agreement (RTA) with the US at any time through written notice, emphasizing sovereignty preservation amid widespread criticism.
The agreements were struck within the context of US tariffs initially imposed as high as 49% on ASEAN exports, with Malaysia's tariff on goods to the US reduced to a capped rate of 19% under the new arrangements. These deals included commitments to purchases in sectors such as aerospace and liquefied natural gas (LNG), alongside adherence to US-driven export controls, especially targeting China. The US seeks to curb transshipment practices enabling Chinese goods to enter the US market through ASEAN countries. Yet, opaque enforcement rules have generated supply chain uncertainties. The agreements notably lack conventional dispute resolution mechanisms, granting the US considerable leverage over ASEAN trade partners.
Underlying this thread is a crucial legal challenge pending before the US Supreme Court, slated for ruling imminently, concerning the legitimacy of the broad tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). Lower courts have questioned the presidential authority behind these tariffs, suggesting that a substantial restriction or annulment by the Supreme Court could eliminate the US’s primary pressure tool in trade negotiations.
This legal cloud has reignited calls across ASEAN and Malaysia to renegotiate the Trump-era tariffs, with many stakeholders arguing that negotiations conducted while tariffs were under legal contention reflected a position of duress, potentially yielding unfavorable terms. The AGC’s recent statement confirming Malaysia’s unilateral right to terminate the RTA adds a concrete legal foundation for revisiting or repudiating elements of the current trade framework.
The immediate impacts of these trade deals include short-term tariff reductions providing relief and market access predictability for ASEAN exports. Nonetheless, key economic concessions, such as mandated procurement of US products and strategic alignment with US export policies aimed at China, pose long-term risks. Such measures may weaken ASEAN’s strategic autonomy and complicate relations with China, ASEAN's largest trading partner, potentially triggering retaliatory trade measures.
Moreover, the bilateral nature of many agreements has undermined ASEAN’s collective bargaining power, with individual countries negotiating separately to avoid competitive disadvantages. This fragmentation contrasts with ASEAN leaders’ advocacy for regional unity and diminishes ASEAN’s global trade influence. The strategic trade-offs and high stakes involved raise concerns about ASEAN’s future positioning amid the intensifying US-China economic rivalry.
Data from CGS International indicates that Malaysia has been among the biggest beneficiaries in terms of exemptions granted by the US during Trump’s recent Asia-Pacific tour, with over 60% of its export products to the US gaining tariff relief. However, businesses and policy analysts caution that this relief is fragile, contingent on legal and geopolitical developments, highlighting the importance of a robust and durable trade framework.
Looking forward, ASEAN and Malaysia face a complex but critical path. Renegotiation efforts would need to realign tariff terms with evolving legal rulings, incorporate dispute settlement provisions safeguarding sovereign trade interests, and ideally establish a regional unified stance to enhance bargaining leverage. The post-Supreme Court ruling period, possibly starting in 2026, offers a strategic window to recalibrate these deals, striking a better balance between market access, economic concessions, and geopolitical risk mitigation.
Furthermore, ASEAN’s ability to maintain strategic autonomy will hinge on fostering diversified trade partnerships and reducing overreliance on bilateral US deals that may compromise broader regional economic integration within frameworks like RCEP and ASEAN Economic Community (AEC).
In conclusion, the ASEAN region and Malaysia must urgently address the vulnerabilities exposed by the Trump-era tariff agreements. They must proactively pursue renegotiations that restore ASEAN’s strategic trade autonomy, reduce economic and political risks posed by unilateral US leverage and maintain balanced relations with key global partners such as China. Failure to do so risks undermining ASEAN’s central role in regional trade governance and the sustainable economic growth of its member economies.
According to authoritative analysis from Aliran and official clarifications from Malaysia’s Attorney General’s Chambers, the pressure to renegotiate these Trump-era deals is both a reaction to present challenges and a strategic imperative for future economic resilience.
Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.
