NextFin

Congress Leaders Criticize Modi Government for Systematically Weakening RTI Act on Its 20th Anniversary

Summarized by NextFin AI
  • Congress leaders criticized the Modi government for systematically weakening the RTI Act, which was intended to empower citizens and promote transparency.
  • Mallikarjun Kharge condemned amendments that reduced the independence of Information Commissioners and highlighted the negative impact of the 2023 DPDP Act on public interest.
  • Kharge noted that the government has withheld critical information, creating a climate of fear for RTI activists, with over 100 activists murdered since 2014.
  • The Congress party demands restoration of the RTI Act's original spirit by ensuring independence of Information Commissions and amending the DPDP Act.

NextFin news, New Delhi, Sunday, October 12, 2025 – Congress leaders sharply criticized the Narendra Modi-led government on the 20th anniversary of the Right to Information (RTI) Act for systematically weakening the law, which was originally enacted to empower citizens and promote transparency in governance.

Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge condemned the government for eroding the RTI Act over the past 11 years, stating that these actions have hollowed out democracy and citizens’ fundamental rights. Kharge highlighted key government moves such as the 2019 amendments that brought the tenure and pay of Information Commissioners under government control, effectively reducing their independence.

Kharge also pointed to the 2023 Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, which he said gutted the RTI’s public interest clause by prioritizing privacy, thereby enabling the government to shield corruption and avoid scrutiny. He noted that the Central Information Commission has frequently operated without a Chief Information Commissioner and currently has eight vacancies unfilled for over 15 months, paralyzing the appeals process.

“A chilling ‘no data available’ doctrine now prevails,” Kharge said, accusing the government of withholding information on critical issues such as COVID-19 deaths, National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) data, All India Survey on Higher Education (ASUSE), and the PM CARES Fund. He further highlighted that since 2014, over 100 RTI activists have been murdered, creating a climate of fear that suppresses dissent and punishes truth-seekers.

Congress General Secretary Jairam Ramesh echoed these concerns, listing instances where RTI disclosures contradicted official government claims, including controversies over the Prime Minister’s degree, fake ration cards, demonetization meetings, non-performing assets, and black money repatriation. Ramesh warned that the DPDP Act’s exemption of personal information from RTI threatens to abolish the law’s effectiveness unless reviewed and amended.

Deputy Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar also criticized the 2019 amendments for weakening the independence of Information Commissioners and flagged the DPDP Act for broadly categorizing critical public data as private, undermining public audit and scrutiny.

The Congress party demanded restoration of the RTI Act’s original spirit by ensuring the independence of Information Commissions, filling vacancies promptly, amending the DPDP Act, protecting RTI users and whistleblowers, and including journalists, activists, and women in the commissions.

The RTI Act, enacted in 2005 by the Congress-led UPA government under Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Sonia Gandhi, was hailed as a landmark law to promote transparency and accountability. However, opposition parties and civil society have increasingly raised concerns about legislative and administrative changes under the Modi government that have weakened the law’s effectiveness and independence.

Explore more exclusive insights at nextfin.ai.

Insights

What is the original purpose of the Right to Information (RTI) Act?

How has the RTI Act evolved since its inception in 2005?

What specific amendments were made to the RTI Act in 2019?

What impact did the 2023 Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act have on the RTI Act?

How have the vacancies in the Central Information Commission affected the RTI process?

What are the recent criticisms from Congress leaders regarding the RTI Act?

What examples did Congress leaders provide to illustrate the government's lack of transparency?

How has the climate for RTI activists changed since 2014?

What are the implications of the DPDP Act on public interest disclosures?

What demands has the Congress party made regarding the RTI Act's restoration?

What role did the Congress-led UPA government play in the establishment of the RTI Act?

How do opposition parties and civil society perceive the changes to the RTI Act under the Modi government?

What are the potential long-term effects of weakening the RTI Act on democracy?

How does the current situation of the RTI Act compare to its initial implementation?

What challenges do whistleblowers and RTI users face in the current environment?

What are the key arguments for and against the amendments made to the RTI Act?

How does the RTI Act's effectiveness vary across different states in India?

What historical precedents exist for government efforts to limit transparency laws?

In what ways can the independence of Information Commissioners be safeguarded?

What are the consequences of a 'no data available' doctrine on citizen rights?

Search
NextFinNextFin
NextFin.Al
No Noise, only Signal.
Open App